Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06220474

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive RF Treatment in Refractory MGD

The goal of this prospective, 24-week, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trials to compare clinical efficacy and safety of RF and MGX with MGX alone in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease. The main question it aims to answer is whether radiofrequency treatment and meibomian gland expression is more effective in improving tear breakup time, as measured using non-invasive video keratography, compared with meibomian gland expression alone, in patients with refractory meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease.

Participants will be divided into two groups, one group will receive RF treatment followed with MGX and another will receive sham treatment with MGX.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Grantham Hospital, Hong Kong

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Dry eye disease(DED) is a prevalent age-related ophthalmic condition. Depending on the population studied and the diagnostic criteria used, dry eye disease is estimated to have a high prevalence in most populations , with a female preponderance. In the latest 2017 Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II (TFOS DEWS II) Epidemiology Report, which compiled dry eye prevalence data from studies worldwide, the reported the prevalence of DED ranged from 5 to 50%. The risk of dry eye disease increases with age, where with every increase in 10 years of age, the self-reported symptoms of DED increased by 2%. In one study in Asia, up to 70% of elderly patients greater than 60 years of age suffering from symptomatic dry eye disease. Dry eye disease causes gritty and painful eyes, with associated blurred vision. For sufferers, it poses a significant burden on quality of life and limitations activities on activities of daily living, resulting in considerable economic costs to society. A 2006 health-economics study in the United Kingdom estimated that the annual healthcare costs to the public sector for every 1000 dry eye patients was USD 1.1 million.

The causes of dry eye can be broadly classified into those with aqueous tear deficiency, excessive tear evaporation or a combination of both. The most common cause of excessive tear evaporation is meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). This is a common condition of the eyelids where there is a significant change in both the consistency and quantity of meibum, resulting in chronic inflammation of the eyelids and subsequent ocular surface dysfunction. MGD has a prevalence from 46.2% to 69.3% in several studies targeting Asian populations, with a trend of higher prevalence in the elderly. Insufficient lipid secretion from meibomian gland undermines tear film stability, producing dry eye symptoms despite normal tear secretion. In a recent study, up to 70.3% of dry eye patients were found to have concurrent MGD. Refractory MGD is defined by the failure to respond to more than at least three types of conventional therapy, including lubricating eyedrops, gels and ointments and topical or systemic anti-inflammatory treatment, in the past two years.

Currently heat-based therapies are the mainstay and most effective strategies against MGD. Eyelid warming, thermal pulsation and intense light therapy are three prevailing heat-based treatments for MGD- related dry eye disease. Eyelid warming usually involves the application of warm towels, commercialized eye masks (EyeGiene® or Blephasteam®) or eye bags (MGDRx Eye Bag) at least twice a day. Thermal pulsation (Lipiflow®) refers to the delivery of controlled heat together with gentle massage to the eyelids by the machine for 10-17 minutes. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy, which uses light energy on the skin surface, is widely used in dermatology to treat a variety of conditions including dermal vascular lesions, such as port wine stains and hemangiomas, facial rosacea, and acne. Each treatment strategy however carries significant limitations. Self-applied eyelid warm compress is cheap and easily available, but when used alone has limited efficacy. Furthermore, sustained patient adherence to treatment is difficult long term. A single treatment of thermal pulsation therapy has been shown to have sustained therapeutic effects up to 12 months after treatment. However, thermal pulsation is not effective in moderate to severe cases of MGD. From existing studies, IPL has greater clinical efficacy than thermal pulsation, but its therapeutic effects are maintained for a significantly shorter period. As such, monthly repeated treatments for up to 8 months may be required for sustained effects. It is also important to note that none of the existing treatments allow the eyelids to evacuate inspissated meibum effectively, with meibum expression by an ophthalmologist an important step in the treatment process. Thus, MGD is likely to recur long-term.

The Thermage FLX System (WA, USA) is a non-ablative radiofrequency (RF) energy-based device, which has been widely adopted in the cosmetic industry for radiofrequency tissue tightening. RF transfers high energy fluences through the skin to deep dermal layers uniformly while protecting the epidermis. It is postulated that RF stimulates subdermal collagen production for tissue tightening effect. There are several advantages of using non-invasive RF treatment over other currently available energy-based devices. Firstly, the Thermage FLX has a much more precise applicator directly targeting the meibomian glands. Thermage FLX addresses both the upper and lower eyelids as close as possible to the lid margin, which is directly where the meibomian glands are situated, it also addresses the tragus area as well, hence a more precise and direct treatment area can be achieved. Secondly, compared to other energy-based devices, Thermage FLX provides a higher accumulative heat transfer effect around the periocular region, due to its repeated application of at least 4-5 cycles around the periorbital region. With higher accumulative heat energy, we anticipate a better and more effective melting of the meibum, which aids in more effective meibum expression. Thirdly, as Thermage FLX has been widely adopted for radiofrequency tissue tightening due to its collagen resynthesis effect, there has been proven improvement of the elasticity of orbicularis and periocular skin tissue, this can promote better blinking effort and better apposition of lid margins. This may enhance the pumping effect of the orbicularis oculi in the long-term. RF treatment is potentially a safe and effective multimodal treatment for MGD-related dry eye disease.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 or more
  • Bilateral dry eye disease as confirmed by presence of both symptoms and signs 2.1 Symptoms: Abnormal result on the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire (SPEED) dry eye symptom questionnaire (≥5) 2.2 Signs: Abnormal result in at least one of the following three clinical tests - tear osmolarity, NIKBUT and corneal staining for punctate epithelial erosions and,
  • Bilateral moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction - at least Grade 1 meibum quality (cloudy appearance) and Grade 2 meibum expressibility (moderate pressure required). And,
  • Refractory MGD - The failure to respond to at least three types of conventional therapy, including artificial tears, topical or systemic antibiotics and anti-inflammatory treatments and the aforementioned heat-based therapies, over a period of at least 2 years
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV - Type V and VI skinned subjects are excluded from the study due to the high risk of pain and focal hypopigmentation
  • Mentally fit to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Fitzpatrick skin type V-VI
  • History of eyelid scarring
  • Infrared meibography evidence of significant acinar gland atrophy (dropout of >30%) - these patients have been shown not to benefit from heat-based therapies due to end-stage disease
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Active corneal disease such as infectious keratitis, allergic keratoconjunctivitis, pterygium, exposure keratopathy, lagophthalmos, trichiasis or dellen
  • Current systemic intake of photosensitive medications, including tetracycline group of drugs.
  • History of corneal abnormality or surgery within 3 months

Treatment and study plan

The Thermage FLX System

Device

The Thermage FLX System is tested for its therapeutic efficacy and safety on treating refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Sham treatment

Device

Sham treatment acts as a control to test the therapeutic efficacy and safety of The Thermage FLX System

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in non-invasive keratographic tear breakup time (NIKBUT)

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months post- treatment between study groups

    NIKBUT is measured in seconds and average of 3 consecutive readings is taken. Higher values mean better outcomes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) symptom score

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

    One number was collected per patient, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  2. Percentage of subjects with normal non-invasive keratographic tear breakup time (NIKBUT)

    Time frame: 6 months

    > 10 seconds, with lower scores meaning worse

  3. Percentage of subjects with normal SPEED

    Time frame: 6 months

    <5, with higher scores meaning worse

  4. Change in best corrected visual acuity

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

    from logmar(1.0 to -0.1)

  5. Incidence of periorbital pain

    Time frame: 6 months

    at least 3/10 and above, with higher scores meaning worse

  6. Incidence of ocular adverse events

    Time frame: 6 months

    evidence of uveitis, conjunctivitis, scleritis/episcleritis, new lens opacities, new cornea opacities

  7. Incidence of non-ocular adverse events

    Time frame: 6 months

    eyelid skin burn, eyelid redness, eyelid hyper/hypopigmentation

Other outcomes

  1. Change in cornea staining (National Eye Institute Grading System)

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

    This serves as an objective parameter for ocular surface damage, with higher scores meaning worse

  2. Tear osmolarity

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

    This serves as an objective parameter for ocular surface damage

  3. Change in Shirmer's I test reading

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

    In millimetres. Readings serve as objective parameters for tear volume

  4. Tear meniscus height

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

    In millimetres. Readings serve as objective parameters for tear volume

  5. Changes in meiboscore

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

    These readings serve as parameters for meibomian gland dysfunction

  6. Changes in meibum expressibility

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

    These readings serve as parameters for meibomian gland dysfunction, with higher scores meaning worse

  7. Changes in meibum quality

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

    These readings serve as parameters for meibomian gland dysfunction, with higher scores meaning worse

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Kendrick Co SHIH

CONTACT

[email protected]

94326271

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive Radiofrequency Treatment in Patients With Refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 24, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.