Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04106310

Theranova vs High-flux HD Comparison

This research proposal of an investigator-initiated clinical study aims to examine the impact of uremic toxin removal afforded by middle cut-off (MCO) dialysis on clinical parameters and surrogate biomarkers pertinent to nutritional, systemic and vascular complications in dialysis patients. The primary research goal is to evaluate the outcomes indicative of nutritional status (as measured by body mass index, body composition monitoring, albumin, clinical assessments such as subjective global assessment, etc.) and parameters relevant to pathophysiological processes in uremia focusing on inflammation and cardiovascular risks. The secondary research aims are to examine dialysis efficacy between MCO dialysis and conventional hemodialysis (CHD). Specifically, dialysis efficacy will be determined by within and between subject differences in baseline versus short term (6 months) and long term (12 months) effects of MCO dialysis and CHD in:

1. Removal of small molecules (e.g. urea), middle molecules (Beta-2 microglobulin, Phosphate and Creatinine) and protein bound solutes 2. Markers of inflammation, ossification and fibrosis 3. Uremia associated epigenetic modification The investigators hypothesize superiority of nutritional parameters in patients undergoing MCO dialysis compared with patients on CHD. The investigators plan to randomize 60 patients to either MCO dialysis or CHD at two hemodialysis units in Hong Kong.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Accumulation of uremic toxins is associated morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease, but the pathogenic mechanisms how they lead to various clinical complications remain elusive. Conventional hemodialysis is effective in removing small molecular solutes (in the range of 50-15,000 Da), but the removal of protein-bound and middle to larger molecular toxins (up to 50,000 Da) remains unsatisfactory even with augmented hemodialysis frequency or duration. The notion that dialysis adequacy is no longer a simple quantitative measure of small molecular removal has led to the clinical application of intensive hemodialysis and the search for novel strategies to reduce uremic toxin burden.

Recently, a new class of membrane with molecular weight cut off (MWCO) close to the molecular weight of albumin was introduced. The focus of this new therapy, known as expanded dialysis using the medium cut off (MCO) dialysis membrane, is to provide the potential for more efficient removal of middle molecules and protein bound uremic toxins without excessive loss of albumin. To date, MCO dialysis has been associated with a reduction in transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e. interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor-α) and middle molecules especially free lambda light chains.

Protein-energy wasting and cardiovascular diseases are prevalent in chronic kidney disease and is related to inflammation and increased mortality. Despite growing data on the clearance of individual uremic toxins and biochemical parameters, the impact of MCO dialysis on clinical outcomes and mechanistic parameters related to nutrition and inflammation remains to be investigated.

The objective of the study is to compare MCO dialysis with conventional high-flux HD, on nutritional parameters, inflammation and cardiovascular biomarkers and related clinical outcomes.

Since twice-weekly HD is commonly practiced in Hong Kong, this study provides a distinct opportunity to investigate whether MCO dialysis might be particularly advantageous in patients receiving a relatively lower dialysis dose through the removal of a broader spectrum of uremic toxins.

The investigators hypothesize that MCO dialysis with Theranova Dialyzer (HDx) improves parameters related to nutrition and inflammation compared with high-flux HD.

This will be a prospective single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial with stable HD patients randomized at 1:1 ratio to either one of the following - A. to continue with HD using the same high-flux dialyzer as in the previous 6 weeks (high-flux HD arm) B. change to HDx using Theranova Dialyzer (MCO dialysis arm)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients age greater than 18 years old
  • end-stage renal failure on two- or three-times per week high-flux HD for more than 90 days
  • mean spKt/Vurea >1.2 per session (for 3 dialysis sessions per week) or spKt/Vurea >1.8 per session (for 2 dialysis sessions per week)

Exclusion criteria

  • active malignancy
  • unable to give informed consent or complete questionnaires
  • unstable clinical condition defined as significant clinical event requiring hospitalization in the past 90 days
  • unreliable vascular access
  • unable to achieve HD blood flow >150ml/min

Treatment and study plan

High-flux dialyzer

Device

a dialyzer meeting the definition of high-flux

Theranova Dialyzer

Device

a middle cut-off dialyzer

Primary outcomes

  1. lean tissue index

    Time frame: 12 months

    measured by Body Composition Monitor

  2. Body Mass Index

    Time frame: 12 months

    measured by weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of heights (in meters)

Secondary outcomes

  1. asymmetrical dimethylarginine

    Time frame: 12 months

    endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, one of the cardiovascular biomarkers

  2. fibroblast growth factor 23

    Time frame: 12 months

    biomarker for bone turnover

  3. Klotho

    Time frame: 12 months

    biomarker for atherosclerosis and bone turnover

  4. Kt/V urea

    Time frame: 12 months

    measurement of clearance of urea by hemodialysis therapy, a marker for adequacy of dialysis

  5. beta-2 microglobulin

    Time frame: 12 months

    middle size uremic toxin

  6. Pentraxin-3

    Time frame: 12 months

    middle to large molecular size uremic toxin

  7. soluble endothelial protein C receptor

    Time frame: 12 months

    a marker for endothelial dysfunction

  8. soluble thrombomodulin

    Time frame: 12 months

    a marker for endothelial dysfunction

  9. hemoglobulin

    Time frame: 12 months

    indication of anemia

  10. high-sensitive C reactive protein

    Time frame: 12 months

    marker for inflammation

  11. interleukin 6

    Time frame: 12 months

    marker for inflammation

  12. tumor necrosis factor alpha

    Time frame: 12 months

    marker for inflammation

  13. albumin

    Time frame: 12 months

    marker for nutritional status

  14. Leptin

    Time frame: 12 months

    marker for nutritional status and appetite

  15. adiponectin

    Time frame: 12 months

    nutritional marker

  16. phosphate

    Time frame: 12 months

    small size uremic waste produce

  17. low-density lipoprotein

    Time frame: 12 months

    reflects lipid control

  18. high-density lipoprotein

    Time frame: 12 months

    reflects lipid control

  19. triglyceride

    Time frame: 12 months

    reflects lipid control

  20. Malnutrition-Inflammation Score

    Time frame: 12 months

    a measurement scale reflecting nutritional status

  21. Subjective Global Assesment questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months

    a measurement scale reflecting nutritional status

  22. fat tissue index

    Time frame: 12 months

    nutritional marker measured by Body Composition Monitor

  23. admission rate due to cardiovascular events

    Time frame: 12 months

    number of admisisons due to cardiovascular events during the follow-up period

  24. admission rate due to infection

    Time frame: 12 months

    number of admissions due to infection during the follow-up period

  25. mortality rate

    Time frame: 12 months

    number of deaths during the follow-up period

  26. 5-D itch scale

    Time frame: 12 months

    Symptomatology scale to measure itchiness

  27. Numeric rating scale for itchiness

    Time frame: 12 months

    Symptomatology scale to measure itchiness

  28. The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) score

    Time frame: 12 months

    measurement scale for appetite

  29. Visual analogue scale for appetite

    Time frame: 12 months

    measurement scale for appetite

  30. Postdialysis recovery time

    Time frame: 12 months

    number of time required to feel well after receiving a hemodialysis session

  31. Self-reported sleep quality

    Time frame: 12 months

    scale to rate the quality of sleep

  32. Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Time frame: 12 months

    measurement of cognitive function

  33. KDQOLSFTMv1.3 questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months

    quality of life assessment

  34. DNA methylation analysis of TRPV1 gene

    Time frame: 12 months

    epigenetics modification

  35. DNA methylation analysis of LY96 gene

    Time frame: 12 months

    epigenetics modificaiton

  36. DNA methylation analysis of IFNGR1 gene

    Time frame: 12 months

    epigenetics modifications

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Other

Collaborators

  • Baxter Healthcare Corporation

Registry information

Official study title

The Comparison of Expanded Dialysis With Theranova Dialyzer With Conventional High-flux Hemodialysis

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Sep 27, 2019
Registry last updated
Sep 29, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.