Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University
Cairo, 1156, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04397094
Light cured silicate based cement (theracal LC) pulpotomy was compared to formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 year–7 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Cairo, 1156, Egypt
sixty primary molars were either treated with Theracal LC or formocresol pulpotomy. Teeth were followed up clinicaly and radiographically for 12 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
pulpotomy
Pulpotomy
Time frame: 12 months
Number of participants with tooth mobility, restoration loss, gingival swelling/fistula, pain on percussion.
Time frame: 12 months
Number of participants showing teeth with inter-radicular bone resorption, periapical bone resorption, internal root resorption, external root resorption, widening of periodontal ligament space.
Ain Shams University
Other
Theracal Versus Formocresol Pulpotomy in Primary Molars
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06348953
Caries; Dentin, Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04052685
Deep Caries, Dental Caries
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05167123
Decayed Teeth, Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04005872
Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details