CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens, 80054, France
NCT Number: NCT02848534
The "gold standard" for diagnosing a bacterial infection is isolation of the pathogenic germ, which is not easy in routine clinical practice.
Conventional markers do not have sufficient diagnostic value for making a rapid diagnosis on admission. A 2004 literature calculated the diagnostic values of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels for the diagnosis of bacterial infections, relative to other causes of inflammation. For CRP, the sensitivity was 75% (95% CI: 62%-84%) and the specificity was 67% (95% CI: 56%-77%). For PCT, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 62%-84%) and the specificity was 81% (95% CI: 67%-90%).
The first cellular immune response to infection consists of the mobilization of polynuclear neutrophils from the bone marrow to the infection site under the effect of pre-inflammatory cytokines, as well as the apoptosis of lymphocytes and their sequestration at the infection site. This results in lymphopenia and the elevated polynuclear neutrophil count (PNN) observed in bacterial infections.
Hence, it is legitimate to hypothesize that the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be used in the diagnosis of bacterial infection. This ratio's value in the diagnosis of sepsis in the emergency department was studied and the researchers found higher diagnostic values than for CRP and PCT.
The NLR's potential value in the diagnosis of a bacterial infection in a context of fever or hyperthermia (regardless of the presence or absence of bacteraemia) has not been studied before. This ratio could also be compared with standard biomarkers (CRP and PCT levels, the white blood cell count and the PNN).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Amiens, 80054, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in the diagnosis of bacterial infections
Time frame: 1 day
To compare the NLR with other commonly used inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients admitted for fever and/or inflammatory syndrome to an internal medicine department.
Time frame: 1 day
To compare the NLR with other commonly used inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients admitted for fever and/or inflammatory syndrome to an internal medicine department.
Time frame: 1 day
To compare the NLR with other commonly used inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients admitted for fever and/or inflammatory syndrome to an internal medicine department.
Time frame: 1 day
To compare the NLR with other commonly used inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients admitted for fever and/or inflammatory syndrome to an internal medicine department.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Other
Acronym: RNL-MI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04823026
Bacteremia, Bacterial Infections
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT00515034
Abdominal Abscess, Abscess
View Trial DetailsNCT07470541
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Montpellier, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06838780
Actinomycetales Infections, Active Tuberculosis
Hong Kong
View Trial Details