Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00129636

The Usefulness of Patients Receiving Their Own Letter After an Outpatient Attendance

As part of the NHS plan it has been proposed to extend some consultants' usual practices and to send all patients copies of the letters sent to their general practitioners (GPs) following outpatient consultations. The current Secretary of State for Health has further extended this proposal and suggested that patients should have a specific letter to themselves after a hospital consultation.

The aim of this study is to send patients both a copy of the letter sent to their GPs and a specific letter to themselves and to assess the usefulness and comprehensibility of each.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

NHLI Imperial College

London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom

About this study

As part of the NHS plan it has been proposed to extend some consultants' usual practices and to send all patients copies of the letters sent to their general practitioners following outpatient consultations. The current Secretary of State for Health has further extended this proposal and suggested that patients should have a specific letter to themselves after a hospital consultation.

The aim of this study is to send patients both a copy of the letter sent to their GPs and a specific letter to themselves and to assess the usefulness and comprehensibility of each. This study will assess the two styles of letter in Cardiology and Respiratory Outpatient Clinics staffed by 7 consultants and will involve a group of 15-20 patients from each of the clinics, total number approximately 150 patients.

All patients attending the clinics will be given a sheet outlining the study before their consultations. If they are interested in the study, patients will be given a Patient Information Sheet and asked consent to take part. The length of each of the two dictated letters will be recorded. To avoid costs to the NHS, the direct to patient letters will be typed at the study investigators' cost. Two copies of each letter, a short explanatory letter and a questionnaire will be sent to the patient and the patient will be asked to circle points in each of the letters which are unclear and return them to the department. At the end of the study the general practitioners will be contacted and asked their views about the two letters.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients attending respiratory/cardiology outpatient clinics

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with reading/language difficulties

Treatment and study plan

Additional specific letter written to patient

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comprehensibility of the two styles of letter

    Time frame: Baseline

    (length, reading ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade, items misunderstood)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient preferences for the letters

    Time frame: baseline

    Patients indicated a preference for either the GP and patient letter or both

  2. Deficiencies in the patient letter

    Time frame: baseline

    Deficiencies highlighted by the GP on the patient letter

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Study to Determine the Usefulness of Patients Receiving Their Own Letter After an Outpatient Attendance Compared to Receiving a Copy of the Letter Being Sent to Their General Practitioner

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2005
Study completion
2005
First posted
Aug 12, 2005
Registry last updated
Oct 4, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.