Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01166360

The Usefulness of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15) for Risk Stratification in Cardiac Surgery

Growth determination factor 15 (GDF-15) and high sensitive troponin-t (hsTnT) are emerging humoral markers for risk stratification in clinically stable heart failure patients and in patients with stable coronary artery disease. No data are available about the prognostic value of these peptides in relation to mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Primary objective of the present study is to test the hypothesis, that GDF-15 is superior to a standard preoperative risk score, the additive Euroscore for the prediction of 30 day mortality and postoperative morbidity in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery.

Secondary objectives are to test the predictive value of hsTNT, either alone, or in combination with GDF-15 and if GDF-15 adds additional information to NTproBNP levels and preoperative cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2) levels.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Luebeck

Lübeck, 23568, Germany

About this study

The study will be based on 2 patient cohorts, a group of patients studied during an observation period (2009) and a validation cohort of patients studied in 2008. The 2009 cohort (about 800 patients) will be analyzed to determine the predictive value of GDF-15 for predicting mortality and morbidity. The 2008 cohort (about 1200 patients) will be used to validate these findings.

Besides conventional morbidity markers, new sensitive markers of organ dysfunction (FABP, NGAL, sFLT-1, PIGF) will also be tested in the 2009 group.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for cardiac surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Withdrawal of informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. 30 day mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

    The predictive accuracy of GDF-15 will be compared with the Euroscore. Since the Euroscore has been calibrated for 30 day mortality, this time frame will be used as primary outcome parameter.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1 year mortality

    Time frame: 365 days

    1 year mortality is a more relevant outcome variable than 30 day mortality

  2. Renal dysfunction defined according to AKI-criteria

    Time frame: 30 days

    Renal dysfunction is an important outcome variable in cardiac surgery.

  3. MaC score as combined measure of postoperative morbidity

    Time frame: 30 days

    The MACS is a combined score for postoperative complications: low cardiac output syndrome, need for renal replacement therapy, stroke, reintubation.

  4. Sensitive markers of organ dysfunction

    Time frame: 4 days

    Fatty acid binding protein, neutrophyil gelatinase associated lipocalin are sensitive markers of organ dysfunction and shall be used to give more precise information on organ dysfunction.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Luebeck

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Prognostic Relevance of Cerebral Oxygen Saturation, NTproBNP and Preoperative Creatinine Clearance in Cardiac Surgical Patients; Amendment 4: the Prognostic Relevance of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15) and High Sensitive Troponin-t (hsTnT)

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jul 21, 2010
Registry last updated
Mar 15, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.