Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03608982

The Use of Simulated Patients During Basic-first Aid Courses for Laypeople

Background: Teaching first aid to laypeople is a cost-effective way to improve public health. However, it is currently unclear what the most effective ways are to teach first aid. It has already been shown that simulated patients have an added value in teaching emergency care to healthcare professionals.

This paper describes the protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial that will investigate the influence of using a simulated patient during basic first aid training for laypeople on laypeople's knowledge, skills and self-efficacy.

Hypothesis: The null hypothesis of this research is that the use of simulated patients during basic first aid training does not result in a statistically significant change in knowledge, skills and self-efficacy concerning the first aid topics for which a simulated patient is used. The alternative is that knowledge, skills and self-efficacy will be influenced by using simulated patients.

Methods: This study will be a cluster-randomized controlled trial, that will take place from September 2018 to June 2020. The study population will consist of employees taking a three day first aid certification course with the Belgian Red Cross. The employers requesting a first aid course will be randomised in receiving a course with or without simulated patient. The simulated patient will only be used for the topics first aid for burns and first aid for stroke in the intervention group. The participants will complete a questionnaire to measure their knowledge and self-efficacy before and after the course, and complete a practical skills test after the course testing these first aid topics. To test whether the retention of first aid knowledge and self-efficacy is influenced by using a simulated patient during a certification course, participants following a refresher course one year after the certification course will complete a follow-up questionnaire.

This cluster-randomized controlled trial will be, to the investigator's knowledge, the first to investigate the added value of simulated patients during first aid courses for laypeople.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Burns Brain Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Cerebrovascular Disorders Nervous System Diseases Stroke Vascular Diseases Wounds and Injuries

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Belgian Red Cross

Mechelen, Antwerpen, 2800, Belgium

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Employed in a company requesting a basic first aid course taught by the Belgian Red Cross

Exclusion criteria

  • Employed in a company that purposefully requests a simulated patient
  • Employed in a company that requests a course in a language other than Dutch (French, English)
  • Participants < 16 years of age

Treatment and study plan

simulated patient

Other

The simulated patient is a professional actor and Belgian Red Cross employee, who combines acting distress and pain with moulage, to mimic the injuries as truthfully as possible. For feasibility reasons, the simulant will only be included in two sections of the course: the respective treatments of burns and stroke. The remainder of the course will be taught without simulated patient by the professional first aid tutors.

No simulated patient

Other

Instead of a simulated patients, participants get to watch video clips on first aid techniques.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in first aid knowledge, measured as the change in average score on a questionnaire of 10 questions (multiple choice) related to first aid topics for which a simulated patient was used during the basic first aid course.

    Time frame: At the start of the basic first aid course and at one year follow-up, right before the participants follow their yearly refresher course (between 10 months and 14 months after the basic first aid course).

    10 multiple choice questions testing knowledge concerning first aid for burns and stroke, blended in with 10 questions for other first aid topics for the purpose of blinding the participants

  2. First aid skills, measured during a practical skills test evaluating a total of 14 skills concerning the first aid topics for which a simulated patient was used during the basic first aid course

    Time frame: At the end of the basic first aid course, during the evaluation moment in the afternoon of the final day of the three-day course.

    Practical skills concerning first aid for burns and stroke, blended in with practical skills tests for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and two other first aid topics for the purpose of blinding the participants.

  3. Change in first aid self-efficacy, measured as the change in average score on a questionnaire of 6 questions (5-point Likert scale), related to first aid topics for which a simulated patient was used during the basic first aid course.

    Time frame: At the start of the basic first aid course and at one year follow-up, right before the participants follow their yearly refresher course (between 10 months and 14 months after the basic first aid course).

    6 questions to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale, testing self-efficacy concerning first aid for burns and stroke, blended in with 6 questions concerning self-efficacy for other first aid topics for the purpose of blinding the participants.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in first aid knowledge, measured as the change in average score on a questionnaire of 10 questions (multiple choice) related to first aid topics for which a simulated patient was used during the basic first aid course.

    Time frame: At the start of the basic first aid course and at the end of the basic first aid course, during the evaluation moment in the afternoon of the final day of the three-day course.

    10 questions testing knowledge concerning first aid for burns and stroke, blended in with 10 questions for other first aid topics for the purpose of blinding the participants.

  2. Change in first aid self-efficacy, measured as the change in average score on a questionnaire of 6 questions (5-point Likert scale), related to first aid topics for which a simulated patient was used during the basic first aid course.

    Time frame: At the start of the basic first aid course and at the end of the basic first aid course, during the evaluation moment in the afternoon of the final day of the three-day course..

    6 questions to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale, testing self-efficacy concerning first aid for burns and stroke, blended in with 6 questions concerning self-efficacy for other first aid topics for the purpose of blinding the participants.

  3. Participant's satisfaction with the basic first aid course provided, measured using a 10-point scale

    Time frame: At the end of the basic first aid course, during the evaluation moment in the afternoon of the final day of the three-day course.

    Participant's general satisfaction concerning the basic first aid course they received will be verified using a 10-point scale (ranging from 1: not satisfied at all to 10: very satisfied).

  4. Costs

    Time frame: At the start of the basic first aid course, immediately after the basic first aid course, during the evaluation moment, and at one year follow-up, right before the participants follow their yearly refresher course (between 10 months and 14 months)

    Costs associated with a course, relatively to the gain in knowledge and self-efficacy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgium

Other

Collaborators

  • Belgian Red Cross

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating the Impact of Simulated Patients on Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes of Laypeople Following a Basic First-Aid Course: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Aug 1, 2018
Registry last updated
May 23, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.