J-Plasma
DeviceDermal resurfacing procedure with J-Plasma.
Other names: Cold Helium Plasma
NCT Number: NCT03286283
This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of J-Plasma in the reduction of facial wrinkles and rhytides. It is a multi-center, single arm, evaluator-blind prospective study of 55 study subjects who are seeking a procedure to reduce the appearance of wrinkles and rhytides and will be conducted at up to 5 investigational centers in the United States. Each study subject will receive one procedure with J-Plasma at enrollment. Follow-up will occur immediately following the procedure, at 10 days, 1, 3, and 6 months after enrollment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Miami Plastic Surgery, Miami, Florida, United States
The study objective is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the J-Plasma system for use in dermal skin resurfacing.
This is a multi-center, single arm, evaluator-blind prospective study of 55 study subjects who are seeking a procedure to reduce the appearance of wrinkles and rhytides at up to 5 investigational centers in the United States.
Study subjects that meet study eligibility criteria and have provided informed consent will be enrolled in the study. During the procedure, the investigators will use J-Plasma on applicable facial zones to reduce wrinkles and rhytides.
Study subjects will be followed immediately following the procedure, at 10 days, 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure for study assessments.
Study enrollment is expected to occur over 3-6 months. Imaging and study assessments will continue through 6 months post-procedure. Total study duration is expected to be approximately 9-12 months.
Primary study endpoints will be assessed at 3 months following the procedure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dermal resurfacing procedure with J-Plasma.
Other names: Cold Helium Plasma
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
The comparison of the proportion of subjects (i.e. percentage of treatment responders) with a ≥ 1-score improvement on the FWS at the 3-month visit, as compared to baseline as determined by at least 2 out of 3 blinded Independent Photographic Reviewers. Min=1, Max=9, where 1 is best and 9 is worst. The larger the difference between the baseline and 3 month scores, the greater the improvement.
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Adverse event rates, categorized by duration
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Assessment of modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at the 3-month visit compared to baseline as assessed by the investigator. Scale ratings: "Very much improved," "Much improved," "Improved," "No change," "Worse," "Much worse," and "Very much worse." An "improvement" on the modified GAIS includes "Improved," "Much improved," or "Very much improved."
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
The evaluation of the pain and discomfort after treatment as reported by the subject on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Mean change in VAS from baseline to 3 months. 0 = best possible level of pain and discomfort, 10= worst possible level of pain and discomfort.
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWS) ≥ 1-score improvement and ≥ 75% agreement with at least an "improved" rating by the subject on the modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at 3 months compared to baseline. FWS Scale: Min=1, Max=9, where 1 is best and 9 is worst. The larger the difference between the baseline and 3 month scores, the greater the improvement. Modified GAIS Scale ratings: "Very much improved," "Much improved," "Improved," "No change," "Worse," "Much worse," and "Very much worse." An "improvement" on the modified GAIS includes "Improved," "Much improved," or "Very much improved."
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Magnitude of improvement measured by the mean change in Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWS) from baseline to 3-month visit. Scale of 1 to 9 where 1 represents the lowest severity of wrinkles and 9 represents the greatest severity of wrinkles. Negative change value represents aesthetic improvement.
Time frame: 3 Months
Evaluation of the subject satisfaction as reported by the subject on a visual analog scale (VAS). VAS scale ranges 0-10, 0 = best possible level of satisfaction, 10= worst possible level of satisfaction
Time frame: 10 Days
Achievement of re-epithelialization by facial zone and across facial zones after treatment
Time frame: 1 Month
Achievement of re-epithelialization by facial zone and across facial zones after treatment
Time frame: 3 Months
Achievement of re-epithelialization by facial zone and across facial zones after treatment
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Mean duration for study subject to feel comfortable in public after treatment as reported by the subject
Time frame: Pre-procedure, post-procedure and Daily through 10 Day Follow-up Visit, approximately 9-14 days
Daily 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain assessments following treatment through the 10 day follow-up visit by diary day with a change from the VAS pain score at baseline. The 10 day follow-up visit window was 9-14 days. Not all participants recorded their VAS score every day on the daily diary; daily diary was collected from each participant at their 10 day follow-up visit (visit window: 9-14 days).
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
The proportion of subjects (i.e. percentage of treatment responders) with correct identification of 3-month images, in comparison to baseline, as determined by at least 2 out of 3 blinded Independent Photographic Reviewers.
Apyx Medical
Industry
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Arm Clinical Study Evaluating the Use of J-Plasma® for Dermal Resurfacing
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07618468
Facial Wrinkles, Lipid Metabolism Disorders
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07617350
Facial Lipoatrophy, Facial Wrinkles
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07572331
Acne, Acne Vulgaris
Beverly, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06657365
Anti-Aging, Facial Wrinkles
Beijing, China
View Trial Details