Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion
DeviceACDF
Other names: ACDF
NCT Number: NCT04469231
A multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, historically controlled study. Demonstrate the Synergy Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) in subjects who are symptomatic at only one level from C3 to C7 that are unresponsive to conservative management. Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Follow-up will continue annually until the last patient reaches 24-month follow-up. The primary analysis will occur at 24 months.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Barrow Brain and Spine, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
The proposed investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, historically controlled comparison of the Synergy Disc to the control of conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in patients with cervical DDD. A total of 175 patients will be enrolled to the investigational group. The investigational group results will be compared to a historical control data from the ACDF control group, which utilized an identical study design. A statistically rigorous observational study design using propensity score (PS) subclassification will be used to demonstrate covariate balance and enhance the quality of inferences regarding effectiveness and safety relative to ACDF control. After investigational device enrollment is complete, but before most investigational device subjects have reached their 24-month endpoint, a data set containing only baseline covariates of prospectively enrolled investigational device patients and historical ACDF control patients will be constructed. The propensity score methods detailed below will be implemented by an outcomes-blinded statistician. A Propensity Score Memo summarizing the proposed observational design will be developed and submitted for review by stakeholders including FDA. The outcomes-blinded statistician will remain blinded until after consensus is achieved that the design is acceptable. This will allow for additional outcomes-blinded PS modeling if required. The objective of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the Synergy Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional ACDF to treat cervical DDD in subjects who are symptomatic at only one level from C3 to C7 that are unresponsive to conservative management.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
ACDF
Other names: ACDF
Time frame: 24 Month
≥ 15-point improvement in NDI Score (out of 100) in subjects at 24 months compared with baseline
Time frame: 24 Month
Maintenance or improvement in neurological status (motor and sensory only) at 24 months compared to baseline
Time frame: 24 Month
No study failure due to secondary surgical interventions (revision, removal, re-operation, supplemental fixation) at the index level
Time frame: 24 Month
Absence of major device related adverse events defined as radiographic failure, neurological failure, or failure by adverse event as adjudicated by the CEC.
Time frame: 6 Week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 Month
Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline and at each follow-up time-point
Time frame: 6 Week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 Month
Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate pain where a change of at least 20mm will be considered clinically significant. Neck pain as measured on a 100mm VAS at baseline and at each follow-up time-point. Left and Right arm/shoulder pain as measured on a 100mm VAS at baseline and at each follow-up time-point. Please note, this assessment will include a "Worst" to pool together the left or right arm/shoulder scores with the higher baseline score. VAS Hoarseness on a 100mm scale.
Time frame: 6 Week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 Month
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 Week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 Month
Bazaz Dysphagia Score at 24 months compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 Week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 Month
Results at 24 months for the investigational Synergy Disc and at 24 months for the control ACDF will also be categorized by the physician according to Odom's Criteria.
Synergy Spine Solutions
Industry
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Historically Controlled Pivotal Trial Comparing The Safety And Effectiveness Of The Synergy Disc To Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion In Patients With One-Level Symptomatic Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD).
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05740176
Bone Diseases, Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06995300
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Stenosis
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT04122248
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Disc Herniation
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06383962
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Birmingham, United Kingdom
View Trial Details