Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
NCT Number: NCT02952222
The primary aim of this study is to compare the propofol requirements of children who receive propofol with that of children who receive dexmedetomidine prior to propofol, for sedation for upper and lower endoscopic procedures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me7 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Both propofol and dexmedetomidine may be used to achieve adequate sedation conditions. Propofol has been described to produce successful conditions for completion of the intended study in almost 99% of the patients. However, in a study that reviewed outcomes when using propofol for almost 50,000 pediatric procedures, propofol was associated with stridor, laryngospasm, airway obstruction, wheezing or central apnea at a rate of 1 in 65 sedations. The need for airway and ventilation interventions which include oral/nasal airway placement, positive pressure mask ventilation and tracheal intubation occurred at a rate of 1 in 70 sedations. Hemodynamic and respiratory fluctuations of a minimum of 30% fluctuations in heart rate, blood pressure or respiratory rate occurred at a rate of 1 in 165 sedations. Another recent study cited similar incidences of hemodynamic variability with propofol as well as inhalational anesthesia in the outpatient pediatric setting.
Until 2015, dexmedetomidine had been one of the standard drugs administered for sedation in children who require radiologic diagnostic imaging studies (MRI, CT and Nuclear Medicine) in the Department of Radiology at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH). Over 17,000 infants, children and developmentally compromised young adults had been sedated with dexmedetomidine in BCH without a cardiac or respiratory arrest, or a need to provide positive pressure assisted ventilation.
This study will determine if administration of dexmedetomidine with propofol administration will result in lower doses of the latter, which may mean safer outcomes in sedation for upper and lower endoscopic procedures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients in Group DP will receive 0.5 mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine (DEX) administered over 1 minute followed by an infusion of 0.15 mcg/kg/hr. Following the 0.5 mcg/kg DEX bolus, propofol will be administered with the identical protocol (with same endpoint of Bispectral Index (BIS) 40-50) of the P Group. Propofol infusion will be started at 200 mcg/kg/min and will be titrated throughout the procedure to maintain a BIS 40-50. Propofol may be administered prn in 10-20 mg increments for any abrupt patient movement which may compromise the continuity of the procedure.
Other names: Precedex
Patients in Group P will receive intravenous propofol in bolus increments (2.0 mg/kg bolus over one minute then 0.5 mg/kg bolus q 1 minute titrated to a BIS of 40-50). These patients will be maintained with a continuous intravenous infusion of propofol starting at 200 mcg/kg/min and will be titrated to an endpoint of maintaining a BIS level of 40-50.
Patients in Group DP will receive 0.5 mcg/kg DEX administered over 1 minute followed by an infusion of 0.15 mcg/kg/hr. Following the 0.5 mcg/kg DEX bolus, propofol will be administered with the identical protocol (with same endpoint of BIS 40-50) of the P Group. Propofol infusion will be started at 200 mcg/kg/min and will be titrated throughout the procedure to maintain a BIS 40-50. Propofol may be administered prn in 10-20 mg increments for any abrupt patient movement which may compromise the continuity of the procedure.
Time frame: up to 3 hours
Compare the total propofol requirements (in mg/kg/min) of children who receive intravenous propofol with pre-treatment of dexmedetomidine with the propofol requirements in children who do not receive dexmedetomidine.
Time frame: 1 day
To compare propofol to dexmedetomidine with respect to the frequency of adverse events and the need for airway interventions
Time frame: up to 30 minutes
To compare propofol to dexmedetomidine with respect to the time required to receive sedation
Time frame: up to 4 hours
To compare the propofol-only group to dexmedetomidine-propofol group with respect to the time required to meet discharge criteria from recovery room
Time frame: 3 days
To compare the propofol-only group to dexmedetomidine-propofol group with respect to adverse events
Time frame: up to 3 hours
To compare the propofol-only group to dexmedetomidine-propofol group with respect to the need for unplanned airway interventions
Time frame: up to 4 hours
To compare the propofol-only group to dexmedetomidine-propofol group with respect to the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score. The PAED is a scale that measures emergence delirium in children and adolescence as they wake up from anesthesia. The lowest achievable score is 0 and is consistent with no emergence delirium (best outcome). The highest achievable score is 20 and is consistent with emergence delirium (worse outcome).
Time frame: up to 6 hours
To compare the propofol-only group to dexmedetomidine-propofol group with respect to time (in minutes) of return of BIS score to baseline (pre-sedation level) in recovery room
Time frame: up to 3 hours
To compare the propofol-only group to dexmedetomidine-propofol group with respect to the duration of sedation
Keira Mason
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06993740
Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Diseases
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT07259629
Anesthesia, Glucose Metabolism Disorders
Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT03972423
Anesthesia, Anesthesia Complication
Versailles, IDF, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05111340
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Anesthesia
Arras, France
View Trial Details