Taxus polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent
DeviceTwo different types of stents (paclitaxel-eluting and a similar bare metal stent) are being compared in saphenous vein graft lesions.
Other names: Taxus drug-eluting stents
NCT Number: NCT00247208
The main purpose of this study is to determine whether implantation of a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus™) in saphenous vein graft lesions will reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis after 12 months when compared to a similar bare metal stent.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
Introduction: The prevalence of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is high in the veteran population. Saphenous veins are used as conduits in the majority of CABG operations. Compared to arterial conduits, saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) have a high rate of failure, requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or repeat CABG. Bare metal stents are currently used in the majority of PCI in SVGs because they increase the procedural success rate and decrease restenosis. However, even with the use of bare metal stents, restenosis still occurs in 37-53% of the SVGs, often requiring repeat target vein graft revascularization.
Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been a major breakthrough in percutaneous coronary intervention because they significantly reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis in de novo lesions of native coronary arteries. Even though, no randomized controlled trials have compared DES with bare stents in SVG interventions, DES are increasingly being used off label in this setting, based on registry data. DES are expensive and may not provide benefit in SVGs since the atherosclerotic process is different in SVGs and in native coronary arteries. We propose to compare the 12-month angiographic restenosis rates after implantation of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent or the Express-2 bare metal stent (which is identical to the paclitaxel-eluting stent but has no drug coating) in saphenous vein graft lesions.
Hypothesis: Compared to implantation of a bare metal stent, implantation of a similar paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus™, Boston Scientific, Nattick, Massachusetts) in saphenous vein graft lesion will reduce the incidence of angiographic in-stent restenosis after 12 months.
Specific objectives: We propose to randomize patients undergoing stenting of a saphenous vein graft lesion to a bare metal stent or an identical paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus™) in order to determine:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Two different types of stents (paclitaxel-eluting and a similar bare metal stent) are being compared in saphenous vein graft lesions.
Other names: Taxus drug-eluting stents
Two different types of stents (paclitaxel-eluting and a similar bare metal stent) are being compared in saphenous vein graft lesions.
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months for IVUS and 24 months for clinical follow-up
Time frame: 12 months for IVUS and 24 months for clinical follow-up
North Texas Veterans Healthcare System
Fed
The SOS (Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Randomized-controlled Trial of a Paclitaxel-eluting Stent vs. a Bare Metal Stent in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00911976
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07587307
Coronary Artery Bypass
Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07470034
Cardiac Rehabilitation, Coronary Artery Bypass
Gaziantep, şehitkamil, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05726019
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details