NCT Number: NCT06023680
The goal of this behavioral clinical trial is to compare two different ways of becoming less sedentary and more active in 60 older adults at elevated risk of becoming frail.
The main question this project aims to answer are whether participants in each intervention are able to gradually replace 30 minutes of sedentary (sitting-like) behavior with very light walking over 60 days.
There are other questions this project aims to answer that include:
1. whether it is easier to replace sedentary behavior with one 30-minute walking bout or three 10-minute walking bouts 2. whether becoming less sedentary and more active leads to feeling better, have less stress, pain, and fatigue and have more confidence in becoming more regularly active 3. whether becoming less sedentary and more active leads to better regulation of inflammation and metabolism
Participants will be randomized into one of two sedentary reduction behavior programs; one program that gradually replaces sedentary time with one 30-minute walking bout and the other program that gradually replaces sedentary time with three 10-minute walking bouts in the morning, afternoon, and evening. Researchers will compare both programs to see which one is easier to achieve and maintain over 60 days.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Initiating and maintaining habitual physical activity is difficult for sedentary older adults, particularly those encumbered by health challenges. The 2018 US Physical Activity Guidelines recommends that all adults perform ≥150 minutes/week of physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviors. Yet, traditional approaches to increase physical activity do little to address sedentary behavior reduction, especially for older adults. Lower sedentary behavior is associated with improved biological and psychosocial health-independent of meeting physical activity guidelines. Thus, there remains a critical need to implement and evaluate a structured way to reduce sedentary behavior as a potential pathway for habitual physical activity engagement.
This project aims to test two prescribe-able and feasible strategies to initiate and incorporate sedentary behavior reduction into daily lifestyle with remote monitoring. The interventions are an inexpensive and low burden approach to reduce sedentary behavior and promote habitual physical activity. Moreover, accelerometer-based outcomes of sedentary behavior are novel in intervention settings, particularly when measured in free-living, real-world settings. Lastly, this project directly addresses a gap of successful remotely deployable interventions geared to initiate and build activity into daily life by replacing sedentary time among older adults.
Aim 1. Explore the effectiveness of 2 interventions to reduce sedentary time in pre-frail older adults over 2 months
Hypothesis 1a. Each intervention will reduce objectively measured daily sedentary time from baseline levels over 2 months.
Hypothesis 1b. The continuous intervention will result in more reduction of objectively measured sedentary time than the bouts intervention.
Aim 2. Explore the dose-response relationship between sedentary time changes and patient-reported outcomes that include fatigue, fatigability, anxiety, general and exercise-based self-efficacy, stress, pain, and mood over 2 months
Hypothesis 2: Decreased daily sedentary time over 2 months is associated with decreased fatigue, fatigability, anxiety, stress, and pain, and increased general and exercise-based self-efficacy and mood over 2 months.
Aim 3. Explore the dose-response relationship between sedentary time changes and biomarkers of frailty-related inflammation, including serum interleukin (IL-6) (pg/mL) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -alpha receptor 1 (pg/mL) over 2 months
Hypothesis 3. Decreased daily sedentary time is associated with decreased serum (IL-6) and TNF-alpha receptor 1 over 2 months.
Aim 4. Explore the dose-response relationship between changes in sedentary time with biomarkers of glucose and lipid metabolism (glucose, insulin, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC)), a cytokine marker related to frailty (Growth/Differentiation Factor-15; (GDF-15), hemoglobin A1C (hbA1c), non-esterified free fatty acid, and untargeted metabolomics-based markers of energy regulation.
Hypothesis 4. Decreased daily sedentary time is associated with decreased levels of blood glucose, insulin, TC, LDLC, triglycerides and increased HDLC, decreased GDF-15, decreased hbA1c, decreased non-esterified free fatty acid, and lower circulating metabolites necessary for energy regulation over 2 months.
Aim 5. Explore the dose-response and diurnal relationships between changes in sedentary time and interstitial glucose continuously monitored over 24 hours for 14 consecutive days using a Libre Pro sensor at baseline and 2 months later
Hypothesis 5. Decreased sedentary time is associated with decreased overall glucose and different time-of-day glucose levels, coefficient of variation, % of time in glucose at various ranges (e.g., ≥200, ≥180, ≥140, 70-180, 70-140, <70, <54 mg/dL), mean daily difference, and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion) over 2 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
During Phase 1, one minute of sedentary time will be replaced with very light to light intensity walking at three different times during the day, every day for 10 days, reaching three separate 10-minute walking intervals (or bouts).
During Phase 2, the three 10-minute walking bouts will be gradually combined into one 30-minute bout over the course of 20 days.
During Phase 1, one minute of sedentary time will be replaced with very light to light intensity walking at three different times during the day, every day for 10 days, reaching three separate 10-minute walking intervals (or bouts).
During Phase 2, the three 10-minute walking bouts will be maintained over the course of 20 days.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Sedentary time measured with a wrist worn monitor containing an accelerometer sensor
This measurement is collected under a 7-day/24-hour wear protocol at baseline and again 2 months afterwards to determine the change in sedentary time before and after either intervention.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Comparing the 2-month change in sedentary time between the two interventions
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Physical activity fragmentation (e.g., broken up activity accumulation) wrist worn monitor containing an accelerometer sensor
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Ability to walk measured at a usual walking pace for 400m at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Walking speed measured at a usual walking pace for 4m at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Fatigue measured using a Fatigue Scale questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-13 where higher scores mean higher fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Fatigability measured using a Pittsburgh Fatigability questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-100 where higher scores mean higher fatigability.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Anxiety measured using an Anxiety Scale questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-20 where higher scores mean higher anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
General Self Efficacy measured using a General Self Efficacy questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards
On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-50 where higher scores mean higher general self efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Exercise-based Self Efficacy measured using an Exercise-based Self Efficacy questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-90 where higher scores mean higher exercise-based self efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Stress measured using a Perceived Stress Scale questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-70 where higher scores mean higher stress.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Pain measured using a modified version of the McGill pain questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-5 where higher scores mean greater pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Mood measured using a Profile of Mood Status questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-20 where higher scores mean greater mood disturbance.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Inflammation measured from blood draws quantifying serum IL-6 (pg/mL) and TNF-alpha receptor 1 (pg/mL) at baseline and 2 months afterwards
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Blood glucose measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Insulin measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Total cholesterol measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Triglycerides measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Growth/Differentiation Factor-15 measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Untargeted metabolomics-based markers of energy regulation measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Hemoglobin A1c measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Non-Esterified Free Fatty Acid measured from blood draws
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months
Interstitial glucose measured using a continuous glucose monitor worn 24-hours each day for 14 consecutive days at baseline and 2 months afterwards. Specific measurements include overall glucose and different time-of-day glucose levels, coefficient of variation, % of time in glucose at various ranges (e.g., ≥200, ≥180, ≥140, 70-180, 70-140, <70, <54 mg/dL), mean daily difference, and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion).
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Other
The Sedentary to Active Rising to Thrive (START) Trial: A Proof-of-Concept Sedentary Behavior Reduction Program
Acronym: START
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06626295
Behavior, Exercise
Palavas-les-Flots, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05935241
Behavior, Cognition Disorders
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05970588
Behavior, Blood Pressure Regulation
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05316571
Behavior, Sedentary Behavior
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details