Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
NCT Number: NCT00728481
The primary aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients with esophageal eosinophilic infiltration that have objective (measurable) evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
This study was also done to see if patients that have eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) and GERD would receive relief from taking the medication Nexium or a steroid called Pulmicort.
The study also evaluated the accuracy of pH monitoring (acid exposure) within the esophagus as a predictor of endoscopic, histological and symptomatic response in patients with EE.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Hypotheses:
Participants were randomized based on results of a 24 hour pH study, which determined the average percent time the distal esophagus was exposed to a pH of less than than 4. Subjects with a positive pH result were randomized to esomeprazole or randomized to budesonide, if there was a negative pH result. Studies were interpreted by a single gastroenterologist experienced in reading esophageal pH studies. The percent time the pH monitor detected a pH less than 4 was recorded and an esophageal pH of less than 4 for 4% or greater of the study time was considered abnormal. Note: pH is a measure of acidity or alkalinity (lower numbers are more acid, higher numbers are more alkaline).
Those subjects with GERD (positive pH result) received gastric acid-suppressing medication (esomeprazole 40 mg, twice daily) for 6 weeks. Subjects who did not have GERD (negative pH result) were treated with a corticosteroid designed to coat the esophagus (budesonide suspension 1 mg twice daily) for six weeks. Response to treatment was assessed by esophageal histology and symptoms.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Proton pump inhibitor; Nexium 40mg capsule taken twice daily by mouth for 6 weeks
Other names: Nexium
Corticosteroid therapy; oral viscous Pulmicort Respules 1 gram taken by mouth orally twice daily (mixed with 1 gram packet of Sucralose [Splenda-registered trademark]) for 6 weeks in subjects with negative 24 hour pH studies (without GERD)
Other names: Pulmicort
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Subjects with Esophageal eosinophilia experiencing a histological response to treatment. Subjects were considered to have histological response to treatment if both sets of biopsies (from the distal and mid-esophagus) had, on average, less than 5 eosinophils per high power field (eos/hpf) at the 6-month biopsies.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Subjects with Esophageal eosinophilia experiencing a response in their dysphagia symptoms to treatment. Symptomatic improvement in symptoms was defined as a score of at least two levels lower than the baseline dysphagia symptom question on the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-30 days (MDQ-30).
Dysphagia symptoms were determined based on the MDQ-30 question: 'How would you rate the severity of your trouble swallowing in the past 30 days' with a 5 point scale ranging from 'does not bother me at all' to 'very severe, markedly affects my lifestyle'. Patients must have marked a score of 3 or higher corresponding to 'Moderate, cannot be ignored, but does not affect my lifestyle' to be included in the study.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Dysphagia symptoms were determined based on the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-30 days (MDQ-30), using the question: 'How would you rate the severity of your trouble swallowing in the past 30 days' with a 5 point scale ranging from 'does not bother me at all' to 'very severe, markedly affects my lifestyle'. Symptomatic improvement was defined as only an improvement of 2 levels on this question.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Dysphagia symptoms were determined based on the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-30 days (MDQ-30), using the question: 'How would you rate the severity of your trouble swallowing in the past 30 days' with a 5 point scale ranging from 'does not bother me at all' to 'very severe, markedly affects my lifestyle'. Patients must have marked a score of 3 or higher corresponding to 'Moderate, cannot be ignored, but does not affect my lifestyle' to be included in the study.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Multiple concentric rings or furrows of the esophagus is an endoscopic finding traditionally ascribed to eosinophilic esophagitis.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Mayo Clinic
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07227506
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07506746
Achalasia, Deglutition Disorders
Milan, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT01921686
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03069573
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial Details