University of Zurich
Zurich, 8006, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT04371146
Approach versus avoidance decisions are at the centre of adaptive behaviour and survival. These decisions are thought to be guided by the value of the choice options, which are a function of the magnitude of predicted rewards and punishments. Moreover, the allocation of attention to choice options is thought to be driven by salience, i.e. the overall importance of the predicted outcomes. While salience increases with the magnitude of both predicted rewards and predicted punishments, value increases with reward but decreases with punishment. In previous research, value and salience have often remained confounded during value-based decision making. Rodent research suggests that value is associated with dopamine and salience with norepinephrine. The present study aims at disentangling value from salience processing during decision-making tasks in healthy subjects by administering dopamine or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. This is done by using a single dose challenge in a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design, administering either methylphenidate (35 mg), reboxetine (8 mg), or placebo to healthy young participants before they perform tasks tapping into various aspects of value and salience.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Zurich, 8006, Switzerland
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
35 mg methylphenidate (Ritalin®) is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
Other names: Ritalin®
8 mg Reboxetine (Edronax®) is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
Other names: Edronax®
A placebo pill is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
Other names: Placebo Pill
Time frame: These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
The investigators record responses and specifically reaction times during 5 different decision-making tasks.
In a value vs salience task, value and salience processing is disentangled during value-based decision-making. Participants either accept or reject compound stimuli that were before associated with monetary outcomes.
In a face in the crowd task, participants detect a target face (angry vs happy) in a crowd of opposite face type.
During a task on risk and ambiguity decision-making, participants have to decide between safe and lottery options associated with either monetary risk or ambiguity.
In an adaptive risk-taking task, participants have to choose between two risky monetary options.
In an effort task, participants decide whether they are willing to exert physical effort for monetary reward.
Response times are measured in milliseconds from the tasks. The investigators calculate how long participants take to make decisions in each trial.
Time frame: These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
As a dependent variable the investigators record responses and specifically choices made during the above-mentioned different decision-making tasks. The investigators evaluate what kind of answers were made during each trial of the decision-making tasks, in respect to correctness or preference (percentage).
Time frame: These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Computational parameters are mathematically estimated from the data of participants during the above-mentioned decision-making tasks. Specifically, mathematical models will be applied to choice data (percentage).
Time frame: These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Computational parameters are mathematically estimated from the data of participants during the above-mentioned decision-making tasks. Specifically, mathematical models will be applied to response time data (milliseconds).
University of Zurich
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06702423
Healthy
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07223164
Healthy
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05595902
Healthy
Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details