Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01852396

The Retroclavicular Approach for Regional Anesthesia

The goal of this study is to demonstrate that the novel retroclavicular approach is a safe, fast and effective technique for ultrasound-guided brachial plexus anesthesia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada

About this study

Classic infraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus involves a needle puncture below the clavicle and advancing the needle with a 45-60 degree angle from cephalad to caudad. The aim is to advanced the block needle posterior to the axillary artery and to deposit the local anesthetic at that point, near the posterior cord. A "U" shaped spread around the artery should ensure distribution around all three cords. Ultrasound guidance is highly recommended and neurostimulation is optional.

The retroclavicular approach is a variant to this classical technique. Ultrasound probe is positioned initially below the clavicle in a manner similar to the classic approach but is then rotated in a clockwise fashion (right arm) or counter-clockwise fashion (left arm) for about 25-35 degrees. The puncture site is just behind the clavicle at the most lateral point available. If initial entry point is optimal, needle direction is then parallel to ultrasound probe. The final aim and position of block needle is identical to classical approach. Entry point ensures a parallel alignment of the needle and the ultrasound beam, thus enabling almost perfect visualization of both artery, cords and block needle. This is turn optimizes safety, rapidity of technique, efficiency and efficacy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective or Urgent Surgery of the hand, wrist or forearm
  • 18 years and older
  • Ability to consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 to 3

Exclusion criteria

  • Infection at the site of infection
  • Abnormal anatomy at the site of infection
  • Coagulopathy
  • Severe Pulmonary Disease
  • Preexisting neurological symptom(s) in the operated arm
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients weighing less than 50 kg
  • Allergy to amide type local anesthetics

Treatment and study plan

Retroclavicular block

Procedure

Retroclavicular approach ultrasound guided regional anesthesia

Primary outcomes

  1. Success Rate of the Block

    Time frame: Assessed 30 minutes after block completion

    Success is defined as complete sensory loss in the distribution of the radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous, and medial cutaneous nerves of the forearm and hand.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical success rate

    Time frame: Defined at the beginning of surgery until the end of surgery

    Success rate is defined as avoidance of rescue analgesic technique. These techniques are defined as: adding local anesthetic locally by surgeon, rescue intravenous narcotics in excess of 1 microgram per kilogram of patient weight, need for general anesthesia, rescue distal neural blockage by anesthesiologist. Data presented will be the need or not of a rescue analgesic technique

  2. Technique duration

    Time frame: Time required in seconds for the retroclavicular block technique completion, assessed during block performance

    Number of seconds needed to complete the block, from time of local skin anesthesia until regional block needle removal (local skin anesthesia plus injection of mepivacaine)

  3. Needle visualization

    Time frame: Assessed after study completion, once all 50 patients will have been completed. Assessment will take place in the weeks following study completion

    Using the Likert standardized scale, two evaluators will individually quantify the ease of needle visualization using the video footage recorded by the ultrasound machine from all the retroclavicular blocks. Likert scale for visualization, is defined as: 1:very bad, 2: bad, 3: adequate, 4:good, 5: very good. No units are attached to this scale

  4. Patient discomfort

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after the block

    Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), patients will quantify the discomfort they experienced during the block. This assessment will take place in the minutes following mepivacaine injection and block needle withdrawal. The VAS scale is rated from 1-10, 1 being almost no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever.

    Assessment will be done by an independent person, not taking part in the study. The VAS has no units attached to it.

  5. Patient satisfaction

    Time frame: Assessed 48 hours after the block

    Using a VAS, patients will quantify their satisfaction with the retroclavicular technique throughout the study period.

  6. Sensitive Block Progression

    Time frame: Assessed 10, 20, 30 minutes after the block

    Progress of the sensory block in the distribution of the radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous, and medial cutaneous nerves of the forearm and hand at 10, 20 and 30 minutes after block completion (mepivacaine injection). The scale used is: 0:no sensitive block, 1:analgesia, 2:anesthesia. No units are attached to this scale.

  7. Motor Block Progression

    Time frame: Assessed 10, 20, 30 minutes after the block

    Progress of the motor block in the distribution of the radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous nerves of the forearm and hand at 10, 20, and 30 minutes after block completion (mepivacaine injection). The scale used is: 0: no motor block, 1: paresis, 2: paralysis. No units are attached to this scale

  8. Complication Rate

    Time frame: Assessed 48 hours after the block

    With a phone call to the patient at 48 hours after injection of mepivacaine, complications will be searched for (pain at puncture site, paresthesia or paresis in the operated arm, signs of infection at puncture site such as redness or purulent discharge). Response is classified as YES or NO. No units attached to this scale. If patient reports paresthesia or paresis, further questioning over the phone will determine which nerve or cord is involved.

  9. Duration of the Block's Effects

    Time frame: Assessed 48 hours after the block

    Duration of the block will be evaluated using 3 criteria: patient's subjective opinion of when the block receded (time of the day), time at which first oral analgesia is taken, and time of first onset of pain. Units involved is time (for example "3 pm".)

  10. Use of narcotic for tourniquet pain

    Time frame: Assessed throughout the surgery

    If at any point during the surgery, patient complains of tourniquet pain, this will be noted as well as the analgesia given. Units is time of pain ("3 pm") and analgesia given ("micrograms of fentanyl").

  11. Rate of Neurostimulation Usage

    Time frame: Assessed during the block

    At the discretion of the anesthesiologist performing the block, neurostimulation can be used to supplement ultrasound guidance. This will be recorded as a YES or NO (neurostimulation used or not). No units attached to this rate.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Université de Sherbrooke

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Regional Anesthesia by the Novel Retroclavicular Approach : A Feasibility Study

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
May 13, 2013
Registry last updated
Aug 13, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.