Malatya Training and Research Hospital
Malatya, 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06934850
This comparative, cross-sectional observational study examined handgrip strength, trunk muscle endurance, and functional mobility in adolescents aged 12-18 years with mild intellectual disability and compared their performance with typically developing peers. A total of 51 participants were evaluated during a single assessment session, including 24 adolescents with mild intellectual disability and 27 typically developing adolescents. Handgrip strength was measured using a digital hand dynamometer, trunk muscle endurance was assessed using the McGill trunk endurance test battery, and functional mobility was evaluated using the Timed Up and Go Test and the Timed Up and Down Stairs Test. The study also examined the relationships among handgrip strength, trunk muscle endurance, and functional mobility.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year–18 year
All sexes
Observational
Malatya, 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Design
This was a comparative, cross-sectional observational study. Participants were not assigned to any treatment, exercise program, or other intervention. All assessments were completed during a single study visit, and no 8-week intervention or follow-up assessment was conducted.
Participants
The study included 51 adolescents aged 12-18 years. The mild intellectual disability group consisted of 24 adolescents with a clinical diagnosis of mild intellectual disability according to DSM-5 criteria. The comparison group consisted of 27 typically developing adolescents without a diagnosis of intellectual disability, neurodevelopmental disorder, neurological disease, orthopedic condition, or serious systemic disease affecting assessment performance.
Assessments
Handgrip strength was measured separately for the right and left hands using a digital hand dynamometer. Three trials were performed for each hand, and the mean of the three trials was recorded in kilograms.
Trunk muscle endurance was assessed using the McGill trunk endurance test battery, including the trunk flexor endurance test, trunk extensor endurance test, right side bridge test, and left side bridge test. Performance duration was recorded in seconds.
Functional mobility was assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test and the Timed Up and Down Stairs Test. Completion times were recorded in seconds, with shorter times indicating better functional mobility.
Study Objective
The primary objective was to compare handgrip strength, trunk muscle endurance, and functional mobility between adolescents with mild intellectual disability and typically developing peers. The study also examined the relationships among these variables.
Registry Clarification
The initial registry version contained outcome-measure labels and assessment time points that did not correspond to the final assessment battery. After study completion, the record was updated to reflect the actual enrollment, the single-visit assessment schedule, and the outcome measures that were administered. Previous versions of the registry record remain accessible through the record history.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: At the single study assessment visit (Day 0)
Handgrip strength was measured separately for the right and left hands using a digital hand dynamometer. Three trials were performed for each hand in a standardized seated position, and the mean of the three trials was recorded in kilograms. Higher values indicated greater handgrip strength.
Time frame: At the single study assessment visit (Day 0)
Trunk muscle endurance was assessed in seconds using the McGill trunk endurance test battery, consisting of the trunk flexor endurance test, trunk extensor endurance test, right side bridge test, and left side bridge test. The duration for which each standardized test position was maintained was recorded in seconds. Longer durations indicated greater trunk muscle endurance.
Time frame: At the single study assessment visit (Day 0)
Functional mobility was assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test. The time required to complete the standardized test was recorded in seconds. Shorter completion times indicated better functional mobility.
Time frame: At the single study assessment visit (Day 0)
Functional stair mobility was assessed using the Timed Up and Down Stairs Test (TUDS). The time required to ascend and descend the stairs according to the standardized test protocol was recorded in seconds. Shorter completion times indicated better functional stair mobility.
Inonu University
Other
Relationship Between Handgrip Strength, Trunk Muscle Endurance, and Functional Mobility in Adolescents With Mild Intellectual Disability: A Cross-Sectional Comparison With Typically Developing Peers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07220837
Behavior, Developmental Disabilities
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04154891
Disease, Disease Attributes
Angers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05290051
Abortion, Spontaneous, Congenital Abnormalities
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01867554
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
Paris, France
View Trial Details