Urban Housing Solutions
Nashville, Tennessee, 37217, United States
NCT Number: NCT06129149
Affordable housing residents continue to experience multi-faceted insecurity and advance care planning (ACP) challenges even after obtaining secure housing, resulting in significant inequities in quality of care during times of cognitive incapacity. To promote proactive planning for affordable housing residents, this proposal is for a pilot study to test a novel trauma-informed care adapted advance care planning intervention with the following aims: to test initial efficacy of the intervention on ACP outcomes (Aim 1) and determine resident perceptions of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators (Aim 2). These data will support the development of a larger scale study of ACP interventions within a resiliency-based hub model to comprehensively support whole-person care and proactive planning for times of cognitive incapacity.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nashville, Tennessee, 37217, United States
Long-term objectives and goals. Vanderbilt University School of Nursing (VUSN) and Urban Housing Solutions (UHS) - the second largest provider of affordable housing in Nashville - are partners with the long-term goal of reducing health disparities among medically-underserved UHS residents in Nashville. This partnership is developing resiliency hubs that will provide essential services and support within a communal setting at the housing facility. Previous literature and data findings support that similar populations to this community lack information about and access to advance care planning (ACP), which specifies their healthcare wishes during cognitive incapacitation or end-of-life, and nationwide research shows significant disparities regarding ACP participation among low-income populations. The short-term goal of the proposed work is to pilot test a Hybrid type 1, single-arm, pre-post intervention to assess the initial efficacy and implementation outcomes of a trauma-informed care (TIC)-adapted ACP intervention to improve learning and communication for times of decisional incapacity among UHS residents, within the context of a resiliency hub model. This is a necessary first step for developing a long-term research portfolio dedicated to addressing ACP disparities and promoting equitable end-of-life planning among low-income, medically-underserved populations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention will consist of a single one- to two-hour visit wherein the PI (Kimpel) will facilitate a flexible conversational approach with the resident (and, optionally, a healthcare decision-maker) in a quiet, private location in the resiliency hub. Using a conversation checklist adapted from a narrative synthesis of advance care planning (ACP) guides (Fahner et al., 2019), the PI will explore ACP with participants and use each visit to continually adapt the checklist and approach with trauma-informed care (TIC) principles: safety, trustworthiness and transparency, peer support, collaboration and mutuality, empowerment, and choice, and cultural, historical, and gender issues. Adverse Childhood Experiences and previous death-related experiences assessed during baseline data collection will be used to tailor the discussion to carefully explore relevant history to assess resident ACP values, preferences, and goals.
Time frame: Baseline to 30 days
Advance Care Planning Values/Beliefs Scale, Possible scores: 7-35, Higher summed scores are worse, indicating a higher number of advance care planning misconceptions
Time frame: Baseline to 30 days
Advance Care Planning Processes Scale; Possible scores: 15-75; Higher summed scores are better and indicate higher participation in advance care planning processes
Time frame: Baseline to 30 days
Stages of Change for Advance Care Planning Behaviors Scale; Possible Scores: 0-24; Higher summed scores are better and indicate higher levels of advance care planning participation.
Time frame: 30-day post-intervention follow-up (Visit 3)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure: Possible scores: 4-20; Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
The result is the percentage of the participants who had a score ≥15 as hypothesized
Time frame: 30-day post-intervention follow-up (Visit 3)
Intervention Appropriateness Measure: Possible scores: 4-20; Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
The result is the percentage of the participants who had a score ≥15 as hypothesized
Time frame: 30-day post-intervention follow-up (Visit 3)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure: Possible scores: 4-20; Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
The result is the percentage of the participants who had a score ≥15 as hypothesized
Vanderbilt University
Other
Resources for Resiliency (R4R) Advance Care Planning: A Pilot Study to Test a Trauma-Informed Care-adapted Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Affordable Housing Residents in Nashville
Acronym: R4RACP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06035549
Advance Care Planning, Neoplasms
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05625906
Advance Care Planning
Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT06247215
Advance Care Planning
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06061965
Advance Care Planning, Resilience, Psychological
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details