Wheaton Francsican Cancer Care - All Saints
Racine, Wisconsin, 53405, United States
NCT Number: NCT01408706
The purpose of this study is to compare reproducibility of the device position and location of the prostate rectum interface between two immobilization devices for radiation therapy of prostate carcinoma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Racine, Wisconsin, 53405, United States
The investigator assessed the device position and location of the interface between rectum and prostate weekly during the course of treatment. This information was obtained using a conebeam CT scan on the treatment couch prior to a regularly scheduled radiation treatment. The conebeam CT scan is a standard tool for monitoring patient position and radiation treatment accuracy. Prior to each radiation treatment, the patient was placed in a vaclock immobilization device, then aligned with room lasers to skin tattoos. On board portal imaging was then employed using the KvKv match technique to place isocenter as simulated. For intact prostate treatment, alignment was made to implanted gold fiducial markers. For post prostatectomy patients, the alignment was to pelvic bony anatomy. After patient alignment was complete, a conebeam CT scan was obtained. The position of the anterior rectal wall and the interface between prostate and rectum was compared to the position of these structures at the time of simulation. Measurement was taken in the midline of the prostate gland between its base and apex of the maximum deviation of the rectum prostate interface from its position at the time of simulation. For post prostatectomy patients, a measurement was taken of the maximum deviation from simulation of interface between the rectum and the prostate bed/bladder. These measurements were recorded weekly by the treating radiation oncologist on the Physician Data Sheet.
The difficulty of device insertion, positioning and inflation was recorded daily by the treating personnel based on a scale in the PIDS Daily Radiation Therapist Questionnaire, from 1(none) to 5(unable to insert). These results were summarized by the clinical study coordinators on the PIDS Radiation Therapist Summary.
Patient expression of discomfort during device placement was recorded daily by treating personnel based on a scale in the PIDS Daily Radiation Therapist Questionnaire, from 1(none) to 5(intolerable). These responses will be summarized by the clinical study coordinators on the PIDS Radiation Therapist Summary.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Miller Enema Air Tip is inserted into rectum prior to simulation and each radiation treatment.
Other names: Miller Enema Air Tip
Radiadyne Immobilizer is inserted into rectum prior to simulation and each radiation treatment
Time frame: Up to 9 weeks
Measurements will be taken for at least 5, and up to 9, occasions on a weekly basis during each patient's course of treatment. An average value will be determined for each patient. An average of individual patient values will be determined for each immobilization device.
Time frame: Up to nine weeks
Difficulty of device insertion was scored for each treatment by the treating radiation therapist on a scale from 1(easiest) to 5(most difficult). An average score was obtained at completion of therapy for each patient. At completion of the study, an average value was obtained for each immobilization device by averaging the average score for each patient .
Time frame: Up to nine weeks
Patient expression of discomfort was scored for each insertion by the treating radiation therapist on a scale from 1(none) to 5(intolerable). An average score was obtained at completion of therapy for each patient. At completion of the study, an average value was obtained for each immobilization device by averaging the average score for each patient .
James Taylor
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02217709
Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate, Genital Diseases
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01402154
Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
Nîmes, Gard, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02048150
Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate, Genital Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02761889
Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
Lisbon, Portugal
View Trial Details