NCT Number: NCT02832492
The Prognostic Value of Pupil Near Response in UWS Patients
Previous studies suggest that the stimulus of pupil near response (PNR) may be a conscious perception of a blurred image. Moreover, PNR is a reflex that can be objectively observed and with no motor output, suggesting it might be a more convenient index for consciousness evaluation and consciousness recovery in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). We thus hypothesized that PNR+ patients (patients show PNR during the assessment) would have better prognosis than PNR- patients (patients fail to show PNR during the assessment).Based on this hypotheis, researchers will assess pupil near response in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and compare the prognosis difference between PNR+ patients and PNR- patients to assess its prognosis value.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
6 year–85 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
About this study
PNR assessments will be conducted in patients with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS) diagnosed by the Coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R).An objective index,the ratio of pupillary constriction (pupil diameter change after a stimulus presentation divided by the resting state pupil diameter) will be used as the measure of PNR's presence (positive results indicate the presence of PNR,whereas negative results indicate the absence of PNR).According to the presence of PNR,patients will be divided into 2 groups,one includes patients who show PNR during the PNR assessment (PNR+),the other includes patients who fail to show PNR during the PNR assessment(PNR-).3 months later,a follow-up will be conducted to obtain their prognosis in the form of another CRS-R assessment.Patients diagnosed as Minimally Conscious State (MCS) will be considered as favourable prognosis,patients diagnosed as UWS will be considered as unfavourable prognosis.Their prognosis difference will then be compared to see PNR's effect on their prognosis (consciousness recovery). And for they couldn't show conscious visual behaviors (visual behaviors in CRS-R which indicate MCS) in the first CRS-R,their difference between visual prognosis (difference between each group's proportion of patients showing conscious visual behavior diagnosed by CRS-R in the follow up) will be compared to see PNR's capability to predict prognosis in patients without voluntary eye movements (conscious visual behaviors in CRS-R require voluntary eye movements).
Researchers expect to see the PNR+ group have better prognosis in both comparison.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (diagnosed by CRS-R)
- normal or corrected to normal vision before the incidence (myopia did not exceed 300 degrees Fahrenheit, farsightedness was less than + 2.00 d)
- positive pupil light reflex.
Exclusion criteria
- nystagmus and drooping eyelids
- unstable vital signs
- under sedation during PNR test.
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Each group's proportion of MCS patients diagnosed by CRS-R in the follow up
Time frame: 3 months after pupil near response assessment in this study
Greater proportion in PNR+ group suggests PNR has prognostic value to DOC patients thus has relationship with consciousness
Secondary outcomes
-
Each group's proportion of recovery of conscious visual function diagnosed by visual subscale of CRS-R in the follow up
Time frame: 3 months after pupil near response assessment in this study
Greater proportion in PNR+ group suggests PNR can correct misdiagnosis caused by lesions on motor systems thus is applicable to patients without motor function
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Wentao Zeng
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Does Pupil Near Response Have Prognostic Value in Patients With Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome?
Important dates
- Study start
- 2015
- Primary completion
- 2016
- Study completion
- 2016
- First posted
- Jul 14, 2016
- Registry last updated
- Aug 4, 2022
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Post-coma Patients With Disorders of Consciousness
NCT04065386
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Brabant Wallon, Belgium
View Trial DetailsExcitatory Prefrontal Weak Current Stimulation in Vegetative Patients
NCT04614792
Anoxic Brain Damage, Brain Damage, Chronic
Jerusalem, Israel
View Trial DetailsEye Tracking Technology in the Diagnosis of Neurological Patients
NCT05536921
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Częstochowa, Poland
View Trial DetailsThe Use of LIFUP in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness
NCT04921683
Anoxia, Brain, Brain Damage, Chronic
Pomona, California, United States
View Trial Details