Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00733928

The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Metal-backed Versus All-poly

The primary objective of this investigation was to evaluate & compare the performance of the P.F.C. Sigma Knee Cruciate-retaining all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components using RSA.

The secondary objectives of this investigation are to evaluate the clinical and patient outcomes and survivorship associated with the P.F.C. Sigma Knee Cruciate-retaining all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Department of Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom

About this study

Using RSA, is it possible to evaluate the performance of both the all polyethylene and metal backed tibia components to determine whether there are differences in migration, if present, across the tibial components.

The original protocol intended to perform clinical assessment using the Nottingham Knee Score and the Knee Society Clinical rating system pre-and post-operatively, at six months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. Per Protocol Amendment 01 (effective June 18, 1999) clinical data would also be collected via the SF-12 questionnaire. Radiological evaluation would also use the Knee Society scoring system at the same time points. However, data collected included only the SF-12 and Oxford Knee Scores, comparing change from baseline at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects requiring a primary knee replacement.
  • Subjects aged 65 years or more.
  • Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained.
  • Subjects with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects who have had a previous surgery of the operative knee except menisectomy and arthroscopy.
  • Subjects who have had a renal transplant.
  • Subjects with a metabolic bone disorder.
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, have an existing condition, e.g. Paget's disease etc. that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this clinical investigation.
  • Subjects whose contralateral knee is already included in this study.
  • Subjects who have a history of active joint sepsis.
  • Subjects who have a recent history of high dose systemic corticosteroids.
  • Subjects with psycho-social disorders or physical disabilities that would limit rehabilitation.
  • Subjects requiring a bone graft.

Treatment and study plan

PFC Sigma knee with all-poly tibial component

Device

Orthopaedic implant for total knee replacement with an all-polyethylene tibial component

PFC Sigma knee with metal backed tibia

Device

Orthopaedic implant for total knee replacement with a metal-backed tibial component

Primary outcomes

  1. Using RSA it is possible to evaluate the performance of both the all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components to determine whether there are differences in migration between the two components

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparative evaluation of any post-operative variation between subjects receiving all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components in change from baseline at each post operative time points in terms of SF 12 and OKS

    Time frame: 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

DePuy International

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Randomised Prospective Comparison of P.F.C All-polyethylene Versus Metal-backed Tibial Component. A Clinical, Radiological and Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) Study.

Important dates

Study start
1999
Primary completion
2005
Study completion
2015
First posted
Aug 13, 2008
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.