Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07395713

The Predictability of the Necessity for Cardiology Consultation in Patients Scheduled for Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Models in Preoperative Anesthesia Assessment

Structured Summary Title

Predictability of Cardiology Consultation Requirement in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Models

Background

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment is essential for minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cardiology consultations are often requested to assess surgical eligibility and reduce complication risks. However, unnecessary consultations may contribute to inefficient healthcare resource utilization and procedural delays.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, have demonstrated potential in clinical decision support systems. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2024 guidelines provide a structured framework for evaluating perioperative cardiac risk. This study aims to investigate whether AI-based models can assist in predicting the need for cardiology consultation and to examine the effect of prompted versus non-prompted input formats on AI recommendations.

Study Design

Prospective, observational, comparative study.

Ethical Approval

The study has been approved by the Bursa City Hospital Ethics Committee and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sample Size

Sample size was calculated using G*Power software based on anticipated effect size and statistical power requirements.

Participants

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 18 years or older

ASA physical status I-IV

Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery

Evaluated by anesthesia residents with less than two years of clinical experience

Exclusion Criteria:

Pediatric patients

Patients declining participation

Incomplete clinical data

Data Collection

The following patient data will be recorded:

Demographics (age, sex, BMI)

Medical history (comorbidities, medication use, allergies, substance use)

Functional capacity (METs score)

ECG findings

Chest radiography findings

Planned surgical procedure characteristics

AI Model Evaluation

Multiple AI language models will be tested using standardized patient scenarios. Each scenario will be presented in two formats:

Prompted format:

"You are a 10-year experienced anesthesiologist. According to ESC 2024 guidelines, evaluate whether this patient requires cardiology consultation."

Non-prompted format:

"Evaluate whether this patient requires cardiology consultation."

AI recommendations will not influence clinical decision-making.

Outcome Measures

Primary and secondary analyses will include:

Agreement between AI recommendations and expert anesthesiologist evaluations

Readability of AI-generated responses

Quality assessment of responses

Classification performance comparisons across models

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses will be performed using appropriate comparative and agreement tests. Readability and quality scores will be analyzed using non-parametric methods where applicable. ROC analysis will be used to assess classification ability. A significance level of p < 0.05 will be applied.

Study Objective

The objective of this study is to explore the feasibility of AI-assisted decision support systems in predicting cardiology consultation requirements and to evaluate whether prompt engineering influences AI performance.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Bursa Şehir Hastanesi

Bursa, 16001, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Structured Summary Title

Predictability of Cardiology Consultation Requirement in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Models

Background

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment is essential for minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cardiology consultations are often requested to assess surgical eligibility and reduce complication risks. However, unnecessary consultations may contribute to inefficient healthcare resource utilization and procedural delays.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, have demonstrated potential in clinical decision support systems. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2024 guidelines provide a structured framework for evaluating perioperative cardiac risk. This study aims to investigate whether AI-based models can assist in predicting the need for cardiology consultation and to examine the effect of prompted versus non-prompted input formats on AI recommendations.

Study Design

Prospective, observational, comparative study.

Ethical Approval

The study has been approved by the Bursa City Hospital Ethics Committee and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sample Size

Sample size was calculated using G*Power software based on anticipated effect size and statistical power requirements.

Participants

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18 years or older

ASA physical status I-IV

Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery

Evaluated by anesthesia residents with less than two years of clinical experience

Exclusion criteria

Pediatric patients

Patients declining participation

Incomplete clinical data

Data Collection

The following patient data will be recorded:

Demographics (age, sex, BMI)

Medical history (comorbidities, medication use, allergies, substance use)

Functional capacity (METs score)

ECG findings

Chest radiography findings

Planned surgical procedure characteristics

AI Model Evaluation

Multiple AI language models will be tested using standardized patient scenarios. Each scenario will be presented in two formats:

Prompted format:

"You are a 10-year experienced anesthesiologist. According to ESC 2024 guidelines, evaluate whether this patient requires cardiology consultation."

Non-prompted format:

"Evaluate whether this patient requires cardiology consultation."

AI recommendations will not influence clinical decision-making.

Outcome Measures

Primary and secondary analyses will include:

Agreement between AI recommendations and expert anesthesiologist evaluations

Readability of AI-generated responses

Quality assessment of responses

Classification performance comparisons across models

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses will be performed using appropriate comparative and agreement tests. Readability and quality scores will be analyzed using non-parametric methods where applicable. ROC analysis will be used to assess classification ability. A significance level of p < 0.05 will be applied.

Study Objective

The objective of this study is to explore the feasibility of AI-assisted decision support systems in predicting cardiology consultation requirements and to evaluate whether prompt engineering influences AI performance.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18 years or older

ASA physical status classification I-IV

Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery

Patients evaluated preoperatively by anesthesia residents with less than two years of clinical experience

Availability of complete clinical data including medical history, ECG findings, and chest radiography

Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Patients younger than 18 years of age

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Patients with incomplete clinical data

Patients who declined participation

Emergency surgery cases

Patients unable to undergo standard preoperative evaluation

Treatment and study plan

Patient scenarios were presented to different AI models (ChatGPT 4.5, ChatGPT 5, Copilot, Deepseek, Grok, Claude, Gemini Flash, Gemini Pro) with and without prompts.

Other

Responses:

Compared with expert opinion according to the ESC 2024 guidelines

Evaluated using the Ateşman readability score and the Global Quality Scale (GQS)

Primary outcomes

  1. Agreement Between AI Model Recommendations and Expert Anesthesiologist Decision Regarding Cardiology Consultation Requirement

    Time frame: At baseline preoperative evaluation (Day 1)

    The level of agreement between artificial intelligence model recommendations and expert anesthesiologist evaluations for cardiology consultation necessity will be assessed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient based on ESC 2024 guidelines.

Other outcomes

  1. Readability of AI-Generated Responses

    Time frame: Immediately after AI-generated response evaluation (Day 1)

    The readability of AI-generated responses will be assessed using the Ateşman Readability Index to determine clarity and comprehensibility of consultation recommendations.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bursa City Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

The Effectiveness of Using Artificial Intelligence (Chat GPT) in Cardiac Assessment During Anesthesia Examination of Preoperative Cases

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.