Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03702244

The PRECISE Protocol: Prospective Randomized Trial of the Optimal Evaluation of Cardiac Symptoms and Revascularization

The study will be a prospective, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of the comparative effectiveness of diagnostic evaluation strategies for stable CAD, to be performed in outpatient settings, including primary care and cardiology practices.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Participating site

Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601, United States

About this study

Objective was to test a modified initial cCTA strategy (PS) designed to improve clinical efficiency vs usual testing (UT). Patients from 65 North American and European sites with stable symptoms of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and no prior testing were randomly assigned 1:1 to precision strategy PS or UT. PS incorporated the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for the Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) minimal risk score to quantitatively select minimal-risk participants for deferred testing, assigning all others to cCTA with selective CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT). UT included site-selected stress testing or catheterization. Site clinicians determined subsequent care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(all must be present):

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Stable typical or atypical symptoms suggesting possible significant coronary artery disease (CAD) with further non-emergent testing or elective catheterization recommended to evaluate the presence of suspected significant CAD. Stable chest pain (or equivalent) includes those who have fully been ruled out for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and for whom elective testing is recommended, regardless of the venue in which they are seen.
  • If prior CV testing has occurred, it must have been performed greater than one year prior to randomization, and the following must be met:
  • cCTA or invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with stenosis < 50%
  • Quantified coronary artery calcium (CAC) < 100 AG
  • Safe performance of cCTA:
  • Creatinine clearance ≥45 ml/min per most recent measurement within 90 days
  • For a female participant of childbearing potential (those who have not been surgically sterilized or are not postmenopausal), a pregnancy test must be performed with negative results known within 7 days prior to randomization
  • Willingness to comply with all aspects of the protocol, including adherence to the assigned strategy and follow-up visits
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

(all must be absent):

  • Acute chest pain (in patients who have not been ruled out for ACS)
  • Unstable clinical status
  • Noninvasive or invasive CV testing for CAD within 1 year. CV testing for CAD refers to any stress tests, invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and cCTA (including calcium scoring) only.

a. Resting ECG, resting echocardiogram and resting CMR (MRI) are not exclusionary regardless of when were performed

  • Lifetime history of known obstructive CAD (prior myocardial infarction, CABG or PCI, stenosis ≥50%), known EF ≤40% or other moderate to severe valvular or congenital cardiac disease
  • Contraindications to cCTA including but not limited to creatinine clearance (GFR) <45 ml/min as per most recent measurement taken within 90 days
  • Exceeds the site's weight or size limit for cCTA or cardiac catheterization
  • Any condition leading to possible inability to comply with the protocol procedures or follow-up
  • Any condition that might interfere with the study procedures or follow-up
  • Enrolled in an investigational trial that involves a non-approved cardiac drug or device which has not reached its primary endpoint
  • Life expectancy less than 2 years due to non-cardiovascular comorbidities

Treatment and study plan

cCTA with selective FFRct

Diagnostic Test

PRECISE will evaluate whether a precision evaluation strategy that combines contemporary risk stratification using the PROMISE Risk Tool with functional and anatomic non-invasive evaluation with cCTA with selective FFRct can improve outcomes over usual care in stable chest pain patients while safely deferring further testing in low-risk patients and reducing cost overall

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Composite (Number) of Deaths / MIs / Invasive Coronary Angiography Without Obstructive Disease

    Time frame: 1 year

    The centrally adjudicated (by Clinical Events Committee) primary end point was a composite of clinical efficiency as a gatekeeper to invasive testing (catheterization without obstructive CAD) and safety (death, non fatal myocardial infarction [MI]) at 1 year. Invasive cardiac catheterization without obstructive coronary artery disease defined as the absence of any ≥50% stenosis or hemodynamic indication of significance (no FFR ≤0.80 or iFR≤0.89) in any major epicardial vessel including side branches ≥2 mm in diameter, as determined by core-lab adjudicated quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) or if QCA not performed, by site report. A detailed description and information on the definitions of primary endpoint component definitions is provided in the current version of the study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and the published trial design article.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Unplanned Hospitalizations (Including Admissions With Death or MI)

    Time frame: 1 year

    Urgent and unscheduled hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes include hospitalization for ischemic heart disease including myocardial infarction and unstable angina, cerebrovascular disease including stroke and TIA, heart failure, acute and/or critical limb ischemia, other thrombotic events including pulmonary embolism, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest and other clear cardiovascular causes for hospitalization that do not meet the criteria for the specific events listed here (e.g., hospitalization for acute cardiac chest pain that does not meet the criteria for MI or UA).

  2. Number of Catheterization and Revascularization Procedures

    Time frame: 1 year

    Catheterization efficiency was defined as the proportion of invasive cardiac catheterization patients who undergo revascularization (PCI or CABG) within 6 months. Revascularization may occur either percutaneously (PCI) or surgically (CABG) or as hybrid (PCI and CABG). For PCI, any intervention on a lesion in the coronary tree (including angioplasty, stenting, intravascular lithotripsy) whether successful or not will be considered a revascularization. For CABG the start of the surgical procedure (skin incision) was considered as CABG, whether the procedure was successful or not. Staged revascularization was considered as one revascularization event.

  3. Number of Participants With Preventive Medication Use

    Time frame: 1 Year

    Lipid-lowering agents included statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors. Antiplatelet agents included aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel. Antihypertensive medications included calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitor, beta blockers, nitrates, or diuretics.

  4. Number of Participants With Quality of Life (Angina Frequency) Assessment

    Time frame: 1 year

    Overall health status was assessed briefly using the EQ-5D-5L, a standardized generic measure that can also be used to link specific health states to general population-based utilities. The EQ-5D-5L consists of two parts: (1) a descriptive assessment of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each of which can take one of five responses corresponding to the level of severity within each dimension, and (2) a self-rating 0- 100 "thermometer" of current health-related quality of life. The proportion of participants with frequent angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score <80).

  5. Cumulative Radiation Exposure From All Cardiovascular Procedures (12 M), MilliSievert (mSv)

    Time frame: 1 year

    The cumulative radiation exposure over the 12 months following Randomization was calculated based on each participant's exposure to radiation for cardiovascular care. If data are missing in > 80% or more of the diagnostic and procedural testing, a single fixed estimate of radiation based on the literature will be used to impute. Given high missingness in catheterization data, a fixed estimate of 6.6 mSv and 4.1 mSv was used for catheterization with and without revascularization, respectively, based on recent trial data.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

HeartFlow, Inc.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Randomized Trial of the Optimal Evaluation of Cardiac Symptoms and Revascularization

Acronym: PRECISE

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Oct 11, 2018
Registry last updated
Dec 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.