Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03061071

The POSAtive Study: Study for the Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized crossover of the NightBalance SPT compared to APAP for the treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea (POSA).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sleep Disorders Center of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized crossover of the NightBalance SPT compared to APAP for the treatment of POSA.

The Primary Objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of treatment with the SPT as compared to APAP.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is between the ages of 20 and 80.
  • Diagnosis of POSA meeting all the following criteria per in-lab control PSG (performed within 3 months of screening):
  • Total AHI >15, or AHI >10 and <15 with ESS >10
  • Supine AHI at least twice the non-supine AHI
  • Non-supine AHI <10 (<5 in mild patients)
  • Supine time >40% and <60%
  • Subject understands the study protocol and is willing and able to comply with study requirements and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior surgery to treat OSA (such as UPPP), or prior or current therapy or treatment for OSA, with the exception of PAP being used for split night PSG only.
  • A female of child-bearing potential that is pregnant or intends to become pregnant.
  • Any unstable or severe medical condition of any organ system including congestive heart failure, COPD, renal failure, neuromuscular disease, or at the discretion of the site Principal Investigator (PI).
  • Taking medication that may affect sleep, sleepiness, or alertness including hypnotics, sedatives, alerting agents, stimulants, opiates, sedating antidepressants, and anticonvulsants.
  • Oxygen use.
  • The presence of any other sleep disorder (central sleep apnea (CSA >5), periodic limb movement disorder (PLMAI >15), clinical diagnosis of insomnia or narcolepsy).
  • Excessive alcohol consumption (>21 drinks/week).
  • The use of any illegal drug(s).
  • Night or rotating shift work.
  • Severe claustrophobia.
  • Shoulder, neck, or back complaints that restrict sleeping position.
  • Subject requires use of more than 2 pillows under the head while sleeping or sleeps in a bed/chair with raised upper body position.

Treatment and study plan

NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT)

Device

Subject to sleep with the SPT for a 6 week home use period followed by in-lab PSG.

Automated Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP)

Device

Subject to sleep with the APAP for a 6 week home use period followed by in-lab PSG.

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence (minutes of device use per night)

    Time frame: 6 week

    Non-inferiority of SPT vs. APAP (calculated by number of minutes of objective device use per night)

  2. Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI, events/hr)

    Time frame: 6 week

    Non-inferiority of SPT vs. APAP (measured by events/hr during in lab polysomnography)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP

  2. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP

  3. SF-36

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP

  4. Patient Satisfaction (Comfort, Satisfaction) assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP

  5. Oxygen Desaturation Index (3%)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP

  6. Total Sleep Time (minutes)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

  7. Sleep Onset Latency (minutes)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

  8. Sleep Efficiency (%)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

  9. Arousal Index

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

  10. Sleep Stages (%)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

  11. Sleep Position (%)

    Time frame: 6 week

    SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)

  12. Mean Disease Alleviation (MDA) (%)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    SPT vs. APAP (MDA (%) is calculated by the product of the objective adherence (from SPT and APAP download), adjusted for total sleep time (X-axis), combined with therapeutic efficacy (AHI from the respective treatment night, Y-axis), divided by 100.)

  13. Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    SPT vs. APAP, frequency, seriousness, severity and device relationship will be summarized.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NightBalance

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study of the NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) Compared to Automatic Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP) for the Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea (POSA)

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Feb 23, 2017
Registry last updated
Aug 21, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.