NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT)
DeviceSubject to sleep with the SPT for a 6 week home use period followed by in-lab PSG.
NCT Number: NCT03061071
This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized crossover of the NightBalance SPT compared to APAP for the treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea (POSA).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sleep Disorders Center of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized crossover of the NightBalance SPT compared to APAP for the treatment of POSA.
The Primary Objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of treatment with the SPT as compared to APAP.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subject to sleep with the SPT for a 6 week home use period followed by in-lab PSG.
Subject to sleep with the APAP for a 6 week home use period followed by in-lab PSG.
Time frame: 6 week
Non-inferiority of SPT vs. APAP (calculated by number of minutes of objective device use per night)
Time frame: 6 week
Non-inferiority of SPT vs. APAP (measured by events/hr during in lab polysomnography)
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)
Time frame: 6 week
SPT vs. APAP (measured by in lab polysomnography)
Time frame: 6 weeks
SPT vs. APAP (MDA (%) is calculated by the product of the objective adherence (from SPT and APAP download), adjusted for total sleep time (X-axis), combined with therapeutic efficacy (AHI from the respective treatment night, Y-axis), divided by 100.)
Time frame: 6 weeks
SPT vs. APAP, frequency, seriousness, severity and device relationship will be summarized.
NightBalance
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study of the NightBalance Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) Compared to Automatic Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure (APAP) for the Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea (POSA)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06283017
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06627127
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06283030
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05477719
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Paris, France
View Trial Details