Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07391033

The PICCOLETO XI A-PREP Study

To compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes of aggressive versus standard balloon preparation during drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The study will evaluate whether more aggressive lesion preparation with cutting/scoring/OPN balloons improves outcomes compared to standard preparation with semi-compliant or non-compliant balloons.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

PICCOLETO XI A-PREP is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, international, observational study evaluating the impact of lesion preparation strategies on outcomes following drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for in-stent restenosis (ISR).

In-stent restenosis remains a clinically relevant challenge despite advances in drug-eluting stent technology and contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention techniques. DCB represents a stentless therapeutic strategy for ISR treatment, with the advantage of avoiding implantation of additional metallic layers.

A key determinant of clinical outcomes in ISR, particularly with DCB angioplasty, is the adequacy of lesion preparation before definitive therapy. Effective preparation facilitates optimal drug delivery, improves luminal gain, and may reduce the risk of recurrent restenosis.

A large spectrum of balloon-based modalities is available for ISR lesion preparation, ranging from semi-compliant and non-compliant balloons to more aggressive tools such as scoring and cutting balloons. Although more aggressive devices may enhance plaque modification and neointimal tissue disruption, their incremental clinical benefit over standard approaches remains uncertain.

Patients will be categorized into two groups based on lesion preparation strategy:

  • Aggressive preparation: Cutting/Wolverine balloons, scoring balloons (any brand), and/or OPN balloons
  • Standard preparation: Semi-compliant balloons and/or non-compliant balloons

Clinical outcomes will be assessed at 1-year and longest available follow-up.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients ≥18 years of age
  • Patients who underwent DCB angioplasty for in-stent restenosis

Exclusion criteria

  • Lack of clinical outcome assessment

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cardiac Death

    Time frame: 12 months and longest available follow-up

    Death attributed to cardiovascular causes, including death from unknown cause.

  2. Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction

    Time frame: 12 months and longest available follow-up

    Non-fatal myocardial infarction according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.

  3. Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

    Time frame: 12 months and longest available follow-up

    Any repeat revascularization (percutaneous or surgical) of the target lesion.

  4. Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI)

    Time frame: 12 months and longest available follow-up

    Myocardial infarction attributable to the target vessel based on clinical, electrocardiographic, and biomarker criteria.

  5. BARC Major Bleeding

    Time frame: 12 months and longest available follow-up

    Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) major bleeding events (type 3-5).

  6. Procedural Success

    Time frame: At procedure

    Successful DCB angioplasty with residual stenosis less than 30% and TIMI flow grade 3 without major procedural complications.

  7. Post-procedural Diameter Stenosis

    Time frame: At procedure

    Percentage of diameter stenosis after DCB angioplasty assessed by quantitative coronary angiography.

  8. Angiographic Dissection

    Time frame: At procedure

    Presence and type of coronary dissection after lesion preparation and DCB treatment.

  9. TIMI Flow Grade

    Time frame: At procedure

    Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade assessment post-procedure.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Beatrice Barbano

CONTACT

[email protected]

Filippo Luca Gurgoglione, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+393312048150

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare ETS

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Lesion PREParation With Modifying Balloons During Drug-coated Balloon (DCB) Angioplasty for In-stent Restenosis (ISR) - PICCOLETO XI A-PREP Study

Acronym: PICCOLETO-XI

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Feb 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.