Royal Brompton Hospital
London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Lizzie JF Grillo, MSc
CONTACT
Lizzie JF Grillo, MSc
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07543588
This study aims to evaluate a clinical tool called the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool (BPAT), which is used by physiotherapists to assess breathing pattern disorder (BPD). BPD is a condition where breathing is inefficient or out of sync with the body's needs, leading to symptoms such as breathlessness.
The study will investigate whether the BPAT is a reliable and accurate way to identify and assess BPD, and whether it can be used to monitor changes over time, particularly following physiotherapy treatment. It will also compare BPAT scores with other commonly used questionnaires that measure breathlessness and breathing symptoms.
Participants will include patients with BPD, patients with asthma, and healthy individuals. Patients with BPD will attend physiotherapy sessions as part of their usual care, during which their breathing will be assessed using the BPAT at different time points, including before and after treatment. Healthy participants will attend a single assessment visit, and asthma participants' data will be collected from routine clinical care.
The study will also explore whether BPAT scores change following treatment and whether these changes reflect improvements reported by patients and clinicians.
In addition, a small number of patients and physiotherapists will be invited to take part in interviews to share their experiences of the assessment process and treatment. This will help understand whether the BPAT is acceptable and useful in clinical practice.
Overall, this study aims to improve how breathing pattern disorder is assessed and monitored, which may help guide better treatment for patients in the future.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
Location status: Recruiting
Lizzie JF Grillo, MSc
CONTACT
Lizzie JF Grillo, MSc
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
This study will evaluate the measurement properties and clinical usefulness of the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool (BPAT), a physiotherapist-completed assessment used to identify breathing pattern disorder (BPD). BPD is a condition in which breathing is inefficient or inappropriate for the body's needs and is associated with symptoms such as breathlessness.
The study aims to determine whether the BPAT is a reliable and valid method for identifying and assessing BPD, and whether it can be used to monitor changes over time, particularly following physiotherapy treatment. BPAT scores will be compared with established questionnaires that measure breathing symptoms and breathlessness. The study will also assess whether changes in BPAT scores reflect changes reported by patients and clinicians.
Participants will include patients with BPD (n=100), patients with asthma (n=25), and healthy controls (n=25). Patients with BPD will be recruited from physiotherapy outpatient services and will receive physiotherapy as part of usual care. Healthy controls will attend a single assessment visit, and asthma control data will be obtained from routine clinical assessments.
At the initial assessment, two physiotherapists will independently complete BPAT scores for each participant. Patients with BPD will attend a follow-up assessment within approximately 4 weeks, where a repeat BPAT assessment will be completed. Those diagnosed with BPD will then undergo a course of physiotherapy treatment as part of usual care, typically consisting of four sessions. BPAT and other outcome measures will be repeated at the end of treatment (up to 6 months). Patients and clinicians will also provide ratings of change in symptoms following treatment.
The study will evaluate the reliability of the BPAT between clinicians and across time, its validity through comparison with other commonly used outcome measures, and its responsiveness to change following treatment.
In addition, a subgroup of patients and physiotherapists will take part in qualitative interviews to explore their experiences of the BPAT and its use in clinical practice. These interviews will help assess the acceptability and practicality of the tool.
This mixed-methods study aims to improve the assessment and monitoring of breathing pattern disorder and to support more consistent and effective clinical care.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(Breathing Pattern Disorder group)
Patients who have Breathing Pattern Disorder will be assessed with the Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool and then will undergo Physiotherapy intervention. This includes up to 4 sessions of physiotherapy treatments which include biomechanical, biochemical and psychopathological interventions for breathing pattern
Time frame: Baseline for all participants; 4 weeks and through study completion (up to 6 months) for participants with Breathing Pattern Disorder
The Breathing Pattern Assessment Tool (BPAT) is a clinician-completed assessment of breathing pattern. Assessment components include (i) evaluation of chest/abdominal wall movement, noise of (ii) inspiratory and (iii) expiratory flow, (iv) channel of inspiration and expiration, (v) signs of air hunger (yawning, sighing and deeper breaths), (vi) RR and (vii) rhythm. Each component is scored from 0 (normal) to 2 (severely abnormal), with a total score ranging from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate greater deviation from normal breathing patterns. Changes in score over time reflect changes in breathing pattern.
Time frame: Baseline for all participants; and through study completion (up to 6 months) for participants with Breathing Pattern Disorder
The Nijmegen Questionnaire is a 16-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms associated with breathing pattern disorder and hyperventilation. Each item is scored from 0 ("never") to 4 ("very often"), with a total score ranging from 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Scores of 19 or above are commonly considered indicative of clinically significant symptoms. Changes in score over time reflect changes in symptom severity.
Time frame: Baseline for all participants; and through study completion (up to 6 months) for participants with Breathing Pattern Disorder
The Dyspnoea-12 Questionnaire is a 12-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity of breathlessness, including both physical and affective components. Each item is scored from 0 ("none") to 3 ("severe"), with a total score ranging from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate worse breathlessness (greater dyspnoea severity). Changes in score over time reflect changes in symptom severity.
Time frame: Baseline for all participants; and through study completion (up to 6 months) for participants with Breathing Pattern Disorder
The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized measure of health-related quality of life comprising a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system assesses five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each rated on five levels from 1 ("no problems") to 5 ("extreme problems"), which can be converted into a single index score. The descriptive system responses are converted into a single index score using established value sets, typically ranging from less than 0 (worse than death) to 1 (full health). The EQ VAS records self-rated health on a scale from 0 ("worst imaginable health") to 100 ("best imaginable health"). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life, while lower scores indicate poorer health status.
Time frame: Baseline for all participants; and through study completion (up to 6 months) for participants with Breathing Pattern Disorder
Breath-Hold Time (seconds) is a functional measure of respiratory control and tolerance to carbon dioxide. It is assessed as the duration, in seconds, that a participant can comfortably hold their breath following a normal exhalation. Typical values in healthy adults are approximately 20 to 40 seconds. Higher values indicate better respiratory control and greater tolerance to carbon dioxide, while lower values indicate poorer tolerance and potential breathing pattern disorder (hyperventilation). Changes in breath-hold time over time reflect changes in respiratory function. There is no fixed upper limit; values are recorded in seconds.
Time frame: Baseline for all participants; and through study completion (up to 6 months) for participants with Breathing Pattern Disorder
End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO₂, mmHg) is an objective physiological measure of the partial pressure of carbon dioxide at the end of expiration, assessed using capnography via a nasal cannula. EtCO₂ is used as an indicator of ventilatory status. Lower values indicate relative hypocapnia and potential hyperventilation, while higher values within the normal physiological range indicate improved ventilatory regulation. Changes in EtCO₂ over time reflect changes in respiratory function. Normal values are typically approximately 35-45 mmHg or 4.7 to 6.0 kPa.
Time frame: Baseline for all participants; and through study completion (up to 6 months) for participants with Breathing Pattern Disorder
The Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire (Breathe-VQ) is a 6-item patient-reported measure assessing the degree of conscious monitoring and attentional focus on breathing. Each item is rated on a Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 6 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater breathing vigilance or hyper-awareness of breathing, which is associated with dysfunctional breathing patterns. Lower scores indicate less conscious monitoring of breathing. Changes in score over time reflect changes in breathing-related vigilance.
Time frame: Baseline for all participants; and through study completion (up to 6 months) for participants with Breathing Pattern Disorder
The Self-Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire (SEBQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms associated with dysfunctional breathing. It consists of 25 items, each scored on a Likert scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 75. Higher scores indicate worse breathing pattern disorder/dysfunctional breathing. A total score greater than 11 has been suggested as indicative of possible dysfunctional breathing. Changes in score over time reflect changes in symptom severity.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Other
An Evaluation of Physiotherapy Assessment; A Mixed Methods Study to Evaluate the Physiotherapy Assessment of Breathing Pattern Disorder
Acronym: PHAB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07648082
Asthma, Asthma (Diagnosis)
Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06776263
Breathing Pattern Disorder, COVID-19
Stockholm, Solna, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06103955
Breathing Pattern Disorder, Dysfunctional Breathing
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07450885
Asthma, Breathing Pattern Disorder
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details