Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Cranston, Rhode Island, 02920, United States
NCT Number: NCT05336123
The investigators will conduct a pilot randomized clinical trial (n = 40) of hatha yoga vs. a health education group (attention control) for prisoners high in self-reported anger dysregulation. The investigators will assess feasibility and acceptability of the yoga program, the health education control group, and research procedures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cranston, Rhode Island, 02920, United States
In the criminal justice (CJ) system in the US, there are high rates of mental health and substance use disorders. Although prisons must provide treatment, the CJ system is resource-poor and the presenting problems of prisoners are diverse. To maximize efficiency in the CJ context, recent efforts focus adjunctive interventions on symptoms that are most detrimental to prisoners, and that are shared across diverse conditions. Of particular interest has been anger dysregulation, as this is prevalent in CJ-involved populations, contributing not only to distress and exacerbation of other mental health problems, but also to risk of aggression. Overt aggression further increases risk for prison behavioral infractions or placement in restraints or seclusion, and may delay parole or release decisions.
There are many limitations to existing approaches to anger management in prison. The investigators propose that hatha yoga could serve as a useful adjunctive treatment for anger within prisons. In addition to preliminary research showing that yoga programs may improve anger regulation, research has also demonstrated benefits of yoga for related symptoms of depression, anxiety, and trauma-related emotion reactivity and arousal. Yoga may be delivered in a relatively low-cost fashion. Finally, prisoners may view yoga as less stigmatizing than more traditional anger management interventions, particularly given its focus on physical body awareness/movement and on overall wellness.
Despite a recent proliferation of yoga programs for various problems in prisons, empirical research on this topic is minimal, with a small number of studies limited by significant methodological concerns. The investigators propose to conduct systematic treatment development research that would prepare us to study whether yoga (vs. a health education control group) is an effective adjunctive treatment for prisoners with anger dysregulation.
The investigators will conduct a pilot randomized clinical trial (n = 40) of hatha yoga vs. a health education group (attention control) for prisoners high in self-reported anger dysregulation. Participants will be enrolled in the active intervention for 10 weeks, and then followed for 8 weeks. The investigators will assess feasibility and acceptability of the yoga program, the health education control group, and research procedures. To assess safety, they will track all adverse events in a structured fashion. The investigators will iteratively revise manuals and materials, making final revisions at the end of the pilot RCT. If successful, this project will provide us with materials, experience, and pilot data needed for the next stage of this line of research, namely, a fully powered RCT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Weekly hatha yoga classes lasting 10 weeks.
Weekly health education classes lasting 10 weeks.
Time frame: Assessed at the end of the program (hatha yoga or health education) at week 10
Program Satisfaction as measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) total score. The CSQ-8 is an 8-item measure with each item measured on a 1-4 scale. Items are summed, with a total score range from 8-32. Higher scores indicate greater client satisfaction.
Time frame: Assessed at beginning of the program at week 1
Credibility as assessed by Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), credibility subscale. The credibility subscale of the CEQ consists of 3 items from the 6 item CEQ. The 3 items are scored on a range of 0-1, and the mean of these is used in analysis. Higher scores indicate greater intervention credibility.
Time frame: Assessed at beginning of the program at week 1
Expectancy assessed with the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), expectancy subscale. The expectancy subscale is a 3 item subscale of the 6 item CEQ. The 3 items are each scored on a range of 0-1, and the mean of of this is used in analysis. Higher scores indicate greater expectations that the intervention will be beneficial.
Time frame: Assessed at each weekly class for 10 weeks
Number of participants who met class attendance target (6/10 classes total) as assessed through weekly attendance ratings.
Time frame: Change from baseline to the 10 week follow-up
Anger severity was assessed using the Novaco Anger Scale (NAS) from the Novaco Anger Scale and Provocation Inventory (NAS-PI). The NAS is a 48 item measure with each item rated from 1-3. Items are summed, with scores that range from 48-144. Higher scores are indicative of greater experiences of anger. For this study, we report average change in scores from the baseline to the 10 week-follow-up, upon completion of the study intervention. Hence, a positive (vs. negative) change score reflects a reduction in anger from baseline to 10 week follow-up. Higher change scores reflect larger reductions in anger severity.
Brown University
Other
Acronym: POMB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04654260
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02882802
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
West Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04997356
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01965184
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details