Northwestern Univeristy Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
NCT Number: NCT03419585
Fatigue due to cancer and its treatment (for example, radiation therapy) can interfere with quality of life and can linger long after treatment has ended, yet research examining preventative approaches has produced limited clinical benefit. The proposed study will provide information about systematic light exposure for the prevention of fatigue in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy and will investigate how it works. This study would facilitate the development of this potential preventative treatment, giving health care providers and cancer survivors a much-needed tool to help with cancer-related fatigue.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
30 minutes of intervention systematic light exposure daily
30 minutes of comparison systematic light exposure daily
Time frame: Baseline
FACIT-Fatigue scores
Time frame: Change from Baseline to the 4th week of the intervention
FACIT-Fatigue scores
Time frame: Change from Baseline to the 8th week of the intervention
FACIT-Fatigue scores
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 2 months after the intervention
FACIT-Fatigue scores
Time frame: Baseline
Actigraphy
Time frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Actigraphy
Time frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Actigraphy
Time frame: 2 months after the intervention
Actigraphy
Time frame: Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: 2 months after the intervention
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: Baseline
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Score range is 0 to 60, where higher scores represent more symptomatology present.
Time frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Score range is 0 to 60, where higher scores represent more symptomatology present.
Time frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Score range is 0 to 60, where higher scores represent more symptomatology present.
Time frame: 2 months after the intervention
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Score range is 0 to 60, where higher scores represent more symptomatology present.
Time frame: Baseline
Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)
Time frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)
Time frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)
Time frame: 2 months after the intervention
Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)
Time frame: Baseline
3 items from the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire & 3 items from American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index
Time frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
3 items from the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire & 3 items from American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index
Time frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
3 items from the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire & 3 items from American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index
Time frame: 2 months after the intervention
3 items from the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire & 3 items from American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index
Time frame: Baseline
Neuropsychological tests
Time frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Neuropsychological tests
Time frame: 2 months after the intervention
Neuropsychological tests
Time frame: Baseline
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). From Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: "The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being."with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being.
Time frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). From Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: "The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being."
Time frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). From Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: "The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being."with prostate cancer patients (1, 2, 3). It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being.
Time frame: 2 months after the intervention
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). From Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: "The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being."with prostate cancer patients (1, 2, 3). It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being.
Time frame: Baseline
Credibility/Expectancy questionnaire. There are two scales used during the questionnaire - (1-9, and 0-100%). A composite score can be calculated for each factor (expectancy and credibility).
Time frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction - General (FACT-TS-G)
Time frame: Throughout intervention period (8 weeks)
integrated meter measurement and Litebook log. Length of time light box has been used.
Time frame: Baseline
Morningness-eveningness questionnaire. From the item itself: "Scores can range from 4-25. Scores of 7 and below indicate "evening types." Scores of 22 and above indicate "morning types." Scores between 8-21 indicate "intermediate types."
Time frame: Baseline
BMI table
Time frame: Baseline
Goldin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire. From the measure itself: " For the first question, weekly frequencies of strenuous, moderate, and light activities are multiplied by nine, five, and three, respectively. Total weekly leisure activity is calculated in arbitrary units by summing the products of the separate components, as shown in the following formula: Weekly leisure activity score = (9 × Strenuous) + (5 × Moderate) + (3 × Light) The second question is used to calculate the frequency of weekly leisure-time activities pursued "long enough to work up a sweat" (see questionnaire)."
Northwestern University
Other
Systematic Light Exposure to Prevent Fatigue in Prostate Cancer Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00037024
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02321358
Behavior, Breast Cancer
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04827446
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05582759
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
View Trial Details