Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT01496638

The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

How should coronary artery stenoses with significant side branch be stented?

A strategy of stenting both main vessel and side branch compared to a strategy of stenting the main vessel and only stenting the side branch if necessary.

The 2-stent strategy is superior to the 1-stent strategy regarding occurrence of cardiac death, non-procedure related myocardial infarction and re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Aarhus University Hospital

Skejby, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark

About this study

Design:

  • Randomised open multicentre trial.

Patients:

  • Number 450.

Randomisation:

  • No side branch treatment group or stenting of main vessel and side branch group.

Evaluation of endpoints:

  • Primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed by an independent endpoint committee.
  • The endpoint committee will consist of experienced cardiologists with professor Kristian Thygesen, Aarhus Universitetshospital, as chairman.

Sample size calculation:

  • A total of 225 patients will be included in each group, in total 450 patients. We expect a primary endpoint rate of 10% (cardiac death, non-procedure related myocardial infarction related to index lesion or TLR after 6 months) in the 1- stent strategy group and of 3% in the 2-stent strategy group. With an alpha of 5% and a strength of 80%, 194 patients will be needed in each group (two-sided chi-square test) to demonstrate this difference. The expected primary endpoint rate after 6 months is based on 6 months MACE rates and on the angiographic results in our previously published studies. In these studies, a 6 months MACE rate of 3.7% was found in the culotte group of the Nordic Stent Technique Study. Besides, an angiographic restenosis rate of 19.2% in the 1-stent strategy group in the Nordic Bifurcation Study is estimated to translate to a MACE rate of approximately 10% in the present study.

Analysis of the population:

  • The results will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Data management:

  • The study is reported to Datatilsynet (The Danish Data Protection Agency) and the agency's guidelines for data management will be followed.

Dedicated case record forms (CRF) will be used and faxed to PCI research, Cardiac Cath. Lab., Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. Data will be stored in an Access database and double data entry will be used as quality control. There will be a log of accesses and attempt of accesses. Back-up data and original data will be cryptotized.

Monitoring of the study:

  • The study will be monitored according to the GCP rules by independent professionals. During the study period, monitors will have regular contact to the participating departments to ensure that the trial is conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and applicable regulatory requirements

Publication:

  • Results, positive as well as negative, will be published in an international cardiovascular journal. Publication and author issues will be decided by the steering committee on basis of general involvement in the study (drafting of protocol, core lab. function, end point committee membership, etc.) and of number of included patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Stable or unstable angina pectoris or silent angina pectoris.
  • Genuine bifurcation lesion ( Medina type 1,1,1 or 1,0,1 or 0,1,1)
  • Lesion of "LAD/diagonal", "Cx/obtuse marginal", "RCA-PDA/posterolateral branch" or "LM/Cx/LAD".
  • Diameter of main vessel by visual estimate >3.0 mm.
  • Diameter of side branch by visual estimate >2.75 mm.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours.
  • Side branch lesion length >15 mm.
  • Expected survival < 1 year.
  • S-creatinine >200 µmol/l.
  • Allergy to Aspirin, Clopidogrel or Ticlopidine.
  • Allergy to Sirolimus.

Treatment and study plan

Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion

Procedure

Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion with no side branch treatment

Other names: PCI, PTCA

Primary outcomes

  1. Combined endpoint of: Cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation

    Time frame: After 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. MACE (cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revasculation)

    Time frame: During admission, after 1, 24, 36 and 60 months.

  2. Cardiac death.

    Time frame: During the admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.

  3. Non-index procedure related myocardial infarction during the admission.

    Time frame: After 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.

  4. Stent thrombosis.

    Time frame: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.

  5. Total mortality

    Time frame: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months and 10 years.

  6. target lesion revascularisation.

    Time frame: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.

  7. target vessel revascularisation.

    Time frame: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.

  8. Index procedure related myocardial infarction based on biomarkers (CK-MB mass, TNT/TNI

    Time frame: During hospital period, 1, 8, 24, 36 and 60 months

  9. CCS angina class

    Time frame: After 6, 8, 24, 36 and 60 months.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Evald Hoej Christiansen

Other

Collaborators

  • Johnson & Johnson

Registry information

Official study title

How Should Coronary Artery Stenoses With Significant Side Branch be Stented? A Strategy of Stenting Both Main Vessel and Side Branch Compared to a Strategy of Stenting the Main Vessel and Only Stenting the Side Branch if Necessary.

Acronym: BIF IV

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 21, 2011
Registry last updated
Jan 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.