MenoufiaU
Menoufia, Shebin El-kom, 32511, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04557722
To analyze and compare the puncture success rate, puncture fluoroscopy time and intraoperative puncture complications of two different puncture techniques; fluoroscopic bi-planar (0-30º) versus newly reported bi-planar (0-90º) technique in PCNL.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Menoufia, Shebin El-kom, 32511, Egypt
Nephrolithiasis is one of the most common urological diseases, it is a widespread and challenging issue for both patients and healthcare systems. It is responsible for a significant financial and psychological burden, with an increased incidence of disease. The EAU (European Association of Urology) Guidelines recommend percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with kidney stones >2 cm.
The most crucial step of the procedure is the precise puncture of the caliceal system. This can be accomplished by the use of fluoroscopy, ultrasound, or the combination of both and new other imaging modalities techniques. Among them, Fluoroscopy is the most common method for conducting the percutaneous puncture by urologists worldwide using multiple mono-planar or bi-planar fluoroscopic techniques.
However, all fluoroscopic approaches face the same limitation, which is the difficult interpretation of the three-dimensional renal anatomy based on the two-dimensional X-ray information. Another disadvantage is the amount of fluoroscopic radiation used. Surgeons, assistants, nurses and patients, however, all have to accept various levels of radiation exposure. Numerous researches have revealed that it is still harmful to the human body who is exposed to radiation frequently, although under the aegis of protective aprons and thyroid shields, thus the application is affected to varying degrees.
Fluoroscopic bi-planar techniques provide better information about the depth and direction of the collecting system than mono-planar methods. The most popular bi-planar methods described in the literature are the triangulation (0-30º), the "bull´s eye" technique and the less known bi-planar technique (The 0-90º technique) described by Dr. Paul Escovar. A newly published (0-90º) technique by Braulio O Manzo et al to increase the accuracy of calculating the needle path to the exact calyx depth and decreases its radiation exposure.
In the current study, the investigator aimed to compare two different renal access techniques; fluoroscopic 0-30 and modified 0-90 technique regarding success rate, fluoroscopy time and intraoperative puncture complications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
after retrograde instillation of contrast through the ureteric catheter; the puncture of the desired calyx by using the 0-30 degree technique of C-Arm.
after retrograde instillation of contrast through the ureteric catheter; the puncture of the desired calyx by using the 0-90 degree technique of C-Arm.
Time frame: intraoperative
percentage of patients in whom the renal puncture achieving desired calyx (evaluated by adequate introduction of the guidewire, bright urine output and stone accessibility).
Time frame: intraoperative
assessed on the monitor of C-Arm.
Time frame: intraoperative
Menoufia University
Other
The Newly Reported (0-90°) Versus (0-30°) Biplanar Fluoroscopic Puncture Technique for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Prospective Randomized Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06837883
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
Qina, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06415253
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous, Pathologic Processes
Sanliurfa, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03652103
Agnosia, Anesthesia and Analgesia
Karabağlar, İzmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05024344
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details