Derince Training and Research Hospital
Kocaeli, Derince, 41900, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT04102358
Theoretically, all surgeries below mid-humerus can be done under infraclavicular (IC) blocks. Following the introduction of ultrasonography (USG) to clinical anesthesia, plexus, and nerve blocks under the guidance of USG have gained wide acceptance for the high rates of block success and low risk of complications (1). In this study, the main aim is to evaluate the single injection and triple injection techniques in IC blocks with a USG-guided medial approach in terms of block success and the need for supplementary blocks. The secondary goals are to compare the complication rates and sensory block durations and to discuss the possible reasons for the failure of the blocks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me14 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Kocaeli, Derince, 41900, Turkey (Türkiye)
Theoretically all surgeries below mid-humerus can be done under infraclavicular (IC) blocks. Following the introduction of ultrasonography (USG) to the clinical anesthesia, plexus and nerve blocks under the guidance of USG have gained wide acceptance for the high rates of block success, and low risk of complications. At the same time, it was also shown that USG-guided IC blocks can shorten procedural times and accelerate the onset of the blocks.
Several methods for IC blocks have been described. Based on the anatomical knowledge, we hypothesized that in medial approaches the need for supplementary blocks would be low with single injections as well as triple injections. In this study, the main aim is to evaluate the single injection and triple injection techniques in IC blocks with a USG-guided medial approach in terms of block success and the need for supplementary blocks. The secondary goals are to compare the complication rates and sensory block durations and to discuss the possible reasons for the failure of the blocks.
Medical records of 139 patients scheduled for elective or emergent hand, wrist, forearm, elbow, and distal arm surgery were analyzed. Patients older than 14 years with ASA physical status I-III who underwent surgery between October 2017 and March 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Exclusion criteria included non-cooperative patients, refusal of the regional anesthesia, known neuropathy that could prevent the evaluation of the efficacy of the block, different techniques used for infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (lateral sagittal, coracoid, …etc.), and known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
infraclavicular blocks performed with single injection
infraclavicular blocks performed with triple injection
Time frame: 1 hour
30 minutes after the block, if one or two of the median, radial, ulnar or musculocutaneous nerves were still unblocked, these nerves were located either with a peripheric nerve stimulator or an ultrasound, in the axilla or on the more distal parts of their traces on arm and forearm and then supplemented.
Time frame: 30 minutes
If more than two of these nerves (median, radial, ulnar or musculocutaneous) were remained unblocked, no supplementary blocks were applied, then it was considered as having a failed block and general anesthesia was administered.
Time frame: 24 hours
the first time of the need for analgesics
Time frame: 1 hour
paresthesia during the infraclavicular block
Time frame: 1 hour
inadvertent vascular puncture during the infraclavicular block
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Other
The Need for Supplemental Blocks in Single Versus Triple Injections in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks With Medial Approach: A Clinical and an Anatomical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05100706
Acute Pain, Anesthesia, Regional
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07018258
Agnosia, Anesthesia, Regional
Sanliurfa, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03449680
Anesthesia, Regional
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06203743
Anesthesia, Caudal, Anesthesia, Regional
Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details