Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04408430

The MITRAL II Pivotal Trial (Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLves).

A prospective multicenter study enrolling high surgical risk patients with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) and symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction (severe stenosis, ≥ moderate to severe regurgitation, or mixed ≥ moderate stenosis and ≥ regurgitation). There are 2 Arms in this study: 1) "Transseptal (TS) Valve-in-MAC" (ViMAC) Arm, and 2) Natural History of Disease Registry (NHDR) for patients treated with medical treatment only (which includes patients who meet inclusion criteria but can't be treated with transeptal ViMAC due to the presence of anatomical exclusion criteria or other exclusion criteria) and have not had other procedures that may impact outcomes (i.e., alcohol septal ablation or radiofrequency ablation). The study also includes a Registry of Permanently Unassigned" for subjects who undergo preemptive septal ablation procedures (alcohol or radiofrequency) in anticipation of continuing onto ViMAC arm, but are not accepted in the ViMAC Study arm or the patient chooses not to undergo ViMAC procedure.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ignacio Chávez National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico

Loading trial locations.

About this study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN 3, SAPIEN 3 Ultra and SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA (SAPIEN 3/Ultra/RESILIA) valves with Commander delivery system in patients with severe mitral annular calcification and symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction who are not candidates for standard mitral valve surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective multicenter study enrolling high surgical risk patients with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) and symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction (severe stenosis, ≥ moderate to severe regurgitation, or mixed ≥ moderate stenosis and ≥ regurgitation). There are 2 arms in this study: 1) "Transseptal (TS) Valve-in-MAC (ViMAC)" arm, 2) Natural History of Disease Registry (NHDR). Patients treated with medical treatment only (which will include patients who meet inclusion criteria but can't be treated with transseptal ViMAC due to the presence of anatomical exclusion criteria or other exclusion criteria) and have not had other procedures that may impact outcomes (i.e. alcohol septal ablation, radiofrequency ablation).

Enrollment Enrollment will consist of 110 patients in the treatment arm (transseptal ViMAC) and up to 100 in the medically treated arm).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

All Candidates must meet the following criteria:

  • - 18 years of age or older
  • -Severe mitral annular calcification with symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction including severe mitral stenosis defined as mitral valve area (MVA) of ≤1.5 cm2, or ≥ moderate to severe mitral regurgitation, or mixed ≥ moderated stenosis and ≥ moderate regurgitation. For this study, the severity of mitral regurgitation will be graded according to the 2017 American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines: None, Trivial, Mild 1(+), Moderate 2(+), Moderate to severe 3(+), and severe 4(+).
  • - NYHA Functional Class ≥II.
  • The heart team agrees that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
  • High or prohibitive risk for standard mitral valve surgery as determined by the heart team (at least one site cardiac surgeon must personally examine the subject to determine operative risk in patients presented for inclusion to ViMAC arm). NOTE: Patients not interested in mitral intervention or who are being considered for inclusion in the Natural History of Disease Registry are not required to be evaluated in person by a surgeon.)
  • The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
  • The study patient agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits including annual visits through 5 years.

Exclusion criteria

for ViMAC subjects (does not apply to the Natural History of Disease Registry):

  • - The heart team considers the patient is a surgical candidate.
  • - Mitral annulus is not severely calcified.
  • - Myocardial infarction requiring revascularization within 30 days from procedure.
  • - Clinically significant untreated coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
  • Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease). Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is not exclusionary.
  • Any patient with a balloon valvuloplasty (BMV) within 30 days of the procedure (unless BMV is a bridge to ViMAC procedure after a qualifying Echo).
  • Severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (hepatic dysfunction, ascites, edema not controlled with diuretics) requiring surgery.
  • Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Platelets < 50,000 cell/mL), history of coagulopathy or hypercoagulable state.
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) with mean LVOT gradient of ≥20 mm Hg at rest or ≥50 mmHg with Valsalva.
  • Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation.
  • Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  • Severe left ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 20%.
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  • Active upper GI bleeding within 90 days prior to procedure.
  • A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure.
  • Cardiac anatomy that would preclude appropriate delivery and deployment of an Edwards SAPIEN 3/Ultra/RESILIA valve in MAC via transseptal access, including but not limited to:
  • Native neo mitral annulus size < 275 mm2 or > 810 mm2 as measured by CT scan.
  • Significant risk of LVOT obstruction or valve embolization as assessed by CT core lab
  • Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days of the procedure.
  • Estimated life expectancy <12 months due to non-cardiac conditions.
  • Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of mitral valve dysfunction.
  • Active bacterial endocarditis within 180 days of procedure.
  • - Severe right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by Echo core lab
  • - Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (subject may be a candidate after 2 weeks of antibiotic discontinuation.
  • - Female who is pregnant or lactating.
  • - Participating in another investigational device study.
  • - Aortic valve disease requiring intervention. If aortic valve intervention is required, the AVR procedure should be performed first and if the patient remains symptomatic after AVR, may be presented for consideration for inclusion in this trial.
  • - Severe fixed pulmonary hypertension (PASP ≥70 mmHg and more than 2/3 of the systemic systolic blood pressure).
  • - Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring continuous home oxygen.
  • - The patient refuses mitral valve intervention
  • - Recent symptomatic COVID-19 infection with residual symptoms that may affect the outcomes of this trial.

Treatment and study plan

Transseptal ViMAC

Device

Transseptal TMVR using balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter valves.

Other names: ViMAC

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Endpoint: All Cause Morality and Hospitalization for Heart Failure

    Time frame: 1 year.

    A non-hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Time frame: 1 year

    • Stroke at 30 days and 1 year.
  2. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Time frame: 1 year.

    • Change from baseline in New York Heart Association Class at 1 year.
  3. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Time frame: 1 year.

    • Change from baseline in distance walked measure by the 6 Minute Walk Test at 1 year.
  4. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Time frame: 1 year.

    • Change from baseline in quality-of-life measure by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 1 year.
  5. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Time frame: 1 year.

    • Echocardiographic assessment of degree of mitral regurgitation (central and paravalvular) at 1 year.
  6. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Time frame: 1 year.

    • Significant mitral stenosis defined as mean mitral valve gradient by echo > 10 mmHg at 1 year.

Other outcomes

  1. Additional Endpoint: Technical Success

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention procedure.

    • Technical success at exit from the cath lab.

    Defined as:

    • Successful vascular access, delivery and retrieval of the transcatheter valve delivery system.
    • Deployment of a single valve.
    • Correct position of transcatheter valve in the mitral annulus.
    • Adequate performance of the prosthetic heart valve (MVA > 1.5 cm2) without residual mitral regurgitation grade ≥2 (+).
    • No need for additional surgery or re-intervention (includes drainage of pericardial effusion).
    • The patient leaves the cath lab alive.
  2. Additional Endpoint: Procedural Success

    Time frame: 30 days

    • Procedural Success at 30 days.

    Defined as:

    • Device success at 30 days.
    • No device/procedure related SAE's including: death, stroke, MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG, stage 2 or 3 AKI including dialysis, life threatening bleeding, major vascular or access complications (arterial, venous, or TA - any event requiring additional unplanned surgical or transcatheter intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous pressors or invasive or mechanical treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices including intra-aortic balloon pump or left ventricular assist device, or prolonged intubation for ≥48 hrs, or any valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention.
  3. Additional Endpoint: Device Success

    Time frame: 30 days.

    Device success is defined as:

    • Stroke free survival with original valve in place.
    • No need for additional surgery or re-intervention related to the procedure, access or to the replacement valve.
    • Proper placement and intended function of the replacement valve, including
    • No migration, fracture, thrombosis, hemolysis or endocarditis.
    • No replacement valve stenosis (MV gradient < 10 mmHg).
    • Replacement valve regurgitation < 2 + (including central and paravalvular leak) and without associated hemolysis.
    • No increase in AI from baseline (more than 1 grade) and LVOT gradient < 20 mmHg increase from baseline.
  4. Additional Efficacy Endpoint - NYHA Class at 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days.

    • Change from baseline in NYHA Class at 30 days.
  5. Additional Efficacy Endpoint - Distance walked in 6 MWT at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days.

    • Change from baseline in distance walked measure by the 6 MWT at 30 days.
  6. Additional Efficacy Endpoint - KCCQ at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days.

    • Change from baseline in KCCQ at 30 days.
  7. Additional Efficacy Endpoint - MR severity at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    • Degree of mitral regurgitation (central and paravalvular) at 30 days.
  8. Additional Safety Endpoint - Stroke at 30 days and 1 year.

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • Stroke at 30 days and 1 year.
  9. Additional Safety Endpoint - Need for ASD Closure

    Time frame: 30 days.

    • Iatrogenic ASD causing RV failure or hypoxemia or need for ASD closure at discharge and 30 days.
  10. Additional Safety Endpoint - New LVOT Gradient

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • New mean LVOT gradient ≥ 20 mmHg, or ≥ 20 mmHg increase from baseline LVOT gradient at 30 days and 1 year.
  11. Additional Efficacy Endpoint - Mitral Valve Reintervention

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • Mitral Valve reintervention at 30 days and 1 year.
  12. Additional Safety Endpoint - Hospitalizations at 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year.

    • Number of hospitalizations at 1 year.
  13. Additional Efficacy Endpoint - Days Alive Out of the Hospital

    Time frame: 1 year.

    • Days alive out of hospital at 1 year from index procedure (ViMAC arm) or from assignment day (Natural History Registry).
  14. Additional Safety Endpoint - Hemolysis

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • Hemolysis at 30 days and 1 year.
  15. Additional Safety Endpoint - Endocarditis

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • Endocarditis at 30 days and 1 year.
  16. Additional Safety Endpoint - Blood Transfusion

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • Blood transfusion at 30 days and 1 year.
  17. Additional Safety Endpoint - New Pacemaker Requirement

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • New pacemaker requirement at 30 days and 1 year.
  18. Additional Safety Endpoint - New Aortic Valve Insufficiency

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • New aortic valve insufficiency at 30 days and 1 year.
  19. Additional Safety Endpoint - Acute Kidney Injury

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year.

    • Acute kidney injury (MVARC) at 30 days and 1 year.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Tatiana Kaptzan, Ph. D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

507-284-1610

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayra Guerrero

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Safety and Effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN 3, SAPIEN 3 Ultra, and SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA (SAPIEN 3/Ultra/RESILIA) Valve in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Calcific Mitral Valve Disease With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification Who Are Not Candidates for Standard Mitral Valve Surgery.

Acronym: MITRAL-II

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2030
First posted
May 29, 2020
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.