Participants will:
- Visit the study site at baseline and month 6 to complete assessments.
- Complete online assessments at months 1, 3, 9 and 12.
- Be assigned to group 1 (intervention) or group 2 (comparison).
- Participants in group 1 will download the LvL UP App.
- Participants in group 1 categorized as non-responders; at month 1 will start receiving six motivational interviewing coaching sessions in addition to continue using the LvL UP app (LvL UP + MI).
- Participants in group 2 will receive a package with standard lifestyle resources from Singapore Health Promotion Board.
Participants will be randomly allocated to groups 1 or 2 (LvL UP or comparison) following a 2:1 ratio favoring the LvL UP group. At month 1 (decision point), participants from the LvL UP group will be classified as responders or non-responders based on pre-specified criteria. Non-responder participants will be re-randomized with equal probability (1:1) to one of the two second-line conditions: (i) continuing with the initial intervention (LvL UP) or (ii) additional MI support sessions (LvL UP + MI). The LvL UP pilot study results (NCT06360029) will be used to inform the tailoring variable(s) for the trial (i.e., to define response / non-response at month 1). Engagement and app evaluation variables (e.g., number of app components completed over the first 4 weeks, net promoter score), preliminary intervention effects (e.g., initial positive response), or a combination of the two will be used.
Participants will also take part in a process evaluation informed by the UK Medical Research Council guidelines to explore implementation (process, fidelity, dose, adaptations, reach), mechanisms of action (participant experience and response to intervention, mediators, unexpected pathways and consequences), and contextual factors that may affect implementation and intervention outcomes. Methods will entail qualitative and quantitative approaches, including surveys, interviews, web-based and app-based analytic data, and direct observation. In addition, other measures have been added to the research protocol to address the following exploratory aims (all relevant measures are described in the outcomes section):
A. To identify the most cost-effective intervention condition from the societal perspective (e.g., self-reported sickness absence).
B. To explore time-varying and baseline moderators on intervention outcomes (e.g., sociodemographic variables, personality).
C. To investigate behavior maintenance by assessing the intervention outcomes at six months of follow-up (i.e., 12 months after baseline).
D. To investigate which smartphone sensor data might be effective in predicting user state of receptivity to LvL UP notifications (receptivity: the likelihood of engaging with a LvL UP notification, operationalized as higher response rate and decreased response time).
E. To investigate which signals (e.g., audio signals, usage patterns) are most useful for predicting the presence of subclinical depression, anxiety, stress and/or other mental health conditions.
F. To validate a 7-day modified Food Frequency Questionnaire based on My Healthy Plate recommendations by Singapore Health Promotion Board (HPB).
G. To develop and evaluate a supervised non-responder / dropout prediction model using retrospective user app engagement data from the trial.
H. To explore views on climate and climate change and assess their perceived impact (including impact on health behaviours).
The study was powered to compare the baseline to 6 months change in mental well-being between LvL UP (A+B) and the comparison condition and between LvL UP + adaptive MI (A+C) versus the comparison condition (primary objective). For both comparisons, we assume the effect size (Cohen's d) for well-being to be 0.3 and the responder rate to stage 1 intervention (LvL UP) to be 50%. The effect size was estimated by aggregating data from five meta-analyses on mHealth interventions and their reported impact on participant's mental well-being. To obtain a marginal power of at least 80% with a two-tailed Type I error rate of 5% for each outcome, 458 participants will be required; we further buffer for 73% retention following a recent meta-analysis estimate for digital health interventions lasting more than 8 weeks, rounding the number for a final sample size of 650. Therefore, 217 participants will be randomized to the comparison condition, and 433 participants will be randomized to start with stage 1 intervention (LvL UP), of which we estimate about 217 participants (50% non-responders) will be re-randomized to either continue with LvL UP or receive MI at stage 2 (LvL UP + adaptive MI). Participants randomized to group 1 (LvL UP) are asked to nominate a LvL UP Buddy, which will take part in the process evaluation. The total sample size is thus 1,073 (650 as main participants and 423 as LvL UP Buddies). The above sample size calculations might be refined based on the LvL UP pilot study results.
