Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06817122

The "Let's Talk Tech" Tool to Support Decision Making About Technology Use

The goal of this research is to educate people about different technologies to support care at home when someone is experiencing memory difficulties. "Let's Talk Tech" is a new tool to educate people about technologies commonly used to support care and monitor safety, and help families talk about their feelings about them to understand each other's perspectives. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if "Let's Talk Tech" helps people feel more prepared to make decisions about technologies.

Researchers will compare Let's Talk Tech to usual care (no intervention) to see if Let's Talk Tech increases peoples' preparedness and confidence to make decisions about technologies.

Participants will:

* Use the Let's Talk Tech web application together with their study partner that takes up to an hour or do nothing. * Complete three surveys. The second survey will be taken within 2 weeks of the first and the last survey will be taken 3 months after the first.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

The goal of this research is to help families understand digital health technology options to support dementia care at home so they can negotiate immediate decisions and future use in an informed way. This is a mechanism-focused trial of Let's Talk Tech (LTT), a single-use, self-administered intervention in the form of a web application. It targets education and interpersonal communication processes to enable informed decision making and planning for technology use that relieves care partners of the burden of making decisions without awareness of the person's preferences. Participants are people living with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (PLWD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a care partner. The 120 enrolled dyads (60 per study group) will be randomly assigned to receive either the intervention or usual care control. The intervention is self-administered. All participants will complete measures at baseline, at post-test (2 weeks) and 3 months later. Aim 1 will test if LTT compared with usual care improves the hypothesized mechanisms of change that are care partners' technology awareness, understanding, communication satisfaction, and intention to honor the PLWD/MCI's preferences, as well as both care partner- and PLWD/MCI-reported dyadic alignment. Aim 2 will examine if and how those hypothesized mechanisms of change improve the post-test and 3-month primary outcomes of care partner preparedness and decisional conflict, and secondary outcomes of PLWD/MCI and care partner sharing of technology preferences beyond the dyad and their confidence that PLWD/MCI's preferences will be honored. Exploratory Aim 3 will examine how, with whom, and for what purpose dyad members share technology preferences and explore factors that vary for those who shared with providers vs. family/friends, with the hope of learning how to expand the reach of this intervention to activate dyads' entire care networks.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

for Patients:

  • have mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia
  • age 55 or older
  • able to understand and speak English

Inclusion criteria

for Co-participants:

  • be identified by the patient as their primary support person
  • age 18 or older
  • able to understand and speak English
  • able to complete LTT together with their study partner at the same time

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

Let's Talk Tech

Behavioral

Let's Talk Tech is a self-administered dyadic education and communication tool delivered as a web application to support shared decision making about technology use.

Primary outcomes

  1. Preparedness to make technology decisions

    Time frame: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

    Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Strongly agree" to 5="Strongly disagree"] how much they agree with the statement that they feel prepared to make decisions about technology use for their study partner.

  2. Decisional Conflict Scale

    Time frame: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

    The Decisional Conflict Scale is a 16-item scale with 5 response categories [0= "Strongly agree" to 4="Strongly disagree"]. Higher scores reflect higher decisional conflict in decision making.

  3. Technology awareness

    Time frame: baseline and 2-week post-test

    Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Very aware" to 5="Very unaware"] how aware they are about technologies available to support their partner's care and safety.

  4. Technology understanding

    Time frame: baseline and 2-week post-test

    4 items assess perceived understanding of each of 4 technologies featured in the intervention [1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"].

  5. Perception of PLWD/MCI's technology understanding

    Time frame: baseline and 2-week post-test

    4 items assess care partner's perception of how well their study partner understands of each of 4 technologies featured in the intervention [1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"].

  6. Satisfaction with dyadic communication about technology

    Time frame: baseline and 2-week post-test

    Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Very satisfied" to 5="Very dissatisfied"] how satisfied they are with their discussion with their study partner about using technology to support their care or safety.

  7. Intention to honor preferences

    Time frame: baseline and 2-week post-test

    Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1="Very likely" to 5="Very unlikely"] how likely they are to honor their partner's preferences for how technology is used in their care.

  8. Dyadic alignment about technology use

    Time frame: baseline and 2-week post-test

    Participant is asked how much they agree with their partner about using technologies to support their care [1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"].

Secondary outcomes

  1. Shared technology preferences

    Time frame: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

    Participant answer yes or no if they have ever shared the PLWD/MCI's preferences about technologies to support their care with anyone else.

  2. Confidence preferences will be honored

    Time frame: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months

    Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale [1=Strongly agree to 5=Strongly disagree] about their belief the PLWD/MCI's choices about these technologies will be honored.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Clara Berridge, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

917-480-6050

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Washington

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Registry information

Official study title

Mechanistic Study of the "Let's Talk Tech" Dyadic Behavioral Intervention to Support Decision Making About Technology Use

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 10, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.