Leadless Pacemaker
DevicePatients will undergo an attempted leadless pacemaker implant
NCT Number: NCT02030418
Prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, international multicenter, clinical safety and effectiveness of a leadless pacemaker system in patients who are indicated for a VVIR pacemaker.
Following completion of enrollments in the IDE, patients will continue to be enrolled in the continued access phase of the study under the same protocol.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the leadless pacemaker system in treating patients with a slow heart rate or irregular heartbeats. The Nanostim leadless pacemaker provides bradycardia pacing as a pulse generator with built-in battery and electrodes, for permanent implantation in the right ventricle. As a leadless pacemaker, it does not need a connector, pacing lead, or pulse generator pocket, but it has the same operating principles as a conventional pacemaker.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will undergo an attempted leadless pacemaker implant
Time frame: 6 months
Complication is any device-or-procedure related serious adverse event, or serious adverse device effect, including those that prevented initial implantation. Percentage of participants free from complications are reported
Time frame: 6 months
Success Rate is percentage of subjects who have acceptable pacing threshold and sensing amplitudes, which are defined as pacing threshold <=2.0V at 0.4 ms pulse width and R-wave amplitude either =>5.0 mV at the 6 month visit or => value at implant.
Time frame: 3-6 months
Temperature-based rate response feature was evaluated to determine whether an appropriate and proportional rate response was achieved during maximal effort graded treadmill exercise testing protocol (CAEP). All capable subjects who have completed the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were asked to perform a maximal effort CAEP exercise protocol to demonstrate an appropriate and proportional response of sensor-indicated rate in graded exercise tests.
Data from subjects who have completed the 6MWT and have completed at least stage 3 of the CAEP exercise protocol, or 3.6 metabolic equivalent of task (METs), were included in the analysis.
Abbott Medical Devices
Industry
The LEADLESS II IDE Study (Phase I): Safety and Effectiveness Trial for the Nanostim Leadless Pacemaker
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06540079
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05345925
A-V Block, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Krakow, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT04463121
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bradycardia
Prague, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT02083952
Apnea, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details