Biktarvy
DrugIntegrase inhibitor used to treat HIV-1 infection
NCT Number: NCT03696160
The main purpose of this study is to compare two different types of HIV treatments, in terms of effectiveness and improvement of side effects, for patients who are diagnosed with a more advanced HIV infection. Patients with advanced HIV infections are otherwise known as 'late presenters'.
There are many effective treatments for HIV available; however, for late presenting patients the investigators do not know which type of treatment performs best. This is the first large study to compare treatments for patients in this situation, and the investigators hope that the results of this study will help doctors decide which treatments to use in the future.
The two different types of treatment the investigators are comparing both contain a mixture of drugs that work together to combat HIV:
The Boosted Protease Inhibitor combination (PI) which is a combination tablet containing: darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. It was approved for use in Europe under the brand name Symtuza®.
The Integrase Inhibitor combination (INI). Which is a combination tablet containing: bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. This is a a newer combination which was approved for use in Europe in June 2018 under the brand name of Biktarvy®.
The main difference between the two treatments is how each one fights a HIV infection. They both stop a part of the virus from working (i.e. inhibit it), to prevent it from making copies of itself. The PI treatment contains drugs to stop the protease part of the virus, whereas the INI treatment contains drugs to stop the integrase part.
In recent studies, it appears that treatments containing integrase inhibitors may be better for late presenting patients. They have been shown to quickly bring down the amount of virus in the body, and the side effects may be more acceptable to late presenters.
To compare the two treatments, half of the participants on this study will be given the PI treatment, and the other half will be given the INI treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
The effectiveness of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) has consistently improved over the years. This is largely due to newer drugs having improved antiviral effectiveness and more tolerable side effect profiles; resulting in better viral suppression and improved treatment adherence. On the other hand, most recent clinical trials look at the effectiveness of ART in patients with less advanced disease. These patients usually suffer from less related diseases, drug-drug interactions, and other risks for treatment failure. Outside of these trials, the number of patients who present to clinic with a more developed advanced HIV infection, known as 'late presenters', remains high across Europe. Trials for these patients have tended to focus on the time of starting treatment and the management of infections.
Much less is known about which ART treatments perform best for these late presenting patients; particularly in terms of virus suppression, immune system recovery, side effects and improvement of AIDs related diseases. No specific drug combinations have been compared in appropriate clinical trials before, and the international guidelines for first line treatment judge all therapies as equal standard of care for these patients.
The investigators anticipate that Integrase inhibitor containing regimes may be better suited to patients with advanced disease, due to their beneficial side-effect profile and ability to rapidly decrease viral load levels. Therefore the investigators are conducting this clinical trial to compare an integrase inhibitor regime, against a protease inhibitor regime in patients with advanced HIV infection. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Biktarvy® against Symtuza®.
Patients will be recruited from sites across Europe, and randomized onto either arm of the study. After randomisation onto either treatment regime, patients will attend approximately 9 follow-up visits over the course of a year. During these visits, patients will be asked to complete two questionnaires, to assess their quality of life and HIV symptoms. They will also be asked to provide a number of blood samples. These samples are to ensure that the patient is not resistant to the study drug and that their disease is not worsening. Samples to test for study drug resistance will be shipped to a laboratory for analysis in the even that the patient experiences virological failure.
Biktarvy® will be supplied from Gilead and Symtuza® will be provided by Janssen Pharmaceuticals.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Or
Or
Or
Such methods include:
Exclusion criteria
Integrase inhibitor used to treat HIV-1 infection
Protease inhibitor used to treat HIV-1 infection
Time frame: Earliest at 12 weeks, latest 48 weeks
Composite outcome: treatment failure due to either virological or clinical reasons. Virological reasons can either be insufficient virological response or viral rebound. Clinical reasons can be death related to HIV/AIDS/opportunistic infection or severe bacterial infection, new or recurrent AIDS defining event, any serious non-AIDS defining event or clinically relevant adverse events of any grade or immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome requiring treatment
Time frame: Week 24, 36 and 48
at week 24, 36, 48
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 weeks.
Time frame: 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 weeks
Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
CD4/CD8 ratio at week 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
Time frame: Week 48
Incidence of Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome
Time frame: Week 48
Start/Stop of hospitalization for any reason Start/Stop of opportunistic infections as listed within Appendix 3 (AIDS defining events according to https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5710a2.htm) Start/Stop of severe BI, which consists of any of bacterial pneumonia, invasive bacterial infection (IBI) or any bacterial infectious disorder with grade 3 severity or requiring unscheduled hospital admission. An IBI is defined as the isolation of a bacterial organism from a normally sterile body site, or for bacterial nucleic acid to be detected at a normally sterile body site. Sterile body sites include blood, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, peritoneal fluid, joint fluid, bone aspirate, or a deep tissue abscess.
Time frame: Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Antiretroviral therapy and opportunistic or bacterial infection treatment changes and dose modifications due to toxicities and drug-drug interaction with antiretroviral therapy, and Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome
Time frame: Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
EQ-5D-3L (European Quality of life - 5 Dimensions - 3 Levels) and HIV Symptoms Index questionnaires will be completed by patients throughout the study to assess any change throughout their treatment
Quality of life (EQ-5D-3L questionnaire) Scale is VAS Score which runs from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable). We report the mean change from Baseline to W48.
The HIV Symptom Index score is the sum of frequency ratings for the 20 selected symptoms; the score could range from 0 to 80 (80 being worst score). We report the mean change from Baseline to W48.
Time frame: Week 48
Discontinuation or modification of the single tablet regimen due virological reasons defined as a) Insufficient virological response, either:
a. Rebound of HIV-1 RNA to >200 copies/mL after having achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL b. Rebound of HIV RNA by >1 log 10 copies/mL from nadir value, for patients whose viral load has never been suppressed below 50 copies/mL
Time frame: Week 48
Duration of hospitalization for any reason
NEAT ID Foundation
Other
An Open-Label, Multi-Centre, Randomised Study to Investigate Integrase Inhibitor Versus Boosted Protease Inhibitor Antiretroviral Therapy for Patients With Advanced HIV Disease
Acronym: LAPTOP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05609513
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Kampala, Uganda
View Trial DetailsNCT06739915
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Actinomycetales Infections
Soweto, Gauteng, South Africa
View Trial DetailsNCT04446611
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Antenatal Care
East London, Eastern Cape, South Africa
View Trial DetailsNCT05121064
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Lusaka, Zambia
View Trial Details