Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04615377

The Kaia Hip and Knee Pain Intervention for Self-management of the Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis.

The study intervention provides an innovative way of making exercise training and other recommended lifestyle modifications as accessible as possible for knee and hip OA participants by introducing a home-based exercise training program with a motion track feedback technology. Self-management of the pain for the patients suffering osteoarthritis, in the form of lifestyle modification, implementation of coping strategies and exercise is part of recommendations of recent international guidelines such as those by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI). Cost and resource constraints typically limit the access to these recommended therapies. Moreover, the study intervention is focused on maintaining and adapting everyday physical activity, as required, in comparison to the control group.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

22 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Choo

Stamford, Connecticut, 06905, United States

About this study

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful, degenerative disease of the affected joints. According to surveys by the World Health Organization (WHO) knee and hip joint OA is one of the diseases that make up the largest proportion of all disability diseases.

On the individual patient level, there is a pronounced limitation of the quality of life, which can also lead to the development of secondary diseases. There are numerous methods available for the treatment of OA, the spectrum of which ranges from conservative measures such as physical therapy or medical procedures up to surgical procedures, especially joint replacement. In recent years, the number of prostheses implanted in knee and hip joints has increased significantly.

International guidelines such as those of the American College of Rheumatologists recommend conservative treatment of OA of the knee and hip joint with physical therapy. Multidisciplinary approaches include aerobic and anaerobic exercise training, in particular with the aim of weight loss in overweight participants, participant education for self-management of the disease and the consideration of psychosocial factors. This comprehensive, structured, conservative program for the treatment of OA achieves significantly better results than the standard treatment. However, comparable programs, which offer comprehensive management of OA are not widely available.

Digital therapies represent a novel approach to help patients manage themselves and their diseases in a home setting and even show better results than current standard therapies. An analysis of a smartphone intervention providing a multidisciplinary approach for self-management of lower back pain, the Kaia Back Pain Relief app, shows promising results in 180 users with a significant and clinically relevant reduction of pain levels.

Based on these promising results, this study will evaluate the effectiveness of the Kaia Knee and Hip pain app intervention in comparison to usual medical care in reducing pain and disease-related symptoms in participants with OA over 3 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Between 22 and 75 years old
  • Able to speak, read, and understand English
  • Able to use an iPad, has internet access at home and a personal email address
  • Self-reported diagnosis of OA of knee or hip confirmed by ACR clinical criteria
  • Self-reported pain intensity ≥4/10 on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for knee and hip pain, on average, in the week prior to screening
  • Pain duration ≥1 month
  • Willing and capable of providing Informed Consent to use the Kaia Knee and Hip pain app and participate in all assessments associated with this clinical study

Exclusion criteria

  • Referral or plans for surgery, chiropractic care, acupuncture, physical therapy, injections or other treatment for knee or hip pain in the next 3 months following screening
  • Self-reported prior subscription to Kaia apps or plans to participate in any other investigational trials or protocols for knee or hip pain
  • Prior knee or hip surgery or injury in the last 3 months
  • Current workers comp case or litigation related to musculoskeletal pain
  • Self-reported use of opioids within 30 days prior to screening
  • Self-reported history of substance abuse within the past 1 year
  • Self-reported diagnosis of an inflammatory/rheumatologic disease
  • Self-reported diagnosis of neuropathic pain disorder or other chronic pain disorder (ex. fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome [CRPS])

Treatment and study plan

Kaia hip and knee pain application

Behavioral

The Kaia Knee and Hip pain app software, when loaded onto a smartphone, recommends to the participant specific exercises for the lower extremity. Using the camera on a smartphone, the software then tracks the participant's movements as the participant performs the exercises, analyzes those movements using machine learning, and provides audio-visual feedback to the participant. The exercise therapy is augmented by educational content and cognitive behavioral therapy to provide a multidisciplinary approach to self-management of osteoarthritis. Behavioral Health Coaches ensure participant motivation throughout the program based on a predefined curriculum.

Treatment as Usual

Other

Participants allocated to the control arm will be advised to continue receiving treatment as usual ( standard care) without restrictions, except participation in other investigational trials, and will likewise be followed up for 90 days. Apart from that, they are encouraged to seek care, as they would do normally.

Primary outcomes

  1. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index as calculated from Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

    Time frame: On day 0, 30, 60 and 90

    The primary endpoint is to evaluate the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index as calculated from Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).This change will be calculated over day 0 until week 12. Where the higher scores on the HOOS and KOOS indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain index as in western Ontario and McMaster's Osteoarthritis Index as derived from Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

    Time frame: On day 0, 30, 60 and 90

    To evaluate the change from baseline by Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and derive the pain score for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain sub-scale through Week 12 i.e pain score domain (mean of changes in the 5 pain related items) on HOOS or KOOS. The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4).

  2. Functionality index as in western Ontario and McMaster's Osteoarthritis Index as derived from Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

    Time frame: On day 0, 30, 60 and 90

    To evaluate the change from baseline by Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and derive the Functionality index as for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis functionality sub-scale through Week 12 i.e pain score domain (mean of changes in the 5 pain related items) on HOOS or KOOS. The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4).

  3. Stiffness score as in western Ontario and McMaster's Osteoarthritis Index as derived from Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

    Time frame: On day 0, 30, 60 and 90

    To evaluate the change of stiffness from baseline, by Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and derive the stiffness index score as for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis stiffness sub-scale, through Week 12 i.e stiffness score domain (mean of changes in the 5 pain related items) on HOOS or KOOS. The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4).

  4. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Global 10)

    Time frame: Information collected on day 0, 30, 60 and 90

    Overall change in the Quality of life score assessed by the PROMIS Global 10 questionnaire from baseline to the week 12.

  5. Inclination towards healthcare utilization

    Time frame: Information collected only on day 0

    Self-reported inclination towards healthcare utilization on an 11-point Likert scale. Where (0) means none and (11) means Extreme.

  6. Self-reported number of lost workdays

    Time frame: Information collected only on day 0 and day 90

    Self-reported number of lost workdays in the month prior to enrolment and during study observational period (assessed at baseline day 0, day 30, day 60, and day 90)

  7. Pain medication intake

    Time frame: Information collected on day 0, 30, 60 and 90

    Pain medication intake 30 days prior to enrolment and during study period.

Other outcomes

  1. Perceived treatment helpfulness

    Time frame: Study start, On day 0

    Feedback on the mobile medical application (5-Point Likert Scales ranging from 1 "lowest satisfaction" to 5 "highest satisfaction")

  2. Satisfaction and perceived treatment helpfulness

    Time frame: Study end, On day 90

    Feedback on the mobile medical application (5-Point Likert Scales ranging from 1 "lowest satisfaction" to 5 "highest satisfaction")

  3. Self-reported healthcare utilization

    Time frame: On day 0, 30, 60 and 90

    Use of services by persons for the purpose of preventing and curing health problems (type and number of times utilized)

  4. Safety assessment

    Time frame: On day 0, 30, 60 and 90

    The safety of the usage of the Kaia Knee and Hip pain app is evaluated by the incidence of reported adverse events in the intervention and control arm.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kaia Health Software

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

The Kaia hiP and Knee paIn Digital Application as an interVention for Self-management of Pain in Patients With OsteoarThritis - a Randomised Controlled Study (Kaia PIVOT Study).

Acronym: PIVOT

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Nov 4, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 16, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.