Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06149442

The Importance of the Number of Incisions in the Effectiveness of Dry Needling

The dry needling technique is a procedure increasingly used by health professionals.

Dry needling consists of the use of a filiform needle to treat musculoskeletal pain. Currently, the mechanisms by which it is an effective technique are not well understood. One of the aspects not yet evaluated is the best dose in terms of the number of times it is necessary to insert the needle into the patient to achieve the best result.

This research work aims to assess which treatment obtains the best results in the management of patients with chronic neck pain.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centro Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

With the objective of demonstrating how the dose used during the application of the dry needling technique is related to the effectiveness of the treatment, we have designed a study where three different doses of the dry needling technique for the treatment of myofascial trigger points will be compared in the upper trapezius muscle in participants with neck pain.

Randomly, the participants will be distributed to each of the treatment groups and we will measure how the effectiveness of each of the applied doses determines the result of the application of the dry needling technique in the treatment of neck pain.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Nonspecific mechanical neck pain for more than 3 months.
  • Neck pain of at least VAS 5/10.
  • Reproduction of pain and symptoms subjects on palpation.
  • Pain on passive stretching of the muscle.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with previous surgical intervention.
  • Subjects undergoing other intervention (rehabilitation/medication).
  • Positive findings that raise suspicion of cervical radiculopathy:
  • Subjects diagnosed: degenerative arthropathies, inflammatory, systemic conditions (fibromyalgia).
  • Cardiovascular diseases.
  • Whiplash or whiplash.
  • Belenophobia.
  • Dizziness and vertigo.
  • Pregnant.
  • Thyroid disorders.

Treatment and study plan

Dose of five-incisions dry needling technique

Other

Once we have assessed the existence of a myofascial trigger point in the levator scapulae muscle, and while the subject is in lateral decubitus on the same side, with a forceps palpation, we apply a rapid in /out dry needling technique (five incisions).

Dose of ten-incisions dry needling technique

Other

Once we have assessed the existence of a myofascial trigger point in the levator scapulae muscle, and while the subject is in lateral decubitus on the same side, with a forceps palpation, we apply a rapid in /out dry needling technique (ten incisions).

Dose of fifteen-incisions dry needling technique

Other

Once we have assessed the existence of a myofascial trigger point in the levator scapulae muscle, and while the subject is in lateral decubitus on the same side, with a forceps palpation, we apply a rapid in /out dry needling technique (fifteen incisions).

Primary outcomes

  1. Neck pain

    Time frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity between patients with similar conditions. It is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disability (Neck disability index)

    Time frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.

    This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. It´s value ranges from 0 to 10 to 50 points, where 0 is the absence of disability and 50 is the highest degree of disability.

  2. Pain catastrophizing

    Time frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.

    Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The PCS is a 13-item instrumen that task participants to reflect on past painful experiences, and to indicate the degree to which they experienced each of 13 thoughts or feelings when experiencing pain, on 5-point scales with the end points (0) not at all and (4) all the time. The PCS total scores range from 0 - 52. 0 is the best result and 52 is the worst result.

  3. kinesiophobia

    Time frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.

    The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) describe patient circumstances characterised by an "excessive, irrational, and debilitating fear of physical movement and activity resulting from a feeling of vulnerability to painful injury or reinjury. The TSK is a 17 item assessment checklist.The 17 item TSK total scores range from 17 to 68 where the lowest 17 means no or negligible kinesiophobia, and the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia.

  4. The Global Rating of Change (GRoC)

    Time frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.

    It's a scale that assesses whether the patient condition has gotten worse, better, or stayed

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Alcala

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of the Dry Needling Technique According to the Number of Incisions in the Treatment of Neck Pain

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 29, 2023
Registry last updated
May 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.