Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06650020

The Impact of Synchronous Online Learning on the Theoretical Training of New Paediatric Nurses

To examine the impact of synchronous online learning on the effectiveness of theoretical training and self-efficacy among newly graduated pediatric nurses.We carried out a Prospective randomized controlled trial.The sample comprised 45 newly graduated pediatric nurses randomly assigned to an experimental cohort group or a cohort group.The control group underwent traditional face-to-face teaching, whereas the experimental group engaged in synchronous online learning.Comparative analysis encompassed the test score from post-session 10-minute assessments, evaluations conducted after one week, and those after one month, alongside their academic self-efficacy scores.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Intervention

Age range

20 year–24 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032, China

About this study

Aims To examine the impact of synchronous online learning on the effectiveness of theoretical training and self-efficacy among newly graduated pediatric nurses.

Design Prospective randomized controlled trial. Methods The sample comprised 45 newly graduated pediatric nurses randomly assigned to an experimental cohort group or a cohort group.The control group underwent traditional face-to-face teaching, whereas the experimental group engaged in synchronous online learning.Comparative analysis encompassed the test score from post-session 10-minute assessments, evaluations conducted after one week, and those after one month, alongside their academic self-efficacy scores.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Novice pediatric nurses
  • Continued engagement in full-time nursing studies;
  • Successful completion of pre-employment training evaluation at the hospital.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to complete all specified training modules;
  • Unwillingness to participate in the study.

Treatment and study plan

synchronous online learning

Other

Each participant in this cohort selected a suitable and peaceful learning environment, characterized by ample lighting and strong network connectivity. Equipped with laptops, participants logged into the Tencet conference software ten minutes prior to the session, entered their authentic names, completed the sign-in process five minutes before the course started, and kept their cameras activated throughout the session. During the instructional phase, both the teacher and control group were physically present. While the teacher instructed the control group, screen sharing through Tencet conference software allowed trainees in the experimental group to have clear visual access to instructional materials while audibly receiving instruction through microphones.

the traditional offline model of centralized training

Other

The control group adhered to the traditional offline model of centralized training, which involved a training facility spanning 100 square meters and accommodating seating for 150 participants. The front section of the training room was equipped with various amenities, such as a projection screen, podium, computer, and microphone, all available for use by the instructors. Throughout the training period, the lecturer provided in-person instruction on-site, allowing trainees to engage in real-time interaction by raising their queries.

Primary outcomes

  1. Theoretical Evaluation Scores

    Time frame: The assessment occurred across multiple stages: the pre-class test, the 10-minute post-class test, one week, and one month.

    The examination paper was an internally developed document, with the instructor independently formulating the topics relevant to the course. The content was carefully aligned with the course's instructional material and underwent rigorous review by the teaching team. Each unit of course content was accompanied by five corresponding questions, including two single-choice, two multiple-choice, and one judgement-based query. Overall, the examination comprised 60 questions, each worth 2 points, resulting in a total of 120 points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Scores of Academic Self-efficacy

    Time frame: one month

    The evaluation questionnaire was divided into two domains: learning aptitude self-efficacy and learning behavioral self-efficacy, comprising a total of 22 test items. Learning aptitude self-efficacy refers to an individual's assessment and confidence in their ability to effectively navigate their studies, achieve commendable outcomes, and avoid academic shortcomings. On the other hand, learning behavioral self-efficacy focuses on an individual's evaluation and confidence in "relatively agree" earning 4 points, and "completely agree" earning 5 points. Within this structure, questions 14, 16, 17, and 20 are subject to reversed scoring. A higher cumulative score indicates increased academic self-efficacy. The combined total of the two dimensions represents the overall academic self-efficacy score. Similarly, a higher score indicates a heightened level of self-efficacy.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Synchronous Online Learning on the Theoretical Training of New Paediatric Nurses: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Oct 21, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 21, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.