Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01933841

The Impact of Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring in the PACU on Residual Blockade and Postoperative Recovery

Neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) provide anesthesiologists with powerful intraoperative tools, but their use carries the potential risk of serious postoperative complications. NMBD-induced muscle weakness that lingers into the postoperative period, known as postoperative residual curarization (PORC), is present in as many as 40% of all patients that receive neuromuscular blocking agents. The Post Anesthesia Care Unit will be introducing monitoring as part of standard of care. This study will collect data about patients who receive NMBDs and examine the impact of monitoring on incidences of PORC.

Our study is designed to test the following hypotheses:

Hypothesis 1: The initiation of quantitative TOF monitoring as part of the standard PACU entry evaluation will change practitioner behavior in a manner that decreases the incidence of PORC in surgical patients at VUMC.

Hypothesis 2: The initiation of the routine TOF monitoring program will decrease the incidence of short- and long-term postoperative complications at VUMC.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

About this study

Neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) provide anesthesiologists with powerful intraoperative tools, but their use carries the potential risk of serious postoperative complications. NMBD-induced muscle weakness that lingers into the postoperative period, known as postoperative residual curarization (PORC), is present in as many as 40% of all patients that receive neuromuscular blocking agents. Physiological data suggest that PORC impairs normal respiratory function, and compelling evidence suggests PORC impairs clinical recovery in the immediate postoperative period and prolongs PACU length of stay. However, despite the widespread use of NMBDs and the frequent occurrence of PORC, limitations in the literature prevent an understanding of their full impact on clinical outcomes. This study will collect data about patients who receive NMBDs and examine the impact of monitoring on incidences of PORC.

The incidence of PORC and postoperative complications after the introduction of monitoring in the PACU will be determined by measuring TOF ratios and tracking the postoperative outcomes in the surgical patients over time.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Surgical patients > 18 years of age
  • Received one or more NMBDs during surgery
  • Surgery took place during the first 120 days following the introduction of TOF monitoring in the PACU

Exclusion criteria

  • Surgical patients < 18 years of age
  • Received no NMBDs during surgery
  • Transfer from the OR to the PACU was delayed (by high PACU volume, for example)
  • Had a procedure or has a preexisting condition that prevents accurate monitoring

Treatment and study plan

TOF-Watch SX

Device

As part of standard care, patients who undergo intraoperative neuromuscular blockade will have their TOF ratio measured and recorded during their first 10 minutes in the PACU by perioperative nursing staff.

Other names: Acceleromyographic monitoring

Notify the provider

Procedure

Based on the TOF reading, the patient's PACU nurse will page the provider who administered the block and/or a designated "Reversal Support" team member. The page will identify the patient and notify the provider of the suboptimal TOF ratio.

Primary outcomes

  1. Decrease in incidence of postoperative residual curarization

    Time frame: 10 minute after arrival to PACU

    This aim will test the hypothesis that initiation of quantitative Train-Of-Four monitoring as part of the standard PACU entry evaluation will change practitioner behavior in a manner that decreases the incidence of PORC in surgical patients at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Quantitative TOF monitoring will be introduced as a standard component of the PACU entry evaluation for all patients that receive NMBDs as part of their care. It is expected that the proportion of patients with TOF < 0.9 will decrease over time after initiation of the routine monitoring system.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Decrease in the incidence of hemoglobin desaturation

    Time frame: PACU stay (Typically 1-2 hours post-operatively)

    This aim is part of a group of aims which will test the hypothesis that initiation of the routine TOF monitoring program will decrease short-term postoperative complications.

  2. Decrease in need for reintubation

    Time frame: 24 hours after PACU entry

    This aim is part of a group of aims which will test the hypothesis that initiation of the routine TOF monitoring program will decrease short-term postoperative complications.

  3. Decrease in length of stay in the PACU

    Time frame: PACU stay (Typically 1-2 hours post-operatively)

    This aim is part of a group of aims which will test the hypothesis that initiation of the routine TOF monitoring program will decrease short-term postoperative complications.

  4. Decrease in incidence of perioperative pneumonia

    Time frame: 28 days post-operatively

    This aim is part of a group of aims which will test the hypothesis that initiation of the routine TOF monitoring program will decrease long-term postoperative complications.

  5. Decrease in time to readiness for discharge

    Time frame: Hospital stay (Expected average of 3 days)

    This aim is part of a group of aims which will test the hypothesis that initiation of the routine TOF monitoring program will decrease long-term postoperative complications.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Sep 2, 2013
Registry last updated
Sep 4, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.