Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05016570

The Impact of Picture Narrative Format on Print Lung Screening Communication Outcomes

The purpose of this study is to test whether a picture narrative format is more successful, than text with pictures or text alone, in communicating lung screening information (primarily defined by positive attitudes towards the design and increase in knowledge) to people likely to be invited to lung screening where available.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

49 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow

Glasgow, G12 0XH, United Kingdom

About this study

Population screening is key to detecting lung cancer early at a more treatable stage. Uptake of screening should be equitable (i.e., screening benefits all eligible members of the population and does not contribute further to health disparities) and informed (i.e., participants have been involved in the decision to take part and their decision aligns with their values and circumstances). Print decision support materials are the primary mechanism for encouraging engagement with cancer screening and supporting decision making. It is essential that we identify print communication techniques that are effective in informing invitees about lung screening.

The intervention, picture narrative information about lung screening, was previously developed through codesign and prototype testing with people likely to be eligible for lung screening (50 to 75 years old, past or current heavy smokers). Participants will be randomised to one of three groups: Picture narrative format, Text with pictures (control 1) or, Text-only (control 2). This study will assess whether presenting lung screening information in a picture narrative format can improve lung cancer screening knowledge, eligibility self-assessment and attitudes. It will also assess whether perceptions of the information designs can explain any impact of the intervention on these outcomes and whether there are differences across socioeconomic groups.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Living in Glasgow
  • Willing and able to respond unaided to invitation to participate in the trial and give informed consent.
  • Aged between 49 and 75 years

Exclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Picture narrative information format

Behavioral

Lung screening information formatted as picture narratives

Text with pictures information format

Behavioral

Lung screening information formatted as text and non-narrative pictures

Text-only information format

Behavioral

Lung screening information formatted as text with no pictures

Primary outcomes

  1. Participant Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge scores

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Participants will be asked 6 multiple choice questions related to the lung screening information presented to the participants during the intervention, covering; Procedure, Eligibility - who, Eligibility - why, Benefits, Adverse effects, Potential results.

  2. Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility self-assessment

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Concordance between self-reported personal eligibility for lung cancer screening and actual eligibility based on self-reported age and smoking behaviour.

  3. Participant Lung Cancer Screening Attitudes

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Self-administered four-item lung cancer screening attitudes measure covering cancer fear, fatalism, benefits, and worry, previously used by Smits et al 2018.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant Design appraisal ratings

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Self-administered nine-item measure rating perceptions of appeal, enjoyment, interest, ease of use, trustworthiness, appropriateness, helpfulness, informativity.

    Alongside a single item asking participants whether enough information was provided.

Other outcomes

  1. Treatment compliance

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

    Self-reported length of time spent reading the lung screening information.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Glasgow

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Picture Narrative Format on Knowledge and Acceptability for Lung Screening Print Decision Support Materials

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Aug 23, 2021
Registry last updated
Oct 26, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.