Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06309316

The Impact of Person Centred Care (PCC) in Grave's Disease

Mental fatigue (MF) is prevalent after Graves' disease (GD), which is the most common form of hyperthyroidism. We have reported that 38% of patients, compared to 11% of control subjects, suffer from MF more than 1 year after successfully reversing of their hyperthyroidism and that MF is an entity of its own, separated from MF combined with anxiety or depression. The brain pathophysiology is unknown and there is no medical treatment, which requires patients to simply adapt to the situation. In the new national guideline for hyperthyroidism (Jan 2023), rehabilitation is recommended, but currently rarely offered to these patients. The problem is significant for patients, as illustrated by frequent media appeals. In this project, we hypothesise that person-centred care (PCC), which promotes positive coping strategies and increases self-efficacy by engaging patients as partners in their own care, improves MF, reduces sick leave, and lowers the recurrence rate of GD. In two work packages (WP), we will:

WP1 Evaluate the effect of PCC eHealth intervention (telephone and digital platform) as an add-on to usual care vs usual care alone in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 220 patients on self-efficacy, days of sick-leave (composite score as primary outcome), MF, recurrence rate of disease, coping strategies, perceived stress, quality of life (QoL) and personality.

WP2 Investigate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention

Patients with GD have impaired long-term QoL. PCC could improve long-term outcomes of this autoimmune disease and may apply to other patient groups. This is in line with the societal aim to reduce mental illness.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Graves Disease Autoimmune Diseases Behavior Behavioral Symptoms Endocrine System Diseases Exophthalmos Eye Diseases Fatigue Goiter Hyperthyroidism Immune System Diseases Mental Fatigue Orbital Diseases Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms Thyroid Diseases

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Agneta Lindo

Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Agneta Lindo

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4676-6185481

Helena Filipsson Nyström

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • First time Graves' diseases with elevated FT4 and/or FT3 and positive TSH receptor antibody (TRAb)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients that cannot attend to the protocol
  • Patients with moderate-severe/ severe Graves' eye disease

Treatment and study plan

Person-centred care (PCC)

Behavioral

In addition to usual care, patients will receive PCC through physical visits, telephone and through a web-based platform for 15-months. Primary outcome is after 3 month (we expect the need of support is largest in the beginning) but the intervention will continue for the period of care 12-18 months, increasing transferability to regular care.

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite score of changes

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    A patient is classified as improved, deteriorated or unchanged:

    A patient is classified as improved if:

    at 3 months increased general self-efficacy by ≥ 5 units and reduced sick leave percentage (or unchanged if no sick-leave at baseline) at 3 months follow-up

    A patient is classified as deteriorated if:

    at 3 months reduced general self-efficacy by ≥ 5 units or increased sick-leave percentage (or unchanged if on full-time sick leave at inclusion) Those who have neither improved or deteriorated are classified as unchanged

Secondary outcomes

  1. General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire General Self-Efficacy. Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.

  2. General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire General Self-Efficacy. Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.

  3. General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire General Self-Efficacy. Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.

  4. General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire General Self-Efficacy. Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.

  5. Days of sick-leave

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up.

    Evaluated sick leave days between the intervention and the control group.

  6. Days of sick-leave

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    Evaluated sick leave days between the intervention and the control group.

  7. Days of sick-leave

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up.

    Evaluated sick leave days between the intervention and the control group.

  8. Days of sick-leave

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up.

    Evaluated sick leave days between the intervention and the control group.

  9. Mental fatigue score

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up.

    Scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale are compared between the intervention and the control group. Scores is between 0-42 and higher scores mean more brain fatigue.

  10. Mental fatigue score

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    Scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale are compared between the intervention and the control group. Scores is between 0-42 and higher scores mean more brain fatigue.

  11. Mental fatigue score

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up.

    Scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale are compared between the intervention and the control group. Scores is between 0-42 and higher scores mean more brain fatigue.

  12. Mental fatigue score

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up.

    Scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale are compared between the intervention and the control group. Scores is between 0-42 and higher scores mean more brain fatigue.

  13. Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (Brief cope)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Brief cope. The Brief COPE is a shorter version of the COPE Inventory composed of 28-items rated on a 4-point ordinal scale that measure 14 subscales of coping style (2-items each). The overall mean is calculated with more than three being worse outcome. Coping strategies are compared between the intervention and the control group.

  14. Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (Brief cope)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Brief cope. The Brief COPE is a shorter version of the COPE Inventory composed of 28-items rated on a 4-point ordinal scale that measure 14 subscales of coping style (2-items each). The overall mean is calculated with more than three being worse outcome. Coping strategies are compared between the intervention and the control group.

  15. Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (Brief cope)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Brief cope. The Brief COPE is a shorter version of the COPE Inventory composed of 28-items rated on a 4-point ordinal scale that measure 14 subscales of coping style (2-items each). The overall mean is calculated with more than three being worse outcome. Coping strategies are compared between the intervention and the control group.

  16. Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (Brief cope)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Brief cope. The Brief COPE is a shorter version of the COPE Inventory composed of 28-items rated on a 4-point ordinal scale that measure 14 subscales of coping style (2-items each). The overall mean is calculated with more than three being worse outcome. Coping strategies are compared between the intervention and the control group.

  17. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The total score ranges between 0 and 56, with a higher score indicate more symptoms of stress.

  18. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The total score ranges between 0 and 56, with a higher score indicate more symptoms of stress.

  19. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The total score ranges between 0 and 56, with a higher score indicate more symptoms of stress.

  20. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The total score ranges between 0 and 56, with a higher score indicate more symptoms of stress.

  21. Personality Assessment Guardian NEO-FFI-3

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up.

    The NEO Five Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3) is a measure of the five domains of personality: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness.

  22. Personality Assessment Guardian NEO-FFI-3

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    The NEO Five Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3) is a measure of the five domains of personality: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness.

  23. Personality Assessment Guardian NEO-FFI-3

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up.

    The NEO Five Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3) is a measure of the five domains of personality: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness.

  24. Personality Assessment Guardian NEO-FFI-3

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up.

    The NEO Five Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3) is a measure of the five domains of personality: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness.

  25. Comprehensive psychopathological rating questionnaire (CPRS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. Higher scores at the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale mean more symptoms of anxiety and depression. The Scores for anxiety is between 0-27 and for depression is between 0-27.

  26. Comprehensive psychopathological rating questionnaire (CPRS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. Higher scores at the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale mean more symptoms of anxiety and depression. The Scores for anxiety is between 0-27 and for depression is between 0-27.

  27. Comprehensive psychopathological rating questionnaire (CPRS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. Higher scores at the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale mean more symptoms of anxiety and depression. The Scores for anxiety is between 0-27 and for depression is between 0-27.

  28. Comprehensive psychopathological rating questionnaire (CPRS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. Higher scores at the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale mean more symptoms of anxiety and depression. The Scores for anxiety is between 0-27 and for depression is between 0-27.

  29. Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. ThyPRO scales is scored as a summary score and linearly transformed to range 0- 100. Higher scores at the Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form means worse quality of life.

  30. Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. ThyPRO scales is scored as a summary score and linearly transformed to range 0- 100. Higher scores at the Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form means worse quality of life.

  31. Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. ThyPRO scales is scored as a summary score and linearly transformed to range 0- 100. Higher scores at the Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form means worse quality of life.

  32. Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. ThyPRO scales is scored as a summary score and linearly transformed to range 0- 100. Higher scores at the Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form means worse quality of life.

  33. Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL).

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The range of each score is from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating better health.

  34. Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL).

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The range of each score is from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating better health.

  35. Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL).

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The range of each score is from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating better health.

  36. Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL).

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. The range of each score is from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating better health.

  37. EuroQol- health questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire EuroQol- health (EQ-5D). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. Each question may have 1 of 3-level answers, and a visual analog scale (VAS) on which patients can mark their current health state. The EQ-5D-3L index is calculated by subtracting the values of the descriptive EQ-5D system from the numerical value 1. This corresponds to the best possible health status, while an index value of <0 represents the worst possible health status.

  38. EuroQol- health questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire EuroQol- health (EQ-5D). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. Each question may have 1 of 3-level answers, and a visual analog scale (VAS) on which patients can mark their current health state. The EQ-5D-3L index is calculated by subtracting the values of the descriptive EQ-5D system from the numerical value 1. This corresponds to the best possible health status, while an index value of <0 represents the worst possible health status.

  39. EuroQol- health questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire EuroQol- health (EQ-5D). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. Each question may have 1 of 3-level answers, and a visual analog scale (VAS) on which patients can mark their current health state. The EQ-5D-3L index is calculated by subtracting the values of the descriptive EQ-5D system from the numerical value 1. This corresponds to the best possible health status, while an index value of <0 represents the worst possible health status.

  40. EuroQol- health questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire EuroQol- health (EQ-5D). Scores are compared between the intervention and the control group. Each question may have 1 of 3-level answers, and a visual analog scale (VAS) on which patients can mark their current health state. The EQ-5D-3L index is calculated by subtracting the values of the descriptive EQ-5D system from the numerical value 1. This corresponds to the best possible health status, while an index value of <0 represents the worst possible health status.

  41. Frenchay Activities Index (FAI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated Frenchay Activities Index (FAI). Compare function and work ability between the intervention and the control group. Questionnaire consisting of 15 items on frequency of social everyday activities and the score is based on the frequency with which an activity has been performed during the previous 3 or 6 months. The total score ranges from 0 (inactive) to 45 (very active).

  42. Frenchay Activities Index (FAI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated Frenchay Activities Index (FAI). Compare function and work ability between the intervention and the control group. Questionnaire consisting of 15 items on frequency of social everyday activities and the score is based on the frequency with which an activity has been performed during the previous 3 or 6 months. The total score ranges from 0 (inactive) to 45 (very active).

  43. Frenchay Activities Index (FAI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated Frenchay Activities Index (FAI). Compare function and work ability between the intervention and the control group. Questionnaire consisting of 15 items on frequency of social everyday activities and the score is based on the frequency with which an activity has been performed during the previous 3 or 6 months. The total score ranges from 0 (inactive) to 45 (very active).

  44. Frenchay Activities Index (FAI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated Frenchay Activities Index (FAI). Compare function and work ability between the intervention and the control group. Questionnaire consisting of 15 items on frequency of social everyday activities and the score is based on the frequency with which an activity has been performed during the previous 3 or 6 months. The total score ranges from 0 (inactive) to 45 (very active).

  45. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Compare Work Productivity and Activity between the intervention and the control group.

    Four main outcomes can be generated from the WPAI-GH and expressed in percentages by multiplying the following scores by 100: 1) percent work time missed due to health = Q2/(Q2 + Q4) for those who were currently employed; 2) percent impairment while working due to health = Q5/10 for those who were currently employed and actually worked in the past seven days; 3) percent overall work impairment due to health Q2/(Q2 + Q4) + ((1 - Q2/(Q2 + Q4)) × (Q5/10)) for those who were currently employed; 4) percent activity impairment due to health Q6/10 for all respondents.

  46. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Compare Work Productivity and Activity between the intervention and the control group.

    Four main outcomes can be generated from the WPAI-GH and expressed in percentages by multiplying the following scores by 100: 1) percent work time missed due to health = Q2/(Q2 + Q4) for those who were currently employed; 2) percent impairment while working due to health = Q5/10 for those who were currently employed and actually worked in the past seven days; 3) percent overall work impairment due to health Q2/(Q2 + Q4) + ((1 - Q2/(Q2 + Q4)) × (Q5/10)) for those who were currently employed; 4) percent activity impairment due to health Q6/10 for all respondents.

  47. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Compare Work Productivity and Activity between the intervention and the control group.

    Four main outcomes can be generated from the WPAI-GH and expressed in percentages by multiplying the following scores by 100: 1) percent work time missed due to health = Q2/(Q2 + Q4) for those who were currently employed; 2) percent impairment while working due to health = Q5/10 for those who were currently employed and actually worked in the past seven days; 3) percent overall work impairment due to health Q2/(Q2 + Q4) + ((1 - Q2/(Q2 + Q4)) × (Q5/10)) for those who were currently employed; 4) percent activity impairment due to health Q6/10 for all respondents.

  48. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Evaluated by the validated Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Compare Work Productivity and Activity between the intervention and the control group.

    Four main outcomes can be generated from the WPAI-GH and expressed in percentages by multiplying the following scores by 100: 1) percent work time missed due to health = Q2/(Q2 + Q4) for those who were currently employed; 2) percent impairment while working due to health = Q5/10 for those who were currently employed and actually worked in the past seven days; 3) percent overall work impairment due to health Q2/(Q2 + Q4) + ((1 - Q2/(Q2 + Q4)) × (Q5/10)) for those who were currently employed; 4) percent activity impairment due to health Q6/10 for all respondents.

  49. Levels of thyroid autoantibodies

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Levels of thyroid autoantibodies, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between the intervention and the control group.

  50. Levels of thyroid autoantibodies

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Levels of thyroid autoantibodies, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between the intervention and the control group.

  51. Levels of thyroid autoantibodies

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Levels of thyroid autoantibodies, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between the intervention and the control group.

  52. Levels of thyroid autoantibodies

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Levels of thyroid autoantibodies, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between the intervention and the control group.

  53. Levels of thyroid hormones

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Levels of thyroid hormones, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between the intervention and the control group.

  54. Levels of thyroid hormones

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Levels of thyroid hormones, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between the intervention and the control group.

  55. Levels of thyroid hormones

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Levels of thyroid hormones, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between the intervention and the control group.

  56. Levels of thyroid hormones

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Levels of thyroid hormones, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between the intervention and the control group.

  57. Clinical Activity Score (CAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Comparison of Clinical Activity Score (a composite measure of ophthalmological signs and symptoms) between the intervention and the control group. Scores can be between 0-10 and higher scores mean more eye symptoms.

  58. Clinical Activity Score (CAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Comparison of Clinical Activity Score (a composite measure of ophthalmological signs and symptoms) between the intervention and the control group. Scores can be between 0-10 and higher scores mean more eye symptoms.

  59. Clinical Activity Score (CAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Comparison of Clinical Activity Score (a composite measure of ophthalmological signs and symptoms) between the intervention and the control group. Scores can be between 0-10 and higher scores mean more eye symptoms.

  60. Clinical Activity Score (CAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Comparison of Clinical Activity Score (a composite measure of ophthalmological signs and symptoms) between the intervention and the control group. Scores can be between 0-10 and higher scores mean more eye symptoms.

  61. Severity score

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Comparison of Severity score (a composite measure of ophthalmological signs and symptoms) between the intervention and the control group. Scores can be between 0-29 and higher scores mean more eye symptoms.

  62. Severity score

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Comparison of Severity score (a composite measure of ophthalmological signs and symptoms) between the intervention and the control group. Scores can be between 0-29 and higher scores mean more eye symptoms.

  63. Severity score

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Comparison of Severity score (a composite measure of ophthalmological signs and symptoms) between the intervention and the control group. Scores can be between 0-29 and higher scores mean more eye symptoms.

  64. Severity score

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Comparison of Severity score (a composite measure of ophthalmological signs and symptoms) between the intervention and the control group. Scores can be between 0-29 and higher scores mean more eye symptoms.

  65. Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Scale (SGPAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 weeks follow-up

    Physical activity level, 1-4 (4 highest activity level).

  66. Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Scale (SGPAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 3 months follow-up

    Physical activity level, 1-4 (4 highest activity level).

  67. Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Scale (SGPAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 6 months follow-up

    Physical activity level, 1-4 (4 highest activity level).

  68. Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Scale (SGPAS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline examined at 15 months follow-up

    Physical activity level, 1-4 (4 highest activity level).

  69. Composite score of changes

    Time frame: Change from 6weeks examined at 3 months follow-up.

    A patient is classified as improved, deteriorated or unchanged:

    A patient is classified as improved if:

    at 3 months increased general self-efficacy by ≥ 5 units and reduced sick leave percentage (or unchanged if no sick-leave at baseline) at 3 months follow-up

    A patient is classified as deteriorated if:

    at 3 months reduced general self-efficacy by ≥ 5 units or increased sick-leave percentage (or unchanged if on full-time sick leave at inclusion) Those who have neither improved or deteriorated are classified as unchanged

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Agneta Lindo

CONTACT

[email protected]

+46766185481

Helena Filipsson Nyström

CONTACT

[email protected]

0705833398

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vastra Gotaland Region

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Person Centred Care (PCC) on Mental Outcome and Work Ability in Graves' Disease - the GRAves CarE (GRACE) PCC Project

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Mar 13, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 21, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.