This is a single-center, randomized, two-group parallel-assignment interventional trial conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital to compare the effectiveness of neuronavigation-guided rTMS versus conventional rTMS in subacute stroke patients with hemiparesis.
Background: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is recognized for its potential in stroke rehabilitation, with low-frequency (1 Hz) stimulation over the unaffected motor cortex in the subacute phase rated as Grade A (definitely effective) for upper limb motor recovery. However, the efficacy of rTMS is highly dependent on accurate and consistent coil placement over the target cortical area.
Study Hypothesis: We hypothesize that using neuronavigation-which integrates infrared tracking with brain MRI to establish a precise 3D coordinate reference-will significantly increase the treatment precision, reduce the required localization time, and ultimately lead to superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional manual targeting methods.
Intervention Details:
- Participants: 30 eligible patients (age 20-85) who are 2 weeks to 6 months post-stroke and demonstrate unilateral upper limb weakness will be enrolled.
- Stimulation Parameters: All participants will receive low-frequency rTMS (1 Hz) at 80% of the motor threshold (RMT). Each session consists of 1,200 pulses delivered over approximately 20 minutes.
- Grouping:
(1)Experimental Group (n=15): Coil positioning will be guided by a neuronavigational system throughout all 10 sessions. The system tracks the coil and patient's head relative to the initial M1 hotspot.
(2)Control Group (n=15): Coil positioning will rely on standard manual localization (e.g., cap positioning).
Outcome Assessments:
The study will track three primary outcomes: FMA score (a key measure of motor function), coil positioning deviation (a measure of precision), and the time required for initial hotspot localization. Secondary outcomes include functional and spasticity measures such as the Barthel Index (BI), Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Modified Ashworth Scale (mAS), and neurophysiological parameters (MEP, EEG).
Timeline:
All outcome measures will be assessed at three time points: Baseline (T0), Post-treatment (T1, Week 3), and 1-month Follow-up (T2, Week 7).
Safety:
All adverse events, including rare severe events like seizures (<0.01%) and syncope, will be managed according to standard emergency protocols, and treatment will be discontinued if adverse effects persist or significant clinical weakness occurs. The study protocol is within established safety guidelines.