Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07468097

The Impact of Metabolic Status on Pain and Central Sensitization in Women With Lipedema: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of metabolic markers (HOMA-IR, triglyceride/HDL ratio, HbA1c, waist and hip circumference measurements, BMI, etc.) on pain and central sensitization in patients diagnosed with lipedema. The primary objective is to investigate the association between metabolic markers and central sensitization. The secondary objective is to assess the relationship between metabolic markers and pain intensity, pain phenotype, and functional status.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Marmara University Faculty of Medicine Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Pendik, 34890, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Secretary General Secretary

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 2166254545

About this study

Lipedema is a chronic disorder observed in women, characterized by symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue in the lower extremities, easy bruising, and marked tenderness or pain. In lipedema, pain is often spontaneous, increases with pressure, and does not always correlate with the amount of adipose tissue. This suggests that lipedema-related pain cannot be explained solely by peripheral mechanical factors.

Previous studies in patients with lipedema have demonstrated reduced pressure pain thresholds, bilateral and symmetrical hyperalgesia, and increased pain sensitivity extending beyond the areas of local adipose tissue involvement. These findings suggest that alterations in central pain processing mechanisms may occur in lipedema and that central sensitization may play a role. However, systematic studies specifically evaluating central sensitization in lipedema remain limited.

Although lipedema has long been considered a "metabolically protected" condition, recent studies have reported that insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and components of metabolic syndrome are more frequently observed, particularly in lipedema cases accompanied by obesity. HOMA-IR, which is used to evaluate insulin resistance; the triglyceride/HDL ratio (TG/HDL), a marker of atherogenic dyslipidemia; and HbA1c, reflecting long-term glycemic load, are closely associated with chronic inflammation and metabolic dysfunction.

In the chronic pain literature, metabolic dysfunction has been shown to play an important role in the development of central sensitization and nociplastic pain, with obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia being associated with central pain amplification. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies in lipedema have simultaneously evaluated the relationship between metabolic parameters, pain phenotype, and central sensitization.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of metabolic markers (HOMA-IR, triglyceride/HDL ratio, HbA1c, waist and hip circumference measurements, BMI, etc.) on pain and central sensitization in patients diagnosed with lipedema. The primary objective is to investigate the association between metabolic markers and central sensitization. The secondary objective is to assess the relationship between metabolic markers and pain intensity, pain phenotype, and functional status.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being female and aged 18 years or older
  • Having chronic pain persisting for at least 3 months
  • Having sufficient cognitive ability to understand and respond to the assessment scales used in the study
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of a history of malignancy, active infection, inflammatory rheumatic disease, or severe systemic disease
  • History of known neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy)
  • Diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Presence of cognitive impairment or communication difficulties that could affect the study results
  • Diagnosed diabetes mellitus
  • Active thyroid disease (uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism)
  • Cushing's syndrome or other significant endocrine disorders
  • Use of antidiabetic medications
  • Use of lipid-lowering therapy (e.g., statins, fibrates)
  • Systemic glucocorticoid use within the past 3 months
  • Use of medications that may significantly affect central pain mechanisms (e.g., high-dose opioids, antipsychotic drugs)
  • History of major surgery or invasive treatment for pain within the past 3 months

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)

    Time frame: At baseline

    The Central Sensitization Inventory is a self-report screening tool developed to assess the presence and severity of symptoms associated with central sensitization. The inventory evaluates symptoms reflecting sensitization in central nervous system pain-processing mechanisms, including widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive complaints. The CSI consists of 25 items, each scored on a scale from 0 to 4, with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. A total score of 40 or higher is considered to be associated with a high likelihood of central sensitization.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: At baseline

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is used to measure and monitor pain intensity. A score of "0" represents no pain, while "10" indicates the worst pain imaginable. Patients are asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10. Due to its simplicity and ease of understanding, this scale is frequently used in clinical research.

  2. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    Time frame: At baseline

    The Fatigue Severity Scale is a self-report measure used to evaluate the impact of fatigue on daily life and functional activities. The scale consists of 9 items, each scored on a scale from 1 to 7. Higher average scores indicate greater fatigue severity.

  3. Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4)

    Time frame: At baseline

    The DN4 questionnaire was developed to assess the presence of neuropathic pain. It consists of 10 items derived from symptom-based questions and clinical examination findings. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain.

  4. Short Form-12 (SF-12)

    Time frame: At baseline

    The Short Form-12 is a questionnaire used to assess general health status and health-related quality of life. It consists of 12 items. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

  5. Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS)

    Time frame: At baseline

    The Jenkins Sleep Scale is a self-report measure consisting of four items that evaluates the frequency of sleep problems experienced over the past month. Higher scores indicate a greater frequency of sleep disturbance symptoms, such as difficulty falling asleep, nocturnal awakenings, and early morning awakening.

  6. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)

    Time frame: At baseline

    The Lower Extremity Functional Scale is a self-report measure consisting of 20 items that evaluates lower extremity functional status during activities of daily living. Lower total scores indicate greater functional limitation, whereas higher scores reflect better lower extremity function.

  7. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

    Time frame: At baseline

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire is a measure consisting of seven items that assess the time spent walking, performing moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities, and sitting. The total score is calculated by considering the duration (minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity activity, and vigorous-intensity activity. Energy expenditure for these activities is expressed in MET-minutes. Standard MET values have been established for each activity: sitting 1.5 MET, walking 3.3 MET, moderate-intensity physical activity 4 MET, and vigorous-intensity physical activity 8 MET. Using these values, daily and weekly physical activity levels can be calculated.

Other outcomes

  1. HOMA-IR (Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance)

    Time frame: At baseline

    HOMA-IR is an index widely used to assess insulin resistance and is calculated using fasting glucose and fasting insulin levels. In this study, HOMA-IR will be calculated using the following formula:

    HOMA-IR = [Fasting insulin (µIU/mL) × Fasting glucose (mg/dL)] / 405.

    Although there is no universally accepted single cut-off value for HOMA-IR, studies conducted in adult populations commonly interpret HOMA-IR values as follows: <1.0 indicates normal insulin sensitivity, 1.0-1.9 borderline insulin resistance, and ≥2.0 suggestive of insulin resistance; particularly HOMA-IR ≥2.5 is frequently used as a threshold indicating insulin resistance. In this study, HOMA-IR will be evaluated both as a continuous variable and categorized according to these commonly used reference values in the literature.

  2. Triglyceride/HDL Cholesterol (TG/HDL) Ratio

    Time frame: At baseline

    The TG/HDL ratio is a metabolic indicator obtained by dividing the serum triglyceride level by the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) level and is associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. In this study, the TG/HDL ratio will be calculated using the formula TG (mg/dL) / HDL (mg/dL).

    Although there is no universally accepted cut-off value for the TG/HDL ratio, studies conducted in adult populations commonly classify values as follows: <2.0 normal, 2.0-3.0 borderline, and ≥3.0 indicative of increased metabolic risk; particularly TG/HDL ≥3.5 is frequently considered associated with insulin resistance and increased cardiometabolic risk. In this study, the TG/HDL ratio will be categorized according to these commonly used reference values in the literature.

  3. Waist-to-Hip Ratio

    Time frame: At baseline

    The waist-to-hip ratio is calculated by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference and is used to assess abdominal fat distribution. In women, a value of ≥0.85 is considered indicative of central obesity and increased cardiometabolic risk.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Fatma B Akdağ

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 537 452 96 60

Yeliz Özdemir

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 536 846 94 97

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Marmara University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 12, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 12, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.