Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03695536

The Impact of Integration of Ultrasound on CPR Quality - A Video Review Study

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients with cardiac arrest. However, some factors are known to be related with delays in chest compressions such as bed transfer, setting of CPR device, pulse and rhythm checks. This study aims to evaluate the potential impact of ultrasound on CPR quality by using retrospective video analysis.

All CPR scenarios in our department were recorded and masked for the purpose of video analysis. The investigators will record in-scene resuscitation manpower, the factors to interrupt chest compressions and whether introducing ultrasound into resuscitation process is related with delays in chest compressions. In addition, the investigators collect the patient's sex, age, initial rhythm and prognosis, including ROSC, survival to admission and survival to discharge.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

adult patients (more than 20 years) non-traumatic cardiac arrest

Exclusion criteria

traumatic cardiac arrest age less than 20 years.

Treatment and study plan

ultrasound use during resuscitation

Behavioral

ultrasound use during resuscitation

Primary outcomes

  1. Ultrasound use would not delay in chest compressions during resuscitation.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    chest compression fraction (chest compression time/total resuscitation time) between two groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ultrasound use would not influence the rates of return of spontaneous circulation.

    Time frame: 60 mintues

    rates of return of spontaneous circulation.

  2. Ultrasound use would not influence the rates of survival to admission.

    Time frame: 7 days.

    rates of survival to admision between two groups.

  3. Ultrasound use would not influence the rates of survival to discharge.

    Time frame: 3 months.

    rates of survival to discharge between two groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Integration of Ultrasound on CPR Quality - A Video Review

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Oct 4, 2018
Registry last updated
May 12, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.