Moscow Scientific Clinical Center
Moscow, 111123, Russia
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Kristina Kadantseva, MD
CONTACT
Valerii Subbotin, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT04800393
Even decade ago it was believed that the choice method of anesthesia did not affect the course of the oncological process, but recent evidence has begun to emerge that inhalation anesthesia vs TIVA is associated with a higher number of adverse outcomes. Apparently, it makes sense to conduct mRCT in order to assess the effect of IA on immune system in patients operated on for breast cancer comprehensively. The results of that kind of RCT may finally give us an answer whether the choice of anesthesia affects the immune status of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The evaluation of complications and long-term survival will allow to recommend to use or not to use IA for this type of surgery.
Objective: The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Interested in participating?
Request Info45 year–74 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Moscow, 111123, Russia
Location status: Recruiting
Kristina Kadantseva, MD
CONTACT
Valerii Subbotin, PhD
CONTACT
The power calculation for this study was based on an assessment of Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients undergoing breast cancer resection with total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia in two studies:
The pooled mean NLR in the TIVA group is 3.25±1.34, in the inhalation anesthesia group: 4.03±1.78.
Difference in means (effect size): 0.78, for level α=0.05, power 1-β=80% and expected standard deviation of 1.5, 65 patients in each group should be recruited, taking into account a 10% margin (total number of patients: 130).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
induction of anesthesia with propofol, maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane during breast cancer surgery
propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during breast cancer surgery
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Absolute number of neutrophils divided by the absolute number of lymphocytes
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Absolute number of neutrophils divided by the absolute number of lymphocytes
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
ng/mL
Time frame: 24 hour after surgery
ng/mL
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
mg/L
Time frame: 24 hour after surgery
mg/L
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 24 hour after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
the ratio of T helper cells to cytotoxic T cells
Time frame: 24 hour after surgery
the ratio of T helper cells to cytotoxic T cells
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
pg/ml
Time frame: 24 hour after surgery
pg/ml
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Absolute number (х 10 /L)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 24 hour after surgery
Absolute number (х 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
percentage
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
percentage
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
percentage
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
percentage
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
g/L
Time frame: 1 year
percentage of survival patients
Time frame: 3 year
percentage of survival patients
Time frame: 5 year
percentage of survival patients
Time frame: 1 year
percentage of survival patients
Time frame: 3 year
percentage of survival patients
Time frame: 5 year
percentage of survival patients
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Kristina Kadantseva
CONTACT
Valerii Subbotin, PhD
CONTACT
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Other
The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial (TeMP - Trial).
Acronym: TeMP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02647385
Agnosia, Anesthesia
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06404983
Anesthesia, Breast Cancer
Ioannina, Epirus, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06711549
Anesthesia, Breast Cancer
View Trial DetailsNCT03653988
Anesthesia, Breast Cancer
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial Details