Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01837706

The Impact of Emergency Physician Empathy on Litigation Propensity

The purpose of this study is to observe whether people would report being less likely to sue a physician who shows more empathy when giving a patient potentially bad news regarding their medical condition.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Loma Linda University Emergency Department

Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States

About this study

The investigators hypothesized that patients will have less propensity to sue emergency physicians after a poor outcome if the physician demonstrated empathy by verbalizing that they recognize the patient is concerned about their symptoms, and that the patient knows their typical state of health better than a physician seeing them for the first time. Accordingly, the investigators will assess whether the presence or absence of emergency physician empathetic statements in videotaped simulated encounters will alter patient propensity towards litigation. Secondary objectives are to assess whether the presence or absence of empathetic statements alters patient perceptions of discharge instruction clarity, physician expertness, physician caring, and physician desirability.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Emergency Room Patient

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-English speaking
  • Not healthy enough to be in waiting room

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Intention to sue

    Time frame: Immediately after viewing

    This outcome will be assessed by asking "Would you sue this doctor?" after viewing a short video. Items will be measured on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely no to 5=Definitely yes).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of physician expertise

    Time frame: Immediately after viewing

    This outcome will be assessed by asking "Do you believe this physician is an expert?" after viewing a short video. Items will be measured on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely no to 5=Definitely yes).

  2. Assessment of physician caring

    Time frame: Immediately after viewing

    This outcome will be assessed by asking "Do you think this doctor cared about the patient?" after viewing a short video. Items will be measured on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely no to 5=Definitely yes).

  3. Assessment of whether subject would want to be physician's patient

    Time frame: Immediately after viewing

    This outcome will be assessed by asking "Would you want this physician as your doctor?" after viewing a short video. Items will be measured on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely no to 5=Definitely yes).

  4. Assessment of clarity of physician instructions

    Time frame: Immediatley after viewing

    This outcome will be assessed by asking "Did you understand the instructions the doctor gave the patient?" after viewing a short video. Items will be measured on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely no to 5=Definitely yes).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Apr 23, 2013
Registry last updated
Oct 3, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.