Bruno Araújo Procópio de Alvarenga
Lisbon, 1700-228, Portugal
NCT Number: NCT03361592
Athletes have been exposed to an ever increasing training load and subsequent biomechanical overload due to a constant demand for performance enhancement. As a result, it is observed an increased rate of musculoskeletal problems, including spinal biomechanical dysfunctions that are often asymptomatic. These dysfunctions are believed to negatively influence a wide range of mechanical and physiological parameters such as muscle strength, range of motion, and symmetry, what could potentially influence sports performance.
Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT) is a safe and effective therapy for musculoskeletal disorders that has been increasingly utilized in sports. SMT purpose is to correct spinal joints biomechanical dysfunctions using a high-velocity, low-amplitude movement, applied at the paraphysiological space, beyond the passive joint range of motion.
Kinetic and kinematic symmetry can be measured in commonly utilized physical functional tests often used as indicators of athlete's performance. Symmetry Index calculation is used to verify bilateral asymmetries in static and dynamic tests.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lisbon, 1700-228, Portugal
Therefore, the objective of this randomized controlled trial study is to measure the immediate effects of lumbar SMT on kinetic and kinematic symmetry of asymptomatic athletes, through of the use of three commonly used functional tests: Static posture, Free Squat, and Countermovement Jump (CMJ) are often used as indicators of athlete's performance. These quantitative data is important to assess training effectiveness and prevention/ rehabilitation programs outcomes. To our knowledge this is the first study on literature that measured the immediate effects of SMT on kinetic and kinematic symmetry.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria for sample followed the assumptions below:
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria for sample followed the assumptions below:
Lumbar (SMT) was performed using Diversified techniques, aiming to correct vertebral dysfunctional lumbar segments. Participants were asked to lay down prone on, to perform spinal motion palpation analysis was in order to evaluate the presence of dysfunction in vertebral segments of lumbar spine.
Other names: Movement Disorders/therapy, Spinal Manipulation
The "SHAM" (pre-load positioning SMT) was performed with participant body positioning in the lateral position, as the SMT intervention. The doctor followed the participant through the same position of (SMT) intervention, using the maintenance of set-up position, but no manipulative thrust was delivered. The therapist applied minimal pressure and slid their hands across the skin to mimic the manipulative trust. The position was maintained 30 seconds on each side, and none of force or researcher body weight were putted in this procedure, only minimal pressure common to stabilize the set up position of (SMT).
Other names: Control Group
Time frame: 5 min after lumbar SMT intervention
Lower Limbs Ground Reaction Forces measured by the force platforms
Time frame: 5 min after lumbar SMT intervention
Linear Global Joint Centers Vectors Displacement measured by the 3D motion capture system
University of Lisbon
Other
Immediate Effects of Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT) on Kinetic and Kinematic Symmetry on Functional Performance Tests: a Test-retest, Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06705192
Asymptomatic Condition, Asymptomatic Diseases
Rotterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06048237
Asymptomatic Condition, Asymptomatic Diseases
Pátrai, Achaia, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT05899244
Asymptomatic Condition, Asymptomatic Diseases
Liège, Liege, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05210231
Asymptomatic Condition, Asymptomatic Diseases
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
View Trial Details