Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00032591

The Home INR Study

Since home monitors of prothrombin time (PT) may potentially improve the safety, quality, and convenience of chronic anticoagulation management, it is likely that there will be demands from providers, patients, and manufacturers to make home monitors available to VA patients. The rationale for patient self-testing (PST) is that, compared to conventional high quality anticoagulation management (HQACM), it would permit more intense monitoring and increased patient participation in his/her own care, resulting in increased precision in anticoagulation control and thus fewer events of thromboembolism (strokes) and bleeding. The secondary hypothesis is that PST and HQACM will be comparable in terms of health care utilization and cost.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

VA Medical Center, San Juan, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Intervention: Weekly patient self-testing (PST) of prothrombin time by international normalized ratio (PT INR) versus conventional monthly high quality anticoagulation management (HQACM) from an anticoagulation clinic with a minimum two years follow-up.

Primary Hypothesis: Compared to conventional monitoring in the clinic, PST of anticoagulation intensity will decrease the number of events of thromboembolism (strokes), bleeding, and all cause deaths and improve the quality of anticoagulation.

Second Hypothesis: PST and conventional monitoring will be comparable in terms of health care utilization and cost.

Primary Outcomes: Event rates (thromboembolism or bleeding episodes), time to first event, time within therapeutic range for anticoagulation intensity, and total health care cost (including price of PST monitors) and utilization.

Study Abstract: Since home monitors of prothrombin time (PT) may potentially improve the safety, quality, and convenience of chronic anticoagulation management, it is likely that there will be demands from providers, patients, and manufacturers to make home monitors available to VA patients. The rationale for PST is that it would permit more intense monitoring and increased patient participation in his/her own care, resulting in increased precision in anticoagulation control and thus fewer events.

Original plan was for a study at 32 sites with a total sample size of about 3,200 patients and a length of three years (one for recruitment and two years of follow-up). Final status was 28 sites that randomized 2922 patients in 2.75 years of recruitment with a minimum of two years of follow-up.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

To be enrolled in this study, patients must:

  • have AF and/or a MHV;
  • be scheduled to receive warfarin indefinitely (operationally defined as 2 years);
  • be using warfarin according to the criteria described in the Coumadin package insert (no off-label uses);
  • be expected to survive for the duration of the study;
  • not be suffering from intracranial bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke) or any other contraindication described in the Coumadin package insert;
  • be willing to perform PST;
  • be willing to be randomized;
  • possess adequate cognitive and language skills to follow the protocol and all related instructions;
  • be willing to participate for the full duration of the study;
  • sign the informed consent form; and
  • not be enrolled in another randomized clinical trial that involves a drug or device intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Patients are excluded in this study if:

  • subject has had intracranial hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, or any other absolute/major contraindication described in the warfarin package insert within the last month
  • subject enrolled in another randomized clinical trial that involves a drug or device intervention
  • subject is not able to follow the protocol and all related instructions, and does not have a caregiver with these skills

Treatment and study plan

Weekly patient self-testing of prothrombin time

Procedure

High quality anticoagulation management (HQACM) with conventional monthly testing

Other

HQACM with testing every 4 weeks and as indicated for out of range values, medication/clinical changes.

Other names: HQACM

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Event (Death, Stroke, Major Bleed)

    Time frame: Time to event

    Time to first event (death, stroke, major bleed)

    The primary outcome was time to first event, and we used the Kaplan-Meier method to compare survival curves and the results using the log-rank test. The number of patients with a primary outcome is what was reported in the NEJM paper. Below is the unpublished cumulative incidence information.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time in Therapeutic Range Over Full Length of Follow-up (0 to 100 Percent)

    Time frame: Full length of follow-up; average of 3 years

    Time in target range (TTR) based on Prothrombin Time standardized to the International Normalized Ratio

  2. DASS at 2 Years of Follow-up

    Time frame: At two years of follow-up

    Satisfaction with care was quantified using the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS). Scores range from 25 to 225, with lower scores indicating higher satisfaction.

  3. Cumulative Gain in Health Utilities at 2 Year

    Time frame: After 2 years of follow-up for each subject

    Scores range from -0.36 to 1.00 per year, with a negative score indicating a state worse than being dead and a score of 1.00 indicating perfect health. Since the time frame is 2 years, the range is -0.72 to 2.00.

  4. Health Care Costs at 2 Year

    Time frame: After 2 years of follow-up for each subject

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs

Fed

Registry information

Official study title

CSP #481 - The Home INR Study (THINRS)

Acronym: THINRS

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Mar 28, 2002
Registry last updated
Apr 15, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.