Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02771353

The HeartSpare Plus 1B Trial

This study aims to compare the resource impact, acute toxicity and feasibility of different pan-lymph node radiotherapy techniques. Radiotherapy using wide tangents with the patient in breath hold will be compared against volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in free breathing in the main trial. A parallel study will asses the accuracy of VMAT treatments using voluntary deep inspiratory breath hold compared to an active breathing controlled breath hold device.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

About this study

Following publication of results of two large randomised clinical trials, pan-lymph node radiotherapy (pan-LN RT) (including treatment of the internal mammary chain) is set to become standard treatment in patients with lymph-node positive breast cancer. Traditional pan-LN RT techniques deliver high radiation doses to the heart and lungs which can cause long-term side-effects in women many years after their treatment. Modern techniques including breath-holding and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can reduce doses to heart and lungs but the investigators do not yet know which technique(s) are best in terms of resource costs, short to medium-term side-effects, and day to day accuracy. This study will compare the time taken to deliver pan-LN RT using breath-holding versus VMAT and will collect side-effect data up to one year following treatment as well as modelling long-term cardiac risks based on heart doses delivered. The results of the main study will help guide clinicians and departments in selecting the best pan-LN RT techniques for their patients. A parallel study will evaluate the combination of breath-hold and VMAT using a machine-based technique called the active-breathing controlled (ABC) device against a more simple voluntary breath-hold technique were patients simply take a breath in and hold it for up to 20 seconds at a time. These techniques will be compared in terms of their day-to-day accuracy. If the simpler technique proves as accurate as the ABC-technique, this will establish the simpler technique as a less resource-intensive standard of care adoptable by other radiotherapy departments.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Female or male
  • Invasive carcinoma of the breast (left or right-sided)
  • Breast conservation surgery or mastectomy
  • Axillary staging and/or dissection
  • pT1-T4,N1-2,M0 disease
  • Histological involvement of axillary lymph nodes
  • Indication for radiotherapy to the IMC, axillary levels I-III and/or level IV
  • Patient able to tolerate breath hold
  • Performance status 0-1

Exclusion criteria

  • Contralateral and/or previous ipsilateral breast cancer, irrespective of date of diagnosis
  • Past medical history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin carcinoma, (ii) CIN cervix uteri, (iii) non-breast malignancy allowed if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease free
  • Previous radiotherapy to any region above the diaphragm

Treatment and study plan

WT_vDIBH

Radiation

VMAT_FB

Radiation

Primary outcomes

  1. Linear Accelerator time

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    Patient mounting couch to linear accelerator being turned off

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute toxicity - Skin

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    CTCAE grading

  2. Acute toxicity - lung (pneumonitis)

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    CTCAE grading

  3. Acute toxicity - oesophagitis

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    CTCAE grading

  4. Acute toxicity - fatigue

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    EORTC QLQ-C30 + FA13

  5. Acute toxicity - quality of life

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    EORTC QLQ-C30 + BR23

  6. Intermediate toxicity - lung (pneumonitis)

    Time frame: up to 1 year

    CTCAE pneumonitis assesment

  7. Intermediate toxicity - fatigue

    Time frame: up to 1 year

    EORTC QLQ-C30 + FA13

  8. Intermediate toxicity - quality of life

    Time frame: up to 1 year

    EORTC QLQ-C30

  9. Intermediate toxicity - lymphoedema/ shoulder dysfunction

    Time frame: up to 1 year

    EORTC BR23

  10. Organ at risk dose - ipsilateral lung

    Time frame: Immediate

    mean dose to the ipsilateral lung (Gy) measured using DVH

  11. Organ at risk dose - contralateral lung

    Time frame: Immediate

    mean dose to the contralateral lung (Gy) measured using DVH

  12. Organ at risk dose - heart

    Time frame: Immediate

    mean dose to the heart (Gy) measured using DVH

  13. Organ at risk dose - contralateral breast

    Time frame: Immediate

    mean dose to the contralateral breast (Gy) measured using DVH

  14. Organ at risk dose - thyroid

    Time frame: Immediate

    mean dose to the thyroid (Gy) measured using DVH

  15. Organ at risk dose - humeral head

    Time frame: Immediate

    mean dose to the humeral head (Gy) measured using DVH

  16. Organ at risk dose - brachial plexus

    Time frame: Immediate

    maximum dose to the brachial plexus (Gy) measured using DVH

  17. Organ at risk dose - Left anterior descending coronary artery

    Time frame: Immediate

    maximum dose to the Left anterior descending coronary artery (Gy) measured using DVH

  18. Organ at risk dose - oesophagus

    Time frame: Immediate

    maximum dose to the oesophagus (Gy) measured using DVH

  19. Time taken to plan and check radiotherapy

    Time frame: Immediate

  20. Inter-fraction reproducibility

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    Distance - shift from planning CT on CBCT (mm)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The HeartSpare Plus 1B Trial: A Randomised Phase II Trial Comparing the Resource Impact, Acute Toxicity and Feasibility of Different Pan-lymph Node Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer Patients

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
May 13, 2016
Registry last updated
Apr 19, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.