NCT Number: NCT02771353
The HeartSpare Plus 1B Trial
This study aims to compare the resource impact, acute toxicity and feasibility of different pan-lymph node radiotherapy techniques. Radiotherapy using wide tangents with the patient in breath hold will be compared against volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in free breathing in the main trial. A parallel study will asses the accuracy of VMAT treatments using voluntary deep inspiratory breath hold compared to an active breathing controlled breath hold device.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
Female
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
About this study
Following publication of results of two large randomised clinical trials, pan-lymph node radiotherapy (pan-LN RT) (including treatment of the internal mammary chain) is set to become standard treatment in patients with lymph-node positive breast cancer. Traditional pan-LN RT techniques deliver high radiation doses to the heart and lungs which can cause long-term side-effects in women many years after their treatment. Modern techniques including breath-holding and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can reduce doses to heart and lungs but the investigators do not yet know which technique(s) are best in terms of resource costs, short to medium-term side-effects, and day to day accuracy. This study will compare the time taken to deliver pan-LN RT using breath-holding versus VMAT and will collect side-effect data up to one year following treatment as well as modelling long-term cardiac risks based on heart doses delivered. The results of the main study will help guide clinicians and departments in selecting the best pan-LN RT techniques for their patients. A parallel study will evaluate the combination of breath-hold and VMAT using a machine-based technique called the active-breathing controlled (ABC) device against a more simple voluntary breath-hold technique were patients simply take a breath in and hold it for up to 20 seconds at a time. These techniques will be compared in terms of their day-to-day accuracy. If the simpler technique proves as accurate as the ABC-technique, this will establish the simpler technique as a less resource-intensive standard of care adoptable by other radiotherapy departments.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Age ≥18 years
- Female or male
- Invasive carcinoma of the breast (left or right-sided)
- Breast conservation surgery or mastectomy
- Axillary staging and/or dissection
- pT1-T4,N1-2,M0 disease
- Histological involvement of axillary lymph nodes
- Indication for radiotherapy to the IMC, axillary levels I-III and/or level IV
- Patient able to tolerate breath hold
- Performance status 0-1
Exclusion criteria
- Contralateral and/or previous ipsilateral breast cancer, irrespective of date of diagnosis
- Past medical history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin carcinoma, (ii) CIN cervix uteri, (iii) non-breast malignancy allowed if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease free
- Previous radiotherapy to any region above the diaphragm
Treatment and study plan
VMAT_FB
RadiationPrimary outcomes
-
Linear Accelerator time
Time frame: 3 weeks
Patient mounting couch to linear accelerator being turned off
Secondary outcomes
-
Acute toxicity - Skin
Time frame: 5 weeks
CTCAE grading
-
Acute toxicity - lung (pneumonitis)
Time frame: 5 weeks
CTCAE grading
-
Acute toxicity - oesophagitis
Time frame: 5 weeks
CTCAE grading
-
Acute toxicity - fatigue
Time frame: 5 weeks
EORTC QLQ-C30 + FA13
-
Acute toxicity - quality of life
Time frame: 5 weeks
EORTC QLQ-C30 + BR23
-
Intermediate toxicity - lung (pneumonitis)
Time frame: up to 1 year
CTCAE pneumonitis assesment
-
Intermediate toxicity - fatigue
Time frame: up to 1 year
EORTC QLQ-C30 + FA13
-
Intermediate toxicity - quality of life
Time frame: up to 1 year
EORTC QLQ-C30
-
Intermediate toxicity - lymphoedema/ shoulder dysfunction
Time frame: up to 1 year
EORTC BR23
-
Organ at risk dose - ipsilateral lung
Time frame: Immediate
mean dose to the ipsilateral lung (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Organ at risk dose - contralateral lung
Time frame: Immediate
mean dose to the contralateral lung (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Organ at risk dose - heart
Time frame: Immediate
mean dose to the heart (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Organ at risk dose - contralateral breast
Time frame: Immediate
mean dose to the contralateral breast (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Organ at risk dose - thyroid
Time frame: Immediate
mean dose to the thyroid (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Organ at risk dose - humeral head
Time frame: Immediate
mean dose to the humeral head (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Organ at risk dose - brachial plexus
Time frame: Immediate
maximum dose to the brachial plexus (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Organ at risk dose - Left anterior descending coronary artery
Time frame: Immediate
maximum dose to the Left anterior descending coronary artery (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Organ at risk dose - oesophagus
Time frame: Immediate
maximum dose to the oesophagus (Gy) measured using DVH
-
Time taken to plan and check radiotherapy
Time frame: Immediate
-
Inter-fraction reproducibility
Time frame: 3 weeks
Distance - shift from planning CT on CBCT (mm)
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Other
Registry information
Official study title
The HeartSpare Plus 1B Trial: A Randomised Phase II Trial Comparing the Resource Impact, Acute Toxicity and Feasibility of Different Pan-lymph Node Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer Patients
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2019
- Study completion
- 2019
- First posted
- May 13, 2016
- Registry last updated
- Apr 19, 2022
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Tumor-Derived FGF19
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsAfrican Cancer Genome: GMD
NCT05754658
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details24GUT540 : Meeting of Breast Cancer Patients and Pathologists
NCT07040514
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial DetailsNeoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel for Stage I Triple-negative Breast Cancer
NCT06604858
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
A Coruña, Spain
View Trial Details