Heartfelt Device installed
DeviceDevice installed in the patient's home and capturing foot volume data which are processed in the cloud.
Other names: Remote patient monitoring device
NCT Number: NCT06222099
This pragmatic randomized crossover trial looks at the effect(s) of using a remote patient monitoring device (Heartfelt device) with health alerts to monitor the development of peripheral edema in patients with heart failure (HF). The hypothesis is that this passive measurement method will lead to better data availability, which in turn will improve patient care and reduce hospitalizations for the management of worsening HF (HF hospitalizations, HFHs) in nonadherent participants with chronic HF. The study objectives are:
* Primary objective: Establish if the Heartfelt device is safe to use and effective at reducing HFHs. * Secondary objectives:
1. Establish the effect of the Heartfelt device on data availability compared to existing remote monitoring devices. 2. Establish the effect of the Heartfelt device on HF clinical outcomes.
Participants will need to:
* Install the device in their home for at least a year and up to 4 additional years after. * Reply to remote patient monitoring phone calls to follow the care plans.
Interested in participating?
Request Info22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Baptist Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Participants will be recruited through Remote Patient Monitoring Providers (RPMPs) based in the US, using crossover randomization between standard care and Heartfelt device usage with health alerts sent to RPMPs. The RPMPs will follow a protocolized intervention when responding to raised alerts.
The study design is a crossover randomization between:
At consent, patients get randomized to an install date over a period from 21 to 60 days following consent, subject to scheduling this at least 14 days after the most recent recorded hospital discharge at the time of consent, or the discharge from their current hospitalization if hospitalized at the time of consent.
Total study length is 366 days (days 0 to 365). There are two 21-day "washout" periods to prevent carryover between study arms. The first washout period extends from day 0-20 inclusive, and the second from day 183-203 inclusive
At the completion of both crossover arms, patients will be offered the opportunity to keep the device for as long as the study remains active (potentially up to an additional 4 years, for those patients recruited early in the study). During this long-term follow-up, the device will be placed in "Intervention" mode, with randomized 100-day periods where the device is switched into "Standard care" mode (control).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a.Hospitalization for heart failure occurring at least once in the past 6 months or at least twice in the past 12 months; OR b.Receipt of intravenous/subcutaneous diuretic therapy for heart failure (inpatient or outpatient setting) occurring at least once in the past 6 months or at least twice in the past 12 months; OR c.Emergency department or urgent care visit for heart failure decompensation, occurring at least once in the past 6 months or at least twice in the past 12 months; OR d.Clinician assessment that the participant is at high risk of heart failure hospitalization within the next 6-12 months, based on documented recent clinical course (e.g. worsening congestion, escalating diuretic requirements, recurrent decompensation, and/or comorbidity burden).
● Failure to collect ≥50% of expected days of prescribed home physiological monitoring data (e.g. weight, blood pressure, or other clinician-recommended measurements), assessed over a continuous 180-day period; OR
● Discontinuation from a remote patient monitoring/home monitoring program due to non-adherence; OR
● Failure to adhere to a prescribed home-based therapy/monitoring intervention, supported by device usage data showing <50% of expected days of use over a continuous 180-day period.
● ≤2 days of monitoring data recorded for each of the most recent 4 consecutive weeks during which any remote monitoring device was continuously available in the patient's home; OR
● ≤3 days of monitoring data recorded in any consecutive 8 week period period during which any remote monitoring device was continuously available in the patient home; AND/OR
Device installed in the patient's home and capturing foot volume data which are processed in the cloud.
Other names: Remote patient monitoring device
RPMPs in regular contact with patients and collecting health monitoring data as per their standard operating procedures.
Other names: Daily weighing, Breathlessness, Dizziness, Tiredness
Volume measurements and health alerts transmitted to the RPMP for review. RPMPs follow a pre-specified alert protocol, potentially following up with the patient.
Other names: Daily weighing, Remote patient monitoring
Patients were presented with one or more optional questionnaires (some validated, some bespoke)
Other names: KCCQ, 5Q-5D, PAM Questionnaire, Bespoke Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to demonstrate whether the device effectively reduces HFHs and urgent HF visits.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to ensure that increased diuretic treatment following alerts from the device does not lead to significant increase in AKI
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to measure the data availability from the Heartfelt device. One of the key findings from feasibility trials and pilot studies in the UK have demonstrated an increased data availability. Does this study in the US confirm the previous finding?
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to review the lead time of health alerts, or the lack of health alerts generated prior to hospital admissions.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to review the lead time of health alerts, or the lack of health alerts generated prior to hospital admissions.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
This may include oral diuretic, IV diuretics and subcutaneous furosemide injections. Used to allow the determination if an outpatient appointment is HF related or not.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish if using the device changes HF- or non-HF mortality.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish if there has been an effect on the ability of the patient to live independently in their home.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish if using the device changes the scheduling and/or setting of care and/or route of admission.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish if using the device changes the scheduling and/or setting of care and/or route of admission.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish if using the device changes the scheduling and/or setting of care and/or route of admission.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish the response time to health alerts.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish the response time to health alerts.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used alongside the analysis of other right-censoring endpoints.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to correlate NT Pro-BNP health alert status.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to correlate health alerts from other medical devices and the Heartfelt device.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish patient usage of symptom diaries.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to establish patient acceptability of the device.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Recorded in hours if <48h and in days if >48h. Proxy used to identify trends in worsening of patient's health/independence/quality of life following participation in various arms of the study.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Proxy used to identify trends in worsening of patient's health/independence/quality of life following participation in various arms of the study.
Time frame: Retrospectively, over the 12 months prior to device installation
Used to compare HF Hospitalization date before the study as a baseline period and during the study.
Time frame: Retrospectively, over the 12 months prior to device installation
Used to compare Heart Failure Visit numbers before the study as a baseline period and during the study.
Time frame: 12 months
Used to supplement data on HF-related death that is collected as a primary endpoint from clinical records of participants, as well as allowing the comparison to non-participants.
Time frame: At enrollment
Used to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: At enrollment
Used to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: At enrollment
Used to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: At enrollment
Used to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to get an indication of medication adherence.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to get an indication of medication adherence.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to validate the device's determination of edema status.
Time frame: Retrospectively, over the 6 months prior to screening
Used to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to ensure that any device-related complications that occur after the main 12 months of the study are captured.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to determine if any significant changes in outcomes might be due to increases in patient contacts overall.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to determine if any significant changes in outcomes might be due to lifestyle choices and to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to determine if any significant changes in outcomes might be due to lifestyle choices and to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to determine if any significant changes in outcomes might be due to lifestyle choices and to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to determine if any significant changes in outcomes might be due to lifestyle choices and to analyze the other endpoints based on this subgroup.
Time frame: 12 months, plus up to 48 months long term follow-up
Used to determine if a correlation could be identified between treatment effect and type of hospital stays; as well as sensitivity and specificity of the alert analysis.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Amparito Cunningham, MD. MPH.
CONTACT
WH Wilson Tang, MD
CONTACT
Heartfelt Technologies
Industry
A Pragmatic, Single-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial Testing the Effectiveness of Autonomous Remote Patient Peripheral Edema Monitoring and Reporting in HEART FailurE Compared to conventionaL remoTe Patient Monitoring.
Acronym: HEARTFELT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07443969
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Heart Disease
Heerlen, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT03892148
Acute Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Diseases
Annecy, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05295641
Acute Heart Failure (AHF), Cardiovascular Diseases
Manhasset, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05377190
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Heart Failure
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details